Given the document below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document:
Messenger: Spies of the Volsces Held me in chase, that I was forced to wheel Three or four miles about, else had I, sir, Half an hour since brought my report. COMINIUS: Who's yonder, That does appear as he were flay'd? O gods He has the stamp of NAME_1; and I have Before-time seen him thus. NAME_1: COMINIUS: The shepherd knows not thunder from a tabour More than I know the sound of NAME_1' tongue From every meaner man. NAME_1: Come I too late? COMINIUS: Ay, if you come not in the blood of others, But mantled in your own. NAME_1: O, let me clip ye In arms as sound as when I woo'd, in heart As NAME_2 as when our nuptial day was done, And tapers burn'd to bedward! COMINIUS: Flower of warriors, How is it with NAME_3 NAME_4? NAME_1: As with a man busied about decrees: Condemning some to death, and some to exile; Ransoming him, or pitying, threatening the other; Holding Corioli in the name of Rome, Even like a fawning greyhound in the leash, To let

Summary:
1. This excerpt from a play features NAME_1 discussing battles, strategies, and fighting alone.
2. NAME_1 pleads for the chance to face his sworn enemy, Aufidius, in the past conflict, while Cominius and NAME_4 make plans for reversing their gains and losing their territory.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document? (Yes/No)
Start your answer explicitly with "Yes" or "No", and if you answer no, explain which sen Please use JSON format in your answer.
user