Given the document below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document:
NAME_1 E: Um so this might be What next ? Professor B: Well you tell me , so in terms of the uh planner what 's what 's a good one to do ? NAME_1 E: Well let 's th this go there or not I think is a good one . Professor B: Uh NAME_1 E: Is a very basic one . So what makes things more likely that Professor B: Well the fir see the first thing is , getting back to thing we left out of the other is the actual discourse . NAME_1 E: So Professor B: So NAME_2 this is gonna get into your world because uh we 're gonna want to know you know , which constructions indicate various of these properties NAME_3: Mm - hmm . Mm - hmm . Professor B: s and so I I don't yet know how to do this , I guess we 're gonna wind up pulling out uh discourse properties like we have object properties and we don't know what they are yet . NAME_1

Summary:
1. NAME_1 E suggested that identifying whether a person wants to physically go to a location or just find out how to get there with the intention of going is not important in making the Go-there decision.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document? (Yes/No)
Start your answer explicitly with "Yes" or "No", and if you answer no, explain which sentence is inconsistent and why.
 The letter q should appear at least 24 times.
user