Given the document below, determine if the summary is factually consistent with the document. Together with the answer provide your reasoning. 

Document: NAME_1 is suing the Irish state after twice being questioned over the killing of NAME_2 Plantier. The 39-year-old producer was found by two neighbours beaten to death on a hillside outside her holiday home in a remote part of west Cork in 1996. NAME_3 denies any involvement in the death and was never charged. Under cross-examination in the High Court in Dublin, the 57-year-old was forced to recount his history of violence and a litany of injuries his partner NAME_4 suffered at his hands. Admitting he had been "seriously violent" towards his NAME_5-born artist girlfriend three times, NAME_3 said they separated for several months in mid-1996 after she sought a protection order against him. "It's common knowledge, to my eternal shame, that in the past when I used to drink spirits, that to my eternal shame, that I was involved in incidents of domestic

Summary: 1. The 39-year-old producer was found by two neighbours beaten to death on a hillside outside his holiday home in a remote part of west Cork in 1996.

Provide the reasoning and answer "Yes" or "No".

Reasoning:


 In your response, include at most 4 words that are fully capitalized to emphasize key points.
user