Given the document below, determine if the summary is factually consistent with the document. A summary is factually consistent if all entity names in the summary are presented the same way as in the document.

Document: Some suggested it was an alien invasion, while others thought it may have been some sort of aircraft. It was, in fact, a "sporadic meteor" according to NAME_1 from the Armagh Observatory. "This doesn't look like it's associated with any of the meteor showers of the year," he said. "On average, we can see something this bright, if we are lucky, once a year," he said. "The sparks we saw behind the meteor were bits falling off - the stress of our atmosphere causes it to disintegrate". The meteor was recorded at 22:10 BST on Sunday evening, moving north west towards Scotland, where it was also observed.

Summary: 1. "The sparks we saw behind the meteor were bits falling off - the stress of our atmosphere causes it to disintegrate".

Is the summary factually consistent with the document with respect to entity names?
Options: "Yes" or "No"

Answer:


 Provide your response in exactly 2 paragraphs (separated nearby paragraphs with 3 aterisk symbols ***).
user