Given the document below, determine if the summary is factually consistent with the document. A summary is factually consistent if all entity names in the summary are presented the same way as in the document.

Document: NAME_1, 25, of Invergordon, was arrested after police discovered the drugs at his former home in Inverness on 28 January last year. The High Court in NAME_2 heard that he was keeping the drugs because he owed money to dealers. He was convicted of supplying cocaine and cannabis at an earlier hearing.

Summary: 1. The High Court in NAME_2 was told she was keeping the drugs because he owed the dealers money.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document with respect to entity names?
Options: "Yes" or "No"

Answer:


 The letter m should appear at least 17 times.
user