benchmark data for Kimi-K3-Cubic-2.5Bit

#2
by bencswong2 - opened

Dataset: GPQA Diamond (198 questions)
Config: temperature 1.0, top_p 0.95, reasoning_effort max
Result: 178/198 = 89.9%

On the deepswe test set, when running with FP8_Q16, only 2 out of the first 11 questions were answered correctly. With BF16, this improved to 6 questions. I also found that running the model for an extended period (running deepswe) causes the model to malfunction — it keeps outputting '@@@' continuously, and GPU 0 draws around 400W while the other GPUs are at roughly 200-something W. In the end, using BF16, it ran through over 90 questions with an accuracy of about 51%. Based on extrapolation, the final score should land around 52–57%, which is far too far from the score of the full-version Kimi K3 model. I hope your next quantized model will come with better tuning.

QuantTrio org

Thanks for testing! I’ve found quite a few floating-point bugs in vLLM that hurt model quality. Without careful fixes, even the BF16 model performs worse than llama.cpp, which avoids distributed inference and all-reduce.

Fixing this comes first, so quantization is a lower priority for now. Cubic quant has also been further optimized, and more BPW-efficient versions are coming. Stay tuned!

bencswong2 changed discussion status to closed
bencswong2 changed discussion status to open

Thanks for testing! I’ve found quite a few floating-point bugs in vLLM that hurt model quality. Without careful fixes, even the BF16 model performs worse than llama.cpp, which avoids distributed inference and all-reduce.

Fixing this comes first, so quantization is a lower priority for now. Cubic quant has also been further optimized, and more BPW-efficient versions are coming. Stay tuned!

Hi tclf90, thanks for the update and for prioritizing those floating-point bug fixes — that definitely makes sense as a first step.

In the meantime, I'd suggest using DeepSwe for testing, as it provides a more standardized and reproducible evaluation pipeline. I actually have a complete test script ready to go for this. If you're interested, just let me know and I can share it with you. It might help streamline the validation process once the BF16 fixes are in place, and could also be useful for benchmarking the upcoming Cubic quant versions.

Looking forward to the improvements — keep up the great work!

Sign up or log in to comment