Given the article below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with news article.

Is the summary factually consistent with the article? (Yes/No)
Start with Yes or No. If you say No, explain which sentence is inconsistent and why.

Summary:
1. NAME_1 invites his friends to watch the movie "Metropolis" but ends up being accused of just using them for their popcorn machines.
2. Eventually, only NAME_2 agrees to watch the movie with NAME_1.

News Article:
NAME_1: Would any of you like to watch the 1920s classic "Metropolis" with me? I recently downloaded it - the remastered version, high quality, and I just have my computer sooo anyone up for it? . NAME_3: so you just want to use us for our big screen TVs :( NAME_4: Don't we mean anything to you anymore???? ;(((((( NAME_4: But yeah, sure. . NAME_3: I've seen it once a long time ago, could watch it again. NAME_4: Obviously NAME_1's gonna choose whoever has the bigger tv :P . NAME_3: and who will that be? :O NAME_4: you . NAME_3: YASS! My dreams have come true :NAME_5: I didn't think my question would lead to such a dramatic exchange, but thanks :NAME_6: Apparently you don't really know us that well
 In your response, capitalize a few words to stress main points. Please limit the number of words with all capital letters to less than 4.
user