Given the document below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document:
Hi everyone. This is NAME_1 from a liquidy place for anchor. If you haven't heard about anger, it's the easiest way to make a podcast. It's free that's huge. There's creation tools that allow you to record and edit your podcast right from your phone, which is kind of incredible or your computer. Of course anchor will distribute your podcast for you. So you can be heard on Spotify Apple podcasts and all the rest you can make money from your podcast with Minimum listenership. It's everything you need to make a podcast in one place download the free anchor app or go to Anchor dot. F m-- to get started. It's the way we make our shows and we enjoy using it. Thanks. Hello and welcome back to nothing. But a NAME_2 thing I am NAME_3 and he is NAME_1. I'm NAME_4 the brave. Yeah, I mean you're brave in your own way. I mean, I think you're brave enough. I get out of the house every day. That's pretty brave. If I say so but you

Summary:
1. The document begins with an introduction to Anchor, a paid podcast creation tool that allows users to record and edit on their phone or computer and distribute on various platforms.
2. The second half of the document discusses a news story about NAME_5's sculptures being featured in a museum exhibition, as well as a Twitter question about last memories of NAME_5.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document? (Yes/No)
Start your answer  Provide two versions of response separated with exactly 6 asterisk symbols: ******.
user