I will now describe the logic for determining wildfire smoke and provide a text，you need to use the logic to make logical corrections for the provided text and output your thought process and the logically corrected text.
The logic for determining wildfire smoke is as follows:
1. If flames or smoke caused by a fire are visible in the image, the conclusion is "Yes"
2. If there is no smoke caused by a fire visible in the image, such as smoke emanating from a chimney, the conclusion is "No"
3. If it is uncertain whether the image depicts flames and smoke, the conclusion is "Not Sure". Uncertainty may arise in the following situations:
a. Overexposed yellow or white patches in a dark environment where it is difficult to determine if they represent actual flames based on surrounding environmental information.
b. No flames appeared in the image, only white smoke, and it was not possible to determine whether the smoke was caused by a fire by using information about the surrounding environment.
It should be noted that if the color of the smoke is a color other than white, and the smoke is not discharged from the chimney, the conclusion should be "Yes".
Here is the text:
{Conclusion: Not Sure}{Description: There is no flame, there is smoke. Smoke appears in the image. The smoke is white. The smoke was emitted by the factory chimneys. There is a transmission line in the diagram. At the top left of the image, there are two transmission towers connected to overhead lines. The overhead lines are transversally connected. There is a certain distance between the smoke and the camera, and there is a distance between the smoke and the transmission tower and the overhead line.}{Impact: No impact. There is a certain distance between the smoke and the camera, the transmission tower and the overhead line, so there is no impact on the transmission line.} In your response, capitalize a few words to stress main points. Please limit the number of words with all capital letters to less than 14.
user