Given the document below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document:
NAME_1 also called on ministers to gather accurate data on the number of children who go hungry because they do not have access to free meals during school holidays. About 255,230 pupils are registered for free school meals in Scotland. The government said it was "taking steps" to measure food insecurity. NAME_2 paid tribute to charities such as the NAME_3 Trust, which has begun a pilot project in Glasgow to offer cookery lessons to parents struggling to make ends meet during the holidays. He told the BBC's Good Morning Scotland programme: "There shouldn't be stigma attached to having basic rights to food. "The obligation is on the state to make sure that every child in Scotland is getting access to the food, the education, the healthcare, everything that they need. And that shouldn't be a problem in the holidays. "The more support we can provide to the NAME_3

Summary:
1. Scotland's children's commissioner has said there should be no stigma attached to the right to food.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document? (Yes/No)
Start your answer explicitly with "Yes" or "No", and if you answer no, explain which sentence is inconsistent and why.
 Provide response in all capital letters, no lowercase letters allowed.
user