Given the document below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document:
It was a real-life fairytale - the moment, 70 years ago, when two carefully guarded princesses were let loose to join the jubilant crowds in London celebrating the end of the Second World War in Europe. Now the adventure has been re-created in a new film, showing the young Princesses NAME_1 and NAME_2 as they wander incognito through the city streets. And among the most curious viewers of A Royal Night Out, released next month to coincide with the anniversary of VE Day on May 8, 1945, will be a woman who knows better than anyone what really happened on that extraordinary night. Scroll down for video . Royal Role: Canadian NAME_3, left. plays a young Princess NAME_1, pictured right. Dancing NAME_4: NAME_3 as Princess NAME_1 enjoying a night out to celebrate the end of the Second World War. Because she was there. 'It was a NAME_5 moment

Summary:
1. A Royal Night Out is released next month to coincide with the anniversary of VE Day on May 8, 1945.
2. It stars Canadian actress NAME_3 as the future NAME_4 and British newcomer NAME_6 as Princess NAME_2.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document? (Yes/No)
Start your answer explicitly with "Yes" or "No", and if you answer no, explain which sentence is inconsistent and why.
 Provide response in all capital letters, no lowercase letters allowed.
user