detector-scope-peer-review-gpt4o

Detects GPT-4o-written reviews of machine-learning papers (trained on the AI Peer Review Detection Benchmark, human reviews vs. GPT-4o reviews). Gemma-2-2b fine-tuned as a review classifier, sparse autoencoders fine-tuned on it, and a sparse logistic-regression head over their features. Every prediction is a sum of contributions from sparse-autoencoder features, each with a validated natural-language description, so the detector can say which properties of the text drove its decision and where they occur. Paper: Building Auditable AI Text Detectors with Sparse Autoencoders; code: google-deepmind/detectorscope.

Use

pip install detectorscope
from detectorscope import AuditableDetector

det = AuditableDetector.from_pretrained("liamdugan/detector-scope-peer-review-gpt4o")
out = det("The authors propose a novel framework for ...")

out.p_ai       # probability that the text is AI-written
out.label      # "ai" or "human" (logit threshold +0.29)
out.features   # [Feature(id, importance, description, highlights), ...]

out.features lists every feature active in the text with a non-zero effect, largest effect first. importance is how much the logit falls if that feature is silenced: positive pushes toward AI, negative toward human, and out.logit == out.bias + sum(f.importance for f in out.features). A list of texts returns a list of detections.

To see where a feature fires:

out = det(text, return_highlights=True)
out.tokens                  # the text as a list of tokens
out.features[0].highlights  # [(token index, activation), ...] of the top feature

The default head is logistic regression over the features whose auto-interpretation score is at least 0.85. head="xgboost" or another tau (0.00 to 0.95 in steps of 0.05), on from_pretrained or on the call, selects one of the other 39 heads.

Performance

Default head; the decision threshold is fixed on the development data.

split AUROC F1 accuracy documents
PRDB test, GPT-4o reviews 1.000 0.998 0.998 57,368

What it looks at

The features with the largest average contribution on the training data (weight Γ— mean activation when active; density = share of the documents of each class in which the feature fires).

Toward AI

feature description mean contribution AI density human density
13_15950 academic paper review questions asking for more information details or clarification +1.002 75% 1%
17_8459 academic review feedback or peer review decisions +0.814 91% 0%
22_4800 double colons following bolded markdown section headers +0.672 51% 0%
17_12216 activates on the word potential +0.515 87% 14%
7_10900 the word particularly when used as an adverb to specify or emphasize a context +0.438 73% 8%
17_11188 academic research terminology related to study design and methods +0.388 62% 7%
7_4872 activates on the word potentially often used to hedge academic critique or discuss future implications +0.363 41% 1%
13_15079 societal impact in research paper sections +0.357 77% 0%
22_16295 the word beyond in academic or technical contexts +0.320 47% 7%
7_5712 forms of the word enhance such as enhances enhancing and enhancements +0.307 70% 9%

Toward human

feature description mean contribution AI density human density
13_5785 first person singular pronoun i at start of sentences or after punctuation -0.919 10% 73%
17_13291 forms of the verb seem -0.639 9% 49%
22_8699 academic review section headers like clarity and clarify -0.574 1% 35%
7_6962 word for at the start of a sentence -0.427 6% 35%
7_13654 math and variable notation indices and subscripts -0.392 2% 38%
7_7454 the adverb very in various forms and cases -0.341 11% 45%
13_5925 modal verb might -0.334 4% 20%
7_23 academic document figure or fig references -0.306 9% 32%
22_13623 polite imperative requests used in academic review feedback -0.297 0% 20%
13_12569 words related to academic paper authors and roles like writer author or auth -0.294 1% 12%

Variants

Branches of this repo hold the paper's other two settings on the same data: ft-sae (the unmodified Gemma-2-2b with the fine-tuned SAEs) and base-sae (the unmodified Gemma-2-2b with the Gemma Scope SAEs). Load one with revision="ft-sae" or revision="base-sae". The general-domain detector is detector-scope.

Licence

The language model under extractor/ is Gemma-2-2b fine-tuned on these reviews, provided under and subject to the Gemma Terms of Use (see NOTICE). The sparse autoencoders derive from Gemma Scope (CC-BY-4.0); the heads and feature descriptions are CC-BY-4.0.

Citation

@misc{dugan2026detectorscope,
  title={Building Auditable AI Text Detectors with Sparse Autoencoders},
  author={Liam Dugan and Callum McDougall and Matthew Denton and Phillip Pham and Christine Kaeser-Chen and Chris Callison-Burch},
  year={2026},
  eprint={2610.30006},
  archivePrefix={arXiv},
  url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.30006},
}
Downloads last month
202
Safetensors
Model size
0.3B params
Tensor type
F32
Β·
Inference Providers NEW
This model isn't deployed by any Inference Provider. πŸ™‹ Ask for provider support

Model tree for liamdugan/detector-scope-peer-review-gpt4o

Finetuned
(608)
this model

Spaces using liamdugan/detector-scope-peer-review-gpt4o 4

Collection including liamdugan/detector-scope-peer-review-gpt4o

Paper for liamdugan/detector-scope-peer-review-gpt4o