Given the document below, determine if the summary is factually consistent with the document. A summary is factually consistent if all entity names in the summary are presented the same way as in the document.

Document: On Saturday a man brought the animal into a branch of Lidl on the Glenmanus Road in NAME_1. NAME_2, a book shop owner from Belfast, was in the store while on a camping trip with his family when he saw the unusual customer. He said the man was asked to leave the shop but pointed out that the sign simply said "no dogs" and did not mention sheep. NAME_3 said: "Other shoppers were incredulous, but seeing how we are used to all sorts coming to our book shop it didn't faze my wife and daughter at all." He said he spoke to the man outside the shop who "claimed that his charge was one of triplets, and he'd had her from she was three days old and had saved her from the abattoir". When asked about the incident, a police spokesperson said a man was "arrested on suspicion

Summary: 1. Mr. NAME_1 said, "The other buyers were incredulous, but the fact that we were used to everything that comes to our bookstore did not bother my wife and daughter in the least."

Is the summary factually consistent with the document with respect to entity names?
Options: "Yes" or "No"

Answer:


 Please repeat the request first, then give your response.
user