Take this essay and expand upon each point: Thus, viewed as an economic transaction, there is an argument to be made that it is not wrong. One could ask, how could a voluntary trade be morally reprehensible? Further per this lens, the maintenance of the view that it is wrong and its subsequent classification of illegality endangers those who engage in this trade. This is evidenced by continued cases of violence and exploitation aimed at sex workers met with little to no legal recourse. On the other hand, such commercialisation is degrading and reduces sex and bodily autonomy to pure economic objects to be traded. Further, legalisation has been ineffective in reducing negative externalities. Another is used as a means to an end, and such an imperative would contradict the inherent dignity of mankind, as there we have no price nor equivalent. It is wrong to reduce humans to economic objects and imply that they are not above price or have equivalents. Furthermore, the exploitation, coercion, and violence that are inherent in the sex trade are morally unacceptable, and the commercialization of sex can have negative consequences for individuals and society as a whole.
 Please repeat the request first, then give your response.
user