Given the document below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document:
NAME_1, who joined Millwall from Plymouth in 2008, signed a new one-year deal to stay with NAME_2 until the end of next season on Thursday. The 33-year-old made 22 appearances for Millwall last season, helping them win promotion from League One. NAME_1 is Dons manager NAME_3's fifth signing since the end of last season. Find all the latest football transfers on our dedicated page.

Summary:
1. League One side MK Dons have signed Millwall midfielder NAME_4 on a free transfer on a two-year deal.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document? (Yes/No)
Start your answer explicitly with "Yes" or "No", and if you answer no, explain which sentence is inconsistent and why.
 First repeat the request without change, then give your answer.
user