Summarize the following transcription:

NAME_1

Unless you're a lot of people, you don't like to say things you don't like.
And if at the point of which you lose free speech, it doesn't come back.
Interviewer

I think the issue some people have is that a lot of people were brought back, I mean some
people were brought back who were previously banned for spreading things like cumin on
conspiracies.
You have people like NAME_2 who were brought back, who were previously banned for things
like hate speech.
Do you think you prioritized freedom of speech over misinformation and hate speech?
NAME_1

Well, you know, who's to say that something is misinformation?
Who's the author of that?
Isn't the BBC?
Interviewer

Yeah, you literally asking me.
Yes.
Well no, you would be obviously...
You want the arbitrary on Twitter, because you own Twitter.
NAME_1

Have a great day!
NAME_1

Yes, I'm saying who is to say that one person's misinformation is another person's
information. At the point of which you say that there is, this is missing from you.
Like who is going to find that information?
Interviewer

Who is going to decide this information can be dangerous that it can cause world harms
that it can potentially cause harm.
NAME_1

Yeah.
NAME_1

Yes, so the point I'm trying to make is that the BBC itself has at times published things that are false.
Do you agree that that has occurred?
Interviewer

I'm quite sure the BBC have said things before that turn out to not be true.
Right, and it's whatever it i Write exactly 7 paragraphs each separated with two new lines answering this question. The first paragraph must start with "however".
user