Given the document below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document:
an oregon woman who came home and beat her boyfriend 's former girlfriend with a crowbar after finding her getting high on heroin in her bathroom will no longer face prosecution . NAME_1 of portland was seven-months pregnant when she was charged with second-degree assault after she struck her boyfriend 's ex in the head and arm with a crowbar in november 2014 . she was set to go to trial in multnomah county circuit court this week , but prosecutors dropped the charge on monday because NAME_2 , 23 , was ` completely justified in her outrage ' . NAME_1 of portland , oregon , was seven-months pregnant when she was charged with second-degree assault after she struck her boyfriend 's ex in the head and arm with a crowbar in november 2014 NAME_2 gave birth in january . when NAME_3 home , she found her

Summary:
1. NAME_1 of portland was seven-months pregnant when she was charged with second-degree assault after she struck her boyfriend 's ex in the head and arm with a crowbar in november 2014 . 
she was set to go to trial in multnomah county circuit court this week , but prosecutors dropped the charge on monday because NAME_2 was ` completely justified in her outrage ` 
NAME_2 's defense attorney said the ex-girlfriend was jealous and bitter that the boyfriend was in a relationship with his client .

Is the summary factually consistent with the document? (Yes/No)
Start your answer explicitly with "Yes" or "No", and if you answer no, explain which sentence is inconsistent and why.
 Write your answer without using the letter m whatsoever in your entire response.
user