Given the document below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document:
A NAME_1 woman has become a TV sensation in the Philippines, earning a legion of adoring fans in southeast Asia and an award nomination for her role in the country's answer to US hit series Modern Family. After struggling to hit the big time in Australia, bubbly blonde NAME_2 followed her dreams and moved to the Philippines in 2012. She became fluent in the local language, Tagalog, in the hope of becoming a star. Scroll down for video NAME_2 (pictured) learned Filipino language Tagalog to score a role on sitcom Ismol Family The NAME_1 woman moved to the Philippines in 2012 after struggling to find work as an actress in Australia NAME_2 is also a model who has been featured on magazine cousins in the Philippines The risk paid off as the 23-year-old, who promotes herself as 'the NAME_3 from Down Under', landed a major role in

Summary:
1. NAME_2 learned filipino language tagalog to score a role on sitcom ismol family .
2. the NAME_1 woman moved to the philippines in 2012 after struggling to find work as an actress in australia .
3. the 23-year-old , who promotes herself as ` the NAME_3 from down under ' , landed a major role in 2014 playing a catty maid , also named NAME_4 , in the new sitcom ` ismol family '

Is the summary factually consistent with the document? (Yes/No)
Start your answer explicitly with "Yes" or "No", and if you answer no, explain which sentence is inconsistent and why.
 Your response should contain less than 350 words.
user