Given the document below, determine if the summary is factually consistent with the document.
A summary is factually consistent if all statements in the summary are entailed by the document.

Document: The Russian, who started the day six shots off the lead, found the water six times on the par-five first hole at the Diamond Country Club in Atzenbrugg. Englishman NAME_1 also managed 17 on one hole at Gleneagles in 2003. NAME_2 heads the European list with 20 at the 1978 French Open. However, the NAME_3 will have to doff his hat in the direction of NAME_4 and the "Silver Scot" NAME_5, who both took 23 shots on a single hole on the American tour circuit. NAME_6, who won three majors, managed the unwanted feat at the 1927 Shawnee Open, while NAME_7 suffered his nightmare at the 1938 US Open. NAME_8 completed the front nine in 53, 17-over, after adding three bogeys and a double bogey to his card. Two birdies helped restrict the damage on the back nine to 37 and an eventual completed round

Summary: 1. However, the French will not have to take off hats in the direction of the NAME_4 and the "Silver Scot NAME_9 , both of whom are on the US Tour.
2. 23 shots in a hole.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document?
Start your answer with "Yes" or "No".

Answer:


 Make sure to only use capital letters in your entire response.
user