Given the document below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document:
NAME_1 midfielder NAME_2 is relishing the prospect of a long-awaited Wembley appearance after injury robbed him of the chance three years ago. The Reds made three trips to the national stadium in 2012 after winning the League Cup and losing the FA Cup to Chelsea, but the Brazil international missed all of them with a serious knee injury sustained in the previous November. But having played his part in the 1-0 quarter-final win at Blackburn, NAME_3 is hoping to get his chance in the last-four encounter with NAME_4 on April 19. NAME_2 (right) celebrates with NAME_1 manager NAME_5 after getting to the FA Cup semi-final. NAME_3 (left) challenges NAME_6 as NAME_1 beat Blackburn 1-0 in the FA Cup quarter-final replay. NAME_3 can play his first game at Wembley in a NAME_1 shirt when they meet NAME_4 in the semi-final. 'Unfortunately I got an injury

Summary:
1. NAME_1 beat Blackburn 1 - 0 in the FA Cup quarter - final replay at Ewood Park.
2. NAME_2 is hoping to play his first game at Wembley in a NAME_1 shirt in the semi - final against NAME_4 on April 19.
3. The Brazil international missed three trips to the national stadium in 2012 with a serious knee injury sustained in the previous November.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document? (Yes/No)
Start your answer explicitly with "Yes" or "No", and if you answer no, explain which sentence is inconsistent and why.
 Your answer should have exactly 6 paragraphs. Make sure that the first paragraph starts with the word "difficult" and that each paragraph is separated by two new lines.
user