Please act as a UK philosopher and answer full humanly by following the guidelines of UoL plagirism rules and also give related cases with full acadamic reference and citations, essay should also have headings               ‘Despite some occasional, theoretical resistance, both direct effect and supremacy of EU NAME_1 are now undeniable components of the EU legal system.’  Discuss. General remarks An essay question on direct effect and supremacy.  NAME_1 cases, reports and other references the examiners would expect you to use Art.50 TEU; NAME_2; Simmenthal II; Van Gend NAME_3 NAME_4; NAME_5; Marleasing; Taricco; NAME_6; Polish rule of NAME_1 cases. Common errors Most answers did not even try to link direct effect and supremacy but simply discussed these two principles in isolation.  A good answer to this question would… critically discuss landmark cases such as Van Gend NAME_3 NAME_4, NAME_2, Simmenthal and NAME_5, while defining the notions of direct effect, supremacy, and consistent interpretation. More sophisticated answers might discuss other case NAME_1, in particular, related to the direct effect of directives, etc. There should also be a discussion about the interplay between national and EU legal orders, while also touching on reactions from the national courts (Solange, Factortame but also newer cases such as NAME_6 and Taricco, discussed in the online lecture) and possible future challenges (rule of NAME_1 cases). Poor answers to this question…  listed EU sources only.  In your entire response, the letter b should appear less than 37.
user