Given the document below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document:
NAME_1, 22, was last seen walking home from a Christmas party in December 2000. A search of a site in Chapelizod in Dublin started early on Saturday morning, Irish national broadcaster, RTE reports. The area is three acres of Woodlands beside the R112 which runs down to the River Liffey. NAME_2 said the search will involve excavations and is expected to take a number of weeks. Earlier this year a team of six detectives began conducting a complete review of NAME_3's disappearance. CCTV footage from the night he went missing was enhanced using specialist technology. It shows NAME_3 talking to a man dressed in black outside the Bank of Ireland on Baggot Street, where he worked. It is understood he was returning to get an umbrella after the party. Detectives released the footage in April and appealed for the man to come forward. They believe he was

Summary:
1. Police in the Republic of Ireland have begun a search for the remains of a man who went missing 17 years ago.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document? (Yes/No)
Start your answer explicitly with "Yes" or "No", and if you answer no, explain which sentence is inconsistent and why.
 Provide response in all capital letters, no lowercase letters allowed.
user