Given the document below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document:
| NAME_1: <file_photo> | NAME_1: look what I just found :) | NAME_2: NAME_3, that's just nasty and you know it :) | NAME_2: it has no sugar, no taste, and additional cinnamon flavoring | NAME_1: yeah, I know - that's awesome :) | NAME_2: you sir have a very strange tastes :P | NAME_1: well, and I found a perfect company for it <file_photo> | NAME_2: oh, that's more like it! | NAME_2: but does the whiskey go well with the cinnamon? flavored whiskey is the worst... | NAME_1: Actually it does taste surprisingly well. The cinnamon is not overpowering. If you put enough whiskey that is :) | NAME_4: Lol, thought so :) | NAME_4: I just wish the brought the old cherry flavor back... | NAME_4: not the useless no-sugar stuff | NAME_1: Ah, that is true :)

Summary:
1. NAME_1 has found a perfect company for it .
2. NAME_2 has a company for the cinnamon whiskey is the worst .

Is the summary factually consistent with the document? (Yes/No)
Start your answer explicitly with "Yes" or "No", and if you answer no, explain which sentence is inconsistent and why.
 Make sure to only use capital letters in your entire response.
user