Given the document below, determine if the summary is factually consistent with the document.
A summary is factually consistent if all statements in the summary are entailed by the document.

Document: Young and photogenic, though not known as particularly dynamic, he has a reputation for "clean politics". His government faced major protests in 2010 which paralysed parts of the capital and left more than 90 people dead. Distinctly upper-class, NAME_1 hails from a wealthy family of Thai-Chinese origin. Both his parents were medical professors. He was born in the British city of Newcastle in August 1964 and educated at England's top public school, NAME_2. He then went on to gain a degree in politics, philosophy and economics (PPE) at Oxford University. NAME_1's support is drawn mainly from southern Thailand and from Bangkok's educated middle-classes. He has had less success in attracting the support of working class and rural Thais. In 1992, NAME_1 joined Thailand's oldest party, the Democrats, and at the age of 27, entered parliament as one of its youngest ever members. Having tried and failed to become party leader in 2001, he eventually got the post in 2005. Championing a raft of populist policies, NAME_1 campaigned under the slogan "Putting People First". The Democrat Party

Summary: 1. At age 44, she became the country's youngest prime minister in more than 50 years.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document?
Start your answer with "Yes" or "No".

Answer:


 There should be exactly 6 paragraphs separated by the markdown divider: ***.
user