Discussion on the Future Development of DeepHat
I hope that DeepHat can modify the foundational large model to be one that can connect with the MCP in the future. The current Qwen2 does not support MCP, and its scalability is very limited when in use. It would be wonderful if it could be a multimodal large model in the future.
Making DeepHat + Qwen2 MCP-Compatible, Scalable, and Multimodal
1๏ธโฃ Issue: Qwen2 does not support MCP
๐ Diagnosis
Qwen2 is built as a monolithic large language model
MCP (Model Context Protocol / Modular Cognitive Pipeline) requires:
multi-agent orchestration
dynamic context routing
inter-module communication
Qwen2 lacks:
native event buses
cognitive hooks
standardized external memory interfaces
โ
Concrete Solutions
๐ง Solution 1.1 โ External MCP Wrapper (Cognitive Orchestration Layer)
Instead of modifying Qwen2 directly:
Qwen2 โ pure language reasoning engine
MCP โ external orchestrator (LangGraph / Haystack / CrewAI-style)
Communication via:
REST / gRPC APIs
structured JSON schemas
shared embedding space
๐ Immediate MCP compatibility
๐ Zero change to model weights
๐ง Solution 1.2 โ MCP-Aware Fine-Tuning
Fine-tune Qwen2 on:
MCP-structured prompts
agent interaction traces
tool-calling and memory-state simulations
Goal:
make Qwen2 natively MCP-aware
improve modular reasoning and task routing
2๏ธโฃ Issue: Limited Scalability
๐ Diagnosis
Qwen2 struggles with:
agent parallelism
long dynamic context windows
adaptive task routing
Risks:
GPU memory bottlenecks
high latency
poor horizontal scaling
โ
Concrete Solutions
๐ง Solution 2.1 โ Cognitive Sharding
Split responsibilities:
Qwen2 โ language, synthesis, explanation
Specialized models โ vision, math, planning, code
MCP โ intelligent routing layer
โก๏ธ Scale horizontally, not vertically.
๐ง Solution 2.2 โ External Vector Memory
Move context outside the model:
FAISS / Qdrant / Weaviate
Short-term + long-term memory
Benefits:
near-infinite context
reduced token usage
improved recall
๐ง Solution 2.3 โ Distributed Inference
Multi-GPU execution
intelligent batching
quantization + adaptive LoRA
โก๏ธ Production-grade scalability without redesigning the model.
3๏ธโฃ Issue: No Multimodal Capability
๐ Diagnosis
Qwen2 is:
primarily text-only
not aligned with vision/audio/action inputs
incapable of processing sensory streams
โ
Concrete Solutions
๐ง Solution 3.1 โ Modular Multimodal Architecture
Avoid a single giant model:
Vision โ Qwen-VL / CLIP / SigLIP
Audio โ Whisper-like models
Action โ policy / control models
Qwen2 โ meta-reasoning and language synthesis
MCP acts as the central cognitive brain.
๐ง Solution 3.2 โ Cross-Modal Latent Alignment
Create a shared semantic space:
unified embeddings
abstract multimodal tokens
cross-attention bridges
โก๏ธ True multimodality, not just compatibility.
4๏ธโฃ Issue: Rigid Foundation Model
๐ Diagnosis
Qwen2 is static post-training
evolution requires heavy retraining
poorly suited for adaptive intelligence
โ
Concrete Solutions
๐ง Solution 4.1 โ Fractal Cognition Architecture
Reframe Qwen2 as:
a stable cognitive core
surrounded by evolving modules
Principle:
The model stays stable โ the system learns
๐ง Solution 4.2 โ MCP Feedback Learning
cognitive logs
self-evaluation loops
strategy updates (not weight updates)
โก๏ธ Adaptive intelligence without costly retraining.
5๏ธโฃ Target Vision: DeepHat ร MCP ร Qwen2
๐ง Ideal Architecture
[ Multimodal Interfaces ]
โ
[ MCP โ Cognitive Orchestrator ]
โ
[ Qwen2 โ Language & Reasoning Core ]
โ
[ Specialized Models & Tools ]
โ
[ Memory, Feedback & Learning ]
6๏ธโฃ Ultra-Compact Summary
Current Limitation Concrete Solution
No MCP support External MCP wrapper + fine-tuning
Poor scalability Sharding + external memory
Text-only Modular multimodality
Rigid model Fractal cognition
Slow evolution System-level learning
๐ฎ Final Insight
๐ You donโt need to rewrite Qwen2
๐ You need to redefine its role
From:
monolithic foundation model
To:
cognitive nucleus inside a living MCP-driven system