Question: Why is NAME_1's account of sovereignty generally considered to be more sophisticated - and more acceptable - than NAME_2's?
A: Because NAME_1's Utilitarianism redeems his account of sovereignty.
B: Because NAME_2 overlooks the significance of morality.
C: Because NAME_1 recognizes the possibility of limiting the sovereign's power.
D: Because NAME_2 incorporates power-conferring rules into his concept of the sovereign's commands.
Please eliminate two incorrect options first, then think it step by step and choose the most proper one option. Your answer should have exactly 4 paragraphs. Make sure that the last paragraph starts with the word "help" and that each paragraph is separated by two new lines.
user