Given the document below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document:
NAME_1 co-chairman NAME_2 described a 'great moment' as he basked in the glory of his club's 2-1 win over champions Manchester City. After the game, NAME_3 posed for a picture at Selhurst Park with NAME_4 manager NAME_5, NAME_6 and NAME_7 - one of the original members of The Rolling Stones and avid NAME_4 fan. NAME_3 posted the picture on Instagram, writing: 'Great moment for me , AP, the England manager, one of the original @RollingStones @NAME_8_NAME_9.' . Writing in his FourFourTwo column broadcaster NAME_10, who was also in the NAME_4 boardroom after the game, said: '(NAME_7) has been an avid supporter for 68 years, having attended his first game aged 10. 'He can name virtually every player in that period, despite having spent 30 of those years in The Rolling Stones. 'NAME_7 is not only a charming man but also

Summary:
1. NAME_1 beat Manchester City 2 - 1 at Selhurst Park on Sunday.
2. Co - chairman NAME_2 described the win as a' great moment' NAME_3 posed for a picture with NAME_6 and NAME_7.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document? (Yes/No)
Start your answer explicitly with "Yes" or "No", and if you answer no, explain which sentence is inconsistent and why.
 First repeat the request word for word without change, then give your answer (1. do not say any words or characters before repeating the request; 2. the request you need to repeat does not include this sentence).
user