You are a journalist fact-checking the summary of a document to be published. Given the document below, you have to determine if the summary is factually consistent with the document. A summary is factually consistent if all statements in the summary are entailed by the document.

Example Document: NAME_1 remains on course to win a record-equaling 22nd grand slam title after beating American NAME_2 in straight sets in the Australian Open semifinals Friday, setting up a mouthwatering final with NAME_3. The Serbian faced stiff opposition from the big-hitting NAME_4 in his 7-5 6-1 6-2 victory to reach his 33rd grand slam final. His victory came just hours after Tsitsipas had beaten Russian NAME_5 Khachanov 7-6 (7-2) 6-4 6-7 (6-8) 6-3 to reach his second career grand slam final.

Example Summary 1: NAME_1 will face NAME_3 in the Australian Open final after beating NAME_2 in straight sets.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document?
Start your answer with "Yes" or "No".

Answer: Yes. The summary is factually consistent with the article.


Example Summary 2: NAME_1 won a record-equaling 22nd grand slam title after beating NAME_2 in straight sets at the Australian Open on Friday.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document?
Start your answer with "Yes" or "No".

Answer: No, the summary is not factually consistent.



You are a journalist fact-checking the summary of a document to be published. Given the document below, you have to determin First repeat the request word for word without change, then give your answer (1. do not say any words or characters before repeating the request; 2. the request you need to repeat does not include this sentence).
user