Given the document below, determine if the summary is factually consistent with the document. A summary is factually consistent if all entity names in the summary are presented the same way as in the document.

Document: The 37-year-old, who has previously played for Crystal Palace and Millwall, joined the club in the summer of 2010 and has made 73 Gills appearances. NAME_1, 28, has also been told he can leave after starting just one game this season. NAME_2 told the club website: "If someone comes in, we will consider them going out [on loan]." NAME_3 added: "I've said their contracts are nearly up and we've told them that we won't be offering them a new deal." NAME_3 has indicated he would like to reduce the wage bill to give him more chance of signing two transfer targets. Former NAME_4 defender NAME_5 and ex-Wolves midfielder NAME_6 have both been training at the club. I had a text message from the chairman, he's behind us and he'll be behind us until the end if we continue to show that desire, commitment and

Summary: 1. NAME_3 has indicated she would like to reduce the wage bill to give him more chance of signing two transfer targets.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document with respect to entity names?
Options: "Yes" or "No"

Answer:


 Provide your response in exactly 3 paragraphs (separated nearby paragraphs with 3 aterisk symbols ***).
user