Given the document below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document:
This is the moment a middle-aged woman ran over and killed her husband in China after he climbed out of their car and she accidentally reversed over him. NAME_1, 50, and her husband NAME_2, 53, were going shopping when she parked the car outside the local supermarket in the city of Fuzhou, in Fujian province, south east China. CCTV from the scene shows NAME_3 climbing out of the passenger door and going to stand behind the car when his wife suddenly reverses, knocking him down before backing up over his body. . NAME_4, 50, was going shopping in the Chinese city of Fuzhou, in the south eastern province of Fujian, when she parked her car and her husband climbed out the passenger side. Thinking his wife had stopped, Mr NAME_5 walked around and stood behind the vehicle just as she reversed, knocking him to the

Summary:
1. NAME_4, 50, parked her car and husband NAME_2, 53, climbed out.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document? (Yes/No)
Start your answer explicitly with "Yes" or "No", and if you answer no, explain which sentence is inconsistent and why.
 There should be exactly 4 paragraphs separated by the markdown divider: ***.
user