Given the document below, determine if the summary is factually consistent with the document. A summary is factually consistent if all the numbers in the summary are presented the same way as in the document.

Document: More than 500 people in the city of Albano Laziale shouted "murderer" and "executioner", and clashed with Nazi sympathisers, as his coffin passed. The former German SS officer, who was jailed for life in 1998 over the killing of more than 300 civilians, died under house arrest last week. His death led to fierce debate over what to do with his body. That question remains after the funeral was suspended on Tuesday evening. The exact reason for the halt in the ceremony is unclear, although NAME_1's lawyer, NAME_2, said it had been stopped because the authorities had prevented friends and family entering. The agency quoted NAME_3 as saying that the funeral was "a moment of mourning" that had nothing to do with politics. NAME_1 was one of the SS officers present during the killing of men and boys at Rome's Ardeatine Caves in 1944, in a reprisal attack

Summary: 1. He wasn't then extradited to Italy and jailed - but because of his age and poor health he was allowed to serve his sentence under house arrest in Rome.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document with respect to numbers?
Options: "Yes" or "No"

Answer:


 Write your response with exactly 5 paragraphs, separated with the markdown divider: ***.
user