Given the document below, determine if the summary is factually consistent with the document. A summary is factually consistent if all the numbers in the summary are presented the same way as in the document.

Document: The move follows a proposal to slash 10% from MPs' salaries and ministry spending, and to use billions of dollars from an emergency fund. Russia's economy has been badly hit by low oil prices and Western sanctions over NAME_1's role in Ukraine's crisis. It was not clear when the cuts would come into effect, and whether they would cover NAME_2's own pay. The move is presumably meant to set an example, as Russia enters difficult economic times, the BBC's NAME_3 in NAME_1 reports. It is all part of a broader austerity drive, she says, as Russia's income has shrunk along with the falling oil price. Western sanctions over the Ukraine conflict are also biting. In a brief statement on Friday, the NAME_4 said permanent members of Russia's security council discussed "a number of social and economic issues". It added that NAME_2 informed the council about his decision

Summary: 1. Mr NAME_1 appealed to their patriotism to back proposal.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document with respect to numbers?
Options: "Yes" or "No"

Answer:


 There should be exactly 2 paragraphs separated by the markdown divider: ***.
user