Given the document below, determine if the summary is factually consistent with the document. A summary is factually consistent if all the dates and times in the summary are presented the same way as in the document.

Document: Developers wanted to build the 100m high turbines near Romanno Bridge in Peebleshire. Stevenson Hill Wind Energy, on behalf of West Coast Energy, also applied to construct a new access road from the A701. The application drew 125 letters of objection and one of support. They wanted to build the turbines along the ridges of the peaks of Green Knows, Hag NAME_1 and Wether NAME_1. Members of the Scottish Borders Council's planning applications committee raised concerns about its visual impact on the landscape and neighbouring communities. Archaeologists had also claimed it would cause unacceptable harm to four scheduled monuments of national importance and a historic landscape of "at least regional importance". Planning officials advised councillors to reject the scheme on landscape impact and potential noise nuisance grounds.

Summary: 1. Scottish Borders Council Applications Committee members have expressed concerns about its visual impact on the landscape and neighboring communities.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document with respect to dates and times?
Options: "Yes" or "No"

Answer:


 Respond with at most 150 words.
user