Given the document below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document:
Last week she was barely showing - but NAME_1 is now the proud mother to the show's latest addition. Within ten minutes of tomorrow night's episode, fans will see Aidan NAME_2's dashing NAME_3 gaze lovingly at his new baby daughter. As Sunday night's latest heartthrob, women across the country have voiced their longing to settle down with the brooding NAME_4 gentleman - but unfortunately it seems as if his heart is well and truly off the market. Scroll down for video . Last week she was barely showing - but NAME_1 is now the proud mother to the show's latest addition . He may have married his red-headed kitchen maid out of duty, but as he tells her that she makes him a better man, audiences can have little doubt about his feelings. What is rather less convincing, however, is the timeline of the pregnancy. With the

Summary:
1. Last week she was barely showing - but NAME_1 is now the proud mother to the show's latest addition .
2. Within ten minutes of tomorrow night's episode, fans will see Aidan NAME_2's dashing NAME_3 gaze lovingly at his new baby daughter .
3. Women across the country have voiced their longing to settle down with the brooding NAME_4 gentleman .

Is the summary factually consistent with the document? (Yes/No)
Start your answer explicitly with "Yes" or "No", and if you answer no, explain which sentence is inconsistent and why.
 Provide your response in exactly 4 paragraphs (separated nearby paragraphs with 3 aterisk symbols ***).
user