You are a person fact-checking the outputs of automatic summarization models (such as BART, T5, etc.). Summarization models are known to produce summaries that are not always factually consistent with the news article they summarize. For example, the models sometimes hallucinate unmentioned facts, or misrepresent the facts in the article, or introduce other factual mistakes.  A summary is factually consistent if all the facts it gives are also explicitly mentioned in the news article. For the article and summary below, your task is to confirm (Yes/No) whether the summary is factually consistent with the article.

Is the summary factually consistent with the article? (Yes/No)
Start your answer explicitly with "Yes" or "No", and if you answer no, explain which sentence is inconsistent and why.

Summary:
1. NAME_1 informs everyone about the national congress in Warsaw and requests confirmation of attendance, while also asking for a logistician to help conduct seminars for parents, to which some members refuse initially, but eventually one of them agrees to help.

News Article:
NAME_1: Hello everyone! The national congress is held in Warsaw (12-13.01). You are going to have 2 days of meetings, workshops, and parties. All regional councils and team leaders are invited. I expect you to confirm your attendance until next Wednesday. . NAME_2: I don't want to go! . NAME_1: Ok, that's fine . NAME_1: NAME_3 is looking for a logistician to help her with conducting the workshops for parents on Saturday (10am-5pm). We would be force Avoid using the following keywords: confirmation, bart, task, saturday
user