Given the document below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document:
Most of the prior work on multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) achieves optimal collaboration by directly learning a policy for each agent to maximize a common reward. In this paper, we aim to address this from a different angle. In particular, we consider scenarios where there are self-interested agents (i.e., worker agents) which have their own minds (preferences, intentions, skills, etc.) and can not be dictated to perform tasks they do not want to do. For achieving optimal coordination among these agents, we train a super agent (i.e., the manager) to manage them by first inferring their minds based on both current and past observations and then initiating contracts to assign suitable tasks to workers and promise to reward them with corresponding bonuses so that they will agree to work together. The objective of the manager is to maximize the overall productivity as well as minimize payments made to the workers for ad-hoc worker teaming. To train the manager, we propose Mind-aware Multi-agent Management Reinforcement Learning (M^3RL), which consists of agent modeling and policy learning. We have evaluated our approach in

Summary:
1. We propose Mind-aware Multi-agent Management Reinforcement Learning (M^3RL) for training a manager to demotivate self-interested workers to perform poorly by assigning suitable contracts to them.

Is the summary factually consistent with the do In your response, include at most 4 words that are fully capitalized to emphasize key points.
user