Context: 
To say that NAME_1 evoked fear and loathing in establishment boardrooms is to understate the case considerably.
How can NAME_1 look at himself in the mirror every day knowing how many employees he has harmed?
NAME_2 is a man of God.
What is the corporate succession plan should something happen to NAME_1?
Is it true conservatives are mad at NAME_1 because of his position on CO2?
Please get a copy of this new "Final" to NAME_1.
Also, NAME_3 seems a man in a hurry.
NAME_1 may have chaged it a bit.
How much money did NAME_1 help raise for NAME_4's presidential primary campaign?
Do you think NAME_5 really "gets" what you are trying to say??
It's time to ditch NAME_5.
I heard NAME_6 just then; "NAME_1 is behind that."
You are so incredibly good to NAME_2!!
Page Two December 5, 2001 I personally can't blame the fall of the company on NAME_1.
I am writing you because prior to working for Enron, NAME_1 and Enron were synonymous.
I don't have a transcript or recording of NAME_2's comments.
Re: the other question that you asked about NAME_1's name appearing in a press release, he said that is fine.
Did NAME_1 write the NAME_4 campaign proposal on CO2?
IN THE NEWS NAME_1 was the cover story for the April 2001 issue of Continental Magazine.
"NAME_1 is a noted business >leader in Texas who has > long been active in Republican politics.
But that old scoundrel had played too many scams This one he could not hide as Chucks lawyers and guides Went over NAME_5's books and found such a surprise.

        Answer Wrap the entire output in JSON format.
user