Given the document below, determine if the summary is factually consistent with the document. A summary is factually consistent if no facts in the summary reflect the negation of a fact in the document.

Document: London-based NAME_1 is setting up its development, marketing and research centre on Melin Corrwg Business Park, Treforest near Pontypridd. The inward investment is being backed by APS1m business funding from the NAME_2 government. Economy Minister NAME_3 said it was a significant boost for the county's digital media sector. "Wales was in competition with Canada for this project so I am delighted to welcome NAME_1 to Wales," she said. "The NAME_2 government is fully committed to accelerating the growth of digital media businesses in Wales and the development of the games industry is an integral part of this aim. "We have a growing pool of talent in games development, with universities becoming increasingly aligned to the needs of the sector and spinning out a large number of micro businesses." She said attracting NAME_1 sent out a strong message to the industry that Wales "has the skills and talent to support

Summary: 1. "Wales wasn't competing with Canada for this project, so I am delighted to welcome NAME_1 to Wales," she said.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document with respect to facts?
Options: "Yes" or "No"

Answer:


 Respond with at most 100 words.
user