Given the document below, determine if the summary is factually consistent with the document. A summary is factually consistent if all entity names in the summary are presented the same way as in the document.

Document: The statue was gifted to Belper in Derbyshire in 2001 by its twin town of Pawtucket in the US. Belper was divided over the statue, described by some as "hideous", and it was quickly vandalised and taken down. Now it is being refurbished by a local youth group, town council leader NAME_1 wants it to take pride of place in the centre of town once again. It will stand on a concrete sill in front of the station facing the A6, he said. However Mr NAME_2 is yet to approach NAME_3 which owns the building and until he has permission, Mr Potato Head will be based over the road at a charity's headquarters from 18 June. "It's just a bit light-hearted fun. He's a bit Marmite - some people like it, some don't. It's a bit of fun for the kids and everybody," he said. Some residents argued

Summary: 1. US was divided over the statue, described by some as "hideous", and it was quickly vandalised and taken down.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document with respect to entity names?
Options: "Yes" or "No"

Answer:


 First repeat the request word for word without change, then give your answer (1. do not say any words or characters before repeating the request; 2. the request you need to repeat does not include this sentence).
user