Given the article below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with news article.

Is the summary factually consistent with the article? (Yes/No)
Start with Yes or No. If you say No, explain which sentence is inconsistent and why.

Summary:
[SUMMARY]

News Article:
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the ``Multiemployer Retirees Medical Equity Benefits Act of 1993''. SEC. 2. USE OF MULTIEMPLOYER PLAN CONTRIBUTIONS AND ASSETS FOR RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS. (a) General Rule.--Section 401 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by redesignating subsection (o) as subsection (p) and by inserting after subsection (n) the following new subsection: ``(o) Use of Multiemployer Plan Contributions for Retiree Health Benefits.-- ``(1) In general.--Amounts contributed to a multiemployer pension plan shall be treated for all purposes of this title as if they had been contributed directly by the contributing employers, pursuant to the designation of such employers, to a related retiree medical benefits plan if-- ``(A) the trustees of the multiemployer pension plan elect to transfer such amounts to such related retiree medical benefit plan; ``(B) such transfer is effected within 1 year after the close of the transfer year; ``(C) the amount transferred does not exceed the permissible amount; and ``(D) the amounts transferred in accordance with this subsection are used exclusively to provide health benefits for individuals (and their beneficiaries) who have begun receiving  Write your response with at least 150 words.
user