I will now describe the logic for determining wildfire smoke and provide a text，you need to use the logic to make logical corrections for the provided text and output your thought process and the logically corrected text.
The logic for determining wildfire smoke is as follows:
1. If flames or smoke caused by a fire are visible in the image, the conclusion is "Yes"
2. If there is no smoke caused by a fire visible in the image, such as smoke emanating from a chimney, the conclusion is "No"
3. If it is uncertain whether the image depicts flames and smoke, the conclusion is "Not Sure". Uncertainty may arise in the following situations:
a. Overexposed yellow or white patches in a dark environment where it is difficult to determine if they represent actual flames based on surrounding environmental information.
b. No flames appeared in the image, only white smoke, and it was not possible to determine whether the smoke was caused by a fire by using information about the surrounding environment.
It should be noted that if the color of the smoke is not white, and the smoke is not discharged from the chimney, the conclusion should be "Yes".
Here is the text:{Conclusion: No}{Description: There is no flame, there is smoke. Smoke appears on the factory wall in the distance. The smoke is white. Since the smoke was obscured by distant factory buildings, it was impossible to tell whether the smoke was caused by a fire. Power transmission facilities are present in the diagram. In the far middle of the image, there are transmission towers connected to overhead lines. The overhead line is longitudinally through.}{Impact: No impact. The smoke in the image is too far away from the camera and the transmission tower, and does not affect the transmission line.} Write your response with exactly 3 paragraphs, separated with the markdown divider: ***.
user