Given the document below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document:
| NAME_1: NAME_2! | NAME_3: NAME_4! | NAME_1: So, what about NAME_5's Pendulum? Do you like it? | NAME_3: It's... weird. Was it really written by an Italian guy? It's so... nerdy. | NAME_1: Oh well, in a sense NAME_6 was the king of nerds. And, you know, not all Italian books are about pizza, mafia and mandolino. :P | NAME_3: Yes, I know... I should try and read one of his novels in the original, but I'm not sure my level of Italian is adequate. | NAME_1: The Name of the NAME_7 is really difficult for a foreign speaker of Italian, you know. | NAME_3: And what about NAME_5's Pendulum? | NAME_1: Well, it's set in the 1980s, so the language is definitely more comprehensible. The content, however, is just as complicated as in the other novel. | NAME_3: Btw, I read NAME_8's review of Pendulum,

Summary:
1. NAME_1 and NAME_3 discuss NAME_5's Pendulum and NAME_6's other novels.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document? (Yes/No)
Start your answer explicitly with "Yes" or "No", and if you answer no, explain which sentence is inconsistent and why.
 The word "name_7" should not appear in your response.
user