summarize the text below.
NAME_1 is expected to turn himself in to the Manhattan authorities today. Further down, you can read about the latest developments and what to expect today.

I also want to devote part of today’s newsletter to the other three criminal investigations of NAME_2 — because at least one of them could end up being more significant than the charges in Manhattan, both legally and politically.

Why?

For one thing, some legal experts view the Manhattan case skeptically. The closest analogy to it may be the 2012 trial of NAME_3, the former Democratic presidential candidate, who was accused of violating campaign-finance law by hiding payments to cover up an extramarital affair. Jurors acquitted NAME_4 of one charge and deadlocked on the others, a reminder that many people are uncomfortable criminalizing scandals that revolve around consensual sex.

The political impact of sex scandals is similarly questionable. NAME_2 has a long, public history of cheating on his wives, as any reader of New York’s tabloid newspapers knows. It did not keep him from being elected president any more than NAME_5’s reputation for infidelity kept him from winning in 1992. NAME_6 also lied about an affair while he was president — under oath, no less — but many Americans nonetheless believed he should remain in the job.

The case against NAME_2 could turn out differently, of course: He could be convicted. Even if he is, though, the charges do not seem likely to change many voters’ views of NAME_2.

Two of Provide your reponse without using the word case.
user