Given the document below, determine if the summary is factually consistent with the document. A summary is factually consistent if all the numbers in the summary are presented the same way as in the document.

Document: NAME_1 said the government will not accept mandatory quotas. The European Commission is expected to announce details of its plan to deal with the migrants on Wednesday. Reports suggest it will call for a quota system for member states to relocate some 40,000 asylum seekers. The UK has an opt-out which it has previously said it would use. Many of the migrants arrived in southern Europe by boat in recent months. The plan to use quotas to resettle those who have made it to Europe has caused controversy among several EU countries, including France and Spain. Ms NAME_2 told the BBC: "We don't accept having mandatory quotas or mandatory resettlement programmes. "Our concern is that approach simply ends up acting as a pull for more migrants to make, what for many of them is a life and death decision to get on a boat that may not be sea

Summary: 1. The European Commission is expected to announce details of plan to with the migrants on Wednesday.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document with respect to numbers?
Options: "Yes" or "No"

Answer:


 I want the entire output in JSON format.
user