Given the document below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document:
Hello, everyone. It is NAME_1 and a fell here Return of the champ. Shut the fuck up. Oh my God, he's just really pretty. We'ii. Just were we everyone everyone else gave up everyone else gave up. I kept it. He gave up Alonzo. I always kept it open for him. Everyone gave up this, you know even be I was like, you know, NAME_2 board is probably not going to be on the team not putting any faith in NAME_2 board and then all of a sudden we were like, nope screw this we're ready to get our hearts broken NAME_3's going to eat that snack every night every night NAME_4 tweets. I've been tweeting about NAME_4 been thinking about him. I was just came home. I'm literally on the road home from Tennessee Titans Patriots joint practices. I've been thinking about NAME_4 and how long would use just throw into gonna cross you see whatever his name is and that guy. Okay, no fuck contrl. Oh, no. No, he has a family he has a

Summary:
1. The document is a social media post discussing the addition of NAME_4 to the Patriots team.
2. They discuss his potential impact as a tight end and how he fits into the team's offense.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document? (Yes/No)
Start your answer explicitly with "Yes" or "No", and if you answer no, explain which sentence is inconsistent and why.
 Respond with more than 15 words be in all capital letters.
user