Given the document below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document:
MENENIUS: What is granted them? NAME_1: Five tribunes to defend their vulgar wisdoms, Of their own choice: one's NAME_2, Sicinius Velutus, and I know not--'Sdeath! The rabble should have first unroof'd the city, Ere so prevail'd with me: it will in time Win upon power and throw forth greater themes For insurrection's arguing. MENENIUS: This is strange. NAME_1: Go, get you home, you fragments! NAME_3: Where's NAME_4? NAME_1: Here: what's the matter? NAME_3: The news is, sir, the Volsces are in arms. NAME_1: I am glad on 't: then we shall ha' means to vent Our musty superfluity. See, our best elders. First Senator: NAME_1, 'tis true that you have lately told us; The Volsces are in arms. NAME_1: They have a leader, NAME_5, that will put you to 't. I sin in envying his nobility, And were I any thing but what I am, I would wish me only he. COMINIUS: You have fought together. NAME_1: Were half to half the world by the ears and he. Upon my party, I'ld revolt to make Only my

Summary:
1. The document revolves around the discussion of an impending war, with NAME_1 as a key figure, whose humility, cowardice, and lack of ambition intertwine with his relationship with Cominius and the senate.
2. As tensions rise among the characters, they prepare for conflict, with little effect on the intricacies of politics, honor, and alliances.

Is the summary factually The words with all capital letters should appear at least 19 times.
user