Given the document below, determine if the summary is factually consistent with the document. A summary is factually consistent if all the numbers in the summary are presented the same way as in the document.

Document: NAME_1 is suing the Irish state after twice being questioned over the killing of NAME_2 NAME_3. The 39-year-old producer was found by two neighbours beaten to death on a hillside outside her holiday home in a remote part of west Cork in 1996. NAME_4 denies any involvement in the death and was never charged. Under cross-examination in the High Court in Dublin, the 57-year-old was forced to recount his history of violence and a litany of injuries his partner NAME_5 suffered at his hands. Admitting he had been "seriously violent" towards his NAME_6-born artist girlfriend three times, NAME_4 said they separated for several months in mid-1996 after she sought a protection order against him. "It's common knowledge, to my eternal shame, that in the past when I used to drink spirits, that to my eternal shame, that I was involved in incidents of domestic

Summary: 1. The 39-year-old producer was found by two neighbours beaten to death on a hillside outside his holiday home in a remote part of west Cork in 1996.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document with respect to numbers?
Options: "Yes" or "No"

Answer:


 Write exactly 6 paragraphs each separated with two new lines answering this question. The last paragraph must start with "recover".
user