Context: When were concerns raised with NAME_1?
With all due respect, I don't think things have ever been like this at NAME_1.
(NAME_1 officials did not return calls for comment.)
Also, please let me know if there are others at NAME_1 I should include in this discussion.
What's surprising is that in the United States, accountants and rating agencies managed to maintain silence, or ignorance, about NAME_1's practices for so long.
NAME_1 officials did not return repeated calls for comment.
Were those of them with heavy investments in NAME_1 unconcerned about the conduct of the company?
The accounting profession had a credibility problem before NAME_1.
Was NAME_1 right in thinking its friends in government would not be in a hurry to investigate or to reprimand?
An official with NAME_1 couldn't immediately be reached for comment.
Comments from NAME_1 in-house counsel.
Are the financial difficulties at NAME_1 effecting you much?
Do you have any news regarding NAME_1 on this point?
I have worked with NAME_1 for over 7 years and I am shocked at this.
Have you received notice of any objections to NAME_1's claims??
When questioned, NAME_1 declined to comment.
It's strange that NAME_1 would profess this attitude.
NAME_1 officials couldn't be reached for comment.
However, all behavior with respect to your concerns must be practical in light of NAME_1's cash management systems.
What is the view of NAME_1 here?
The SEC filing raises further questions about NAME_1's accounting procedures and disclosure policies.
Do you have any news regarding EN In your response, include at most 18 words that are fully capitalized to emphasize key points.
user