Given the document below, determine if the summary is factually consistent with the document. A summary is factually consistent if all the dates and times in the summary are presented the same way as in the document.

Document: NAME_1, 49, and his entourage were reportedly only able to get into the bar with the help of diplomatic protection police officers. They are said to have told staff proof of ID in this case was not necessary. Queensland and other states in Australia have strict rules about entering premises which sell alcohol. In most cases, late-night drinkers in Queensland must have their passports or driving licences to prove their identities when entering establishments that stay open after midnight. The state government says the laws introduced in July are in place "to minimise the risk of alcohol-related harm". NAME_2 and his aides were in Brisbane for a yachting regatta, local media reported. They were only allowed into the bar after civil servants gave permission for the ID requirements to be waived. Bar co-owner NAME_3 told the Brisbane Courier Mail that the new rules were "a nightmare",

Summary: 1. The state government says the laws introduced at midnight are in place "to minimise the risk of alcohol-related harm".

Is the summary factually consistent with the document with respect to dates and times?
Options: "Yes" or "No"

Answer:


 Wrap the entire output in JSON format.
user