NAME_1 NAME_2 (NAME_3), there is the concept of differentiating between humans and "animals". The books deeply explore what it means to be human. It seems that the bene gesserit certainly had a very specific set of criteria NAME_1 mind NAME_1 the first book. Later, NAME_4 II seemed to adhere a broader definition of what it means to be human. Do you agree? Can you please infer what their  of a "human" and "animal" could be? Give two different versions of responses. Please separate the responses with 6 asterisk symbols: ******.
user