Context information is below. 
---------------------

If the NAME_1 optimizes the distances between objective values of solutions and the reference point, then such distances should also be considered in the augmentation term that sums them up over all objectives. Accounting for this term implies that the isoquants are slightly obtuse. As a result, without augmentation, solutions a and b in the figure have the same distance from the reference point.
This form should be adjusted to the primary function. If the NAME_1 optimizes the distances between objective values of solutions and the reference point, then such distances should also be considered in the augmentation term that sums them up over all objectives. Accounting for this term implies that the isoquants are slightly obtuse.
A small remark here is that this term can take various forms. This form should be adjusted to the primary function. If the NAME_1 optimizes the distances between objective values of solutions and the reference point, then such distances should also be considered in the augmentation term that sums them up over all objectives.
---------------------
Given the context information and not prior knowledge, merge information on NAME_1. You should write your response with 800 or more words.
user