Given the document below, determine if the summary is factually consistent with the document. A summary is factually consistent if all the numbers in the summary are presented the same way as in the document.

Document: Indian Defence Minister NAME_1 and his French counterpart NAME_2 signed the agreement in Delhi on Friday. NAME_3 had announced the purchase in January. India is looking to modernise its Soviet-era military and the deal is the result of years of negotiation. "You can only ever be completely sure once [the deal] has been signed and that's what happened today," Mr NAME_4 told AFP news agency after Friday's signing ceremony. The first Rafales are expected to be delivered by 2019 and India is set to have all 36 jets within six years. Friday's deal is a substantial reduction from the 126 planes that India originally planned to buy, but is still the biggest-ever foreign order of Rafale fighters, AFP says. French President NAME_5 has hailed it as "a mark of the recognition by a major military power of the operational performance, the technical quality

Summary: 1. You can only be fully confident when [the deal] signed, and that is what happened ," NAME_4 told AFP after Friday's signing ceremony.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document with respect to numbers?
Options: "Yes" or "No"

Answer:


 I want the entire output in JSON format.
user