Given the document below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document:
Marketing: Is it easy to use ? Project Manager: I'm not sure . I'm not sure . User Interface: Yeah . User Interface: Well yeah , the voice recognition of course is hard to learn , I think . Well , hard it's not for the for the e for the elderly . They won't use it . Industrial Designer: Well , but there are two parts in this remote control . What you see here is is the basic part . Everybody can use it , so that's easy to use . Project Manager: Yeah . Industrial Designer: That's for a novice user . When you have a more advanced , elaborate user , well , such a user really would like to explore all these additional functions . So in that in that way it is advanced , Project Manager: Yeah . Industrial Designer: and I think it's easy to use for for both uh types of users . User Interface: I think I think a three . Industrial Designer: So uh It's maybe it's not very uh

Summary:
1. The group had a mixed opinion on whether the remote control was easy to use, with some members believing that it was easy for advanced users and some for novice users, while others believed that the advanced functions may be difficult.
2. There was also no mention of voice recognition being hard to learn.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document? (Yes/No)
Start your answer explicitly with "Yes" or "No", and if you answer no, explain which sentence is inconsistent and why.
 Do not say the word "industrial" in the response
user