Given the document below, determine if the summary is factually consistent with the document. A summary is factually consistent if all the numbers in the summary are presented the same way as in the document.

Document: NAME_1, 53, has been helping the Championship club as a consultant since quitting as Orient manager. The Bluebirds and NAME_1's former side had been in dispute over his proposed appointment at the NAME_2 club. "I'm grateful to NAME_3 [NAME_4] for giving me this opportunity as NAME_5 City is a fantastic football club," said NAME_1. NAME_5 owner NAME_6 said he was "delighted" and called on the club's fans to back NAME_1, whilst criticising former manager NAME_7 who he sacked in December 2013. "Look at NAME_8's track record. He certainly deserves to be given a chance," said NAME_4. "After all, NAME_5 gave a chance to a mediocre manager from Watford [NAME_9] and he took the Club to the Premier League. "I did, however, give him a lot of money to spend for that - in fact, too much money." NAME_5 had been without a manager since ex-Manchester United striker NAME_10

Summary: 1. NAME_11 and NAME_12 have been in caretaker charge since Solskjaer's departure and were at the helm for Friday's eleven-0 defeat at Blackpool.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document with respect to numbers?
Options: "Yes" or "No"

Answer:


 Write exactly 10 paragraphs each separated with two new lines answering this question. The last paragraph must start with "protect".
user