Given the document below, determine if the summary is factually consistent with the document. A summary is factually consistent if all entity names in the summary are presented the same way as in the document.

Document: The Russian, who started the day six shots off the lead, found the water six times on the par-five first hole at the Diamond Country Club in Atzenbrugg. Englishman NAME_1 also managed 17 on one hole at Gleneagles in 2003. NAME_2 heads the European list with 20 at the 1978 French Open. However, the Frenchman will have to doff his hat in the direction of American NAME_3 and the "Silver Scot" NAME_4, who both took 23 shots on a single hole on the American tour circuit. NAME_5, who won three majors, managed the unwanted feat at the 1927 Shawnee Open, while NAME_6 suffered his nightmare at the 1938 US Open. NAME_7 completed the front nine in 53, 17-over, after adding three bogeys and a double bogey to his card. Two birdies helped restrict the damage on the back nine to 37 and an eventual completed round

Summary: 1. However, the French will not have to take off hats in the direction of the American NAME_3 and the "Silver Scot NAME_8 , both of whom are on the US Tour.
2. 23 shots in a hole.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document with respect to entity names?
Options: "Yes" or "No"

Answer:


 In your response, include at most 5 words that are fully capitalized to emphasize key points.
user