Given the document below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document:
A video of a menacing crocodile swimming through a public marina with a dead pet dog locked in between its jaws has been viewed more than half a million times online. The clip shows a large croc calmly moving through the marina in the tourist hotspot of Puerto Vallarta, in Mexico, with a black dog wearing a red collar lifeless in its mouth. New Zealander NAME_1 was on holiday in Puerto Vallarta with his wife when the attack happened and described how 'the crocodile kept the dog in its mouth for ages, not moving at all'. Mr NAME_2 told Daily Mail Australia the dog belonged to the local bike shop's owner. Scroll down for video . The large croc proudly held on to its catch for hours as it lurked around the Puerto Vallarta marina, in Mexico . 'There's a sanctuary for these crocodiles up the river (200m away)

Summary:
1. new zealander NAME_1 was on holiday in puerto vallarta with his wife when he saw the alarming sight .
2. the clip shows a large croc calmly moving through the marina with a black dog wearing a red collar lifeless in its mouth .
3. social media users have reacted in horror to the video that was posted on the bogged facebook page .
4. one woman called the video 'horrible' and another said 'i hate crocodiles now'

Is the summary factually consistent with the document? (Yes/No)
Start your answer explicitly with "Yes" or "No", and if you answer no, explain which sentence is inconsistent and why.
 The letter x should appear at least 48 times.
user