Given the document below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document:
Seven female students, some of whom attend Brigham Young University in Utah, were catfished by the same 24-year-old woman who was pretending to be a man. The victims all believed they were involved in a relationship with a Mormon man living in the same state - only to find out they were being duped by a woman named NAME_1 in Texas. And the women had a chance to confront the woman, named NAME_1, on an episode of NAME_2 that aired on Friday. Scroll down for videos . Seven women who were all believed to be in an online relationship with the same man found out that they had been catfished by a 24-year-old woman in Texas named NAME_1. NAME_1 apologized to the women, saying she was trying to figure out who she was because it's 'difficult' to be both gay and Mormon. 'Can I ask what triggered this in

Summary:
1. Seven female students, some of whom attend Brigham Young University in Utah, were catfished by the same 24 - year - old woman.
2. The victims all believed they were involved in a relationship with a Mormon man living in the same state - only to find out they were being duped by a woman named NAME_1.
3. The women had a chance to confront the woman, named NAME_1, on an episode of NAME_2 that aired on Friday.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document? (Yes/No)
Start your answer explicitly with "Yes" or "No", and if you answer no, explain which sentence is inconsistent and why.
 Limit your response to 200 words.
user