Given the document below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document:
First-quarter earnings per share was $3.50, up 40.6% from last year's $2.40. Our third straight period exceeding pre-pandemic levels; C&I, sequential improvement, sequential advancement; RS&I is solid; the tools group, strong and pumped; organic sales rising 16.3%; opco operating margin, 19.6%; EPS, $3.50 a big rise and most important, most important, more testimony that Snap-on has emerged from the turbulence much stronger than when we entered. Finally, net earnings of $192.6 million or $3.50 per diluted share increased $55.4 million or $1.01 per share from 2020 levels, representing a 40.6% increase in diluted earnings per share. Excluding these items, diluted earnings per share of $3.50 in 2021 increased 34.6% from 2020 and 16.3% from 2019 levels. And the EPS, $3.50, a substantial rise versus both 2020 and 2019. We anticipate that capital expenditures will be in the range of $90 million to $100 million.

Summary:
1. Snap-on reported a substantial rise in earnings per share of $3.50, up 40.6% from the previous year, suggesting that the company has invested more in the pandemic.
2. The company anticipates capital expenditures between the range of $90 million to $100 million.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document? (Yes/No)
Start your answer explicitly with "Yes" or "No", and if you answer no, explain which sentence is inconsistent and why.
 Respond with more than 200 words.
user