Given the document below, determine if the summary is factually consistent with the document. A summary is factually consistent if all the numbers in the summary are presented the same way as in the document.

Document: Police had been monitoring the group from Kosovo for months amid concerns they were planning to join Islamist militants in Syria, reports said. But police moved in at dawn on Thursday amid fears of a potential attack in the wake of the last week's murder of four people in London, reports said. Twelve addresses were raided including 10 in the city's historic centre. One of the raids took place close to the famed La Fenice opera house at around 04:00 (02:00 GMT), Italian media said. Police said all four of those held had Italian residence permits. They said Italy's specialist Digos crime squad had been investigating the three adults on suspicion of radicalisation. Two of the three had been working as waiters, one report said. Italian police apparently tapped communications referring to the 22 March attack at Westminster, when NAME_1 drove a car into pedestrians and stabbed a police

Summary: 1. London Minister NAME_2 praised the authorities' handling of the operation and said it showed their commitment in the fight against terrorism.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document with respect to numbers?
Options: "Yes" or "No"

Answer:


 Do not say the word "waiter" in the response
user