Given the document below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document:
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the ``Family Business Protection Act of 1995''. SEC. 2. FAMILY-OWNED BUSINESS EXCLUSION. (a) In General.--Part III of subchapter A of chapter 11 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to gross estate) is amended by inserting after section 2033 the following new section: ``SEC. 2033A. FAMILY-OWNED BUSINESS EXCLUSION. ``(a) In General.--In the case of an estate of a decedent to which this section applies, the value of the gross estate shall not include the lesser of-- ``(1) the adjusted value of the qualified family-owned business interests of the decedent otherwise includible in the estate, or ``(2) the sum of-- ``(A) $1,500,000, plus ``(B) 50 percent of the excess (if any) of the adjusted value of such interests over $1,500,000. ``(b) Estates to Which Section Applies.--This section shall apply to an estate if-- ``(1) the decedent was (at the date of the decedent's death) a citizen or resident of the United States, ``(2) the sum of-- ``(A) the adjusted value of the qualified family- owned business interests which-- ``(i) are

Summary:
1. Family Business Protection Act of 1995 - Alters the Internal Revenue Code to exclude from the gross estate, for estate tax purposes, specific portions of the adjusted value of the qualified family-owned business interests of the decedent.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document? The letter o should appear at least 18 times.
user