Given the document below, determine if the summary is factually consistent with the document.
A summary is factually consistent if all statements in the summary are entailed by the document.

Document: NAME_1, 30, was working at Bromsgrove School when he contacted two students outside of school hours. He was suspended on 9 December 2014 - nearly a month after staff learned of allegations - and resigned days later. A National College for Teaching and Leadership panel found he had acted in a way that could bring the profession into disrepute. The prohibition order prevents him from teaching in any school, sixth form college, youth accommodation or children's home in England, and cannot be appealed against for three years. Mr NAME_2, who had worked at the school for five years, was found by the panel to have singled out one of the pupils when she did not respond to his messages, and also offered to hold her up when she was doing pull-ups with other pupils. They also judged the teacher knew his contact with the students "was inappropriate and in

Summary: 1. NAME_1, days later, was working at Bromsgrove School when he contacted two students outside of school hours.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document?
Start your answer with "Yes" or "No".

Answer:


 Provide your response in exactly 6 paragraphs (separated nearby paragraphs with 3 aterisk symbols ***).
user