You are a person fact-checking the outputs of automatic summarization models (such as BART, T5, etc.). Summarization models are known to produce summaries that are not always factually consistent with the news article they summarize. For example, the models sometimes hallucinate unmentioned facts, or misrepresent the facts in the article, or introduce other factual mistakes.  A summary is factually consistent if all the facts it gives are also explicitly mentioned in the news article. For the article and summary below, your task is to confirm (Yes/No) whether the summary is factually consistent with the article.

News Article:
NAME_1: Can you suggest any Italian music? . NAME_2: lol, why? . NAME_3: I really dislike Italian pop . NAME_2: it's as shitty as any pop nowadays . NAME_1: I've started learning Italian . NAME_1: so it would be nice to listen to something real sometimes . NAME_2: Try NAME_4 . NAME_1: thanks, I'll try it . NAME_2: he's a big star with easy lyrics . NAME_1: sounds perfect, heh

Summary:
1. NAME_1 requests Italian music recommendations and NAME_2 suggests NAME_4, a well-liked artist with straightforward lyrics.
2. NAME_3 communicates his dislike for Italian pop music.

Is the summary factually consistent with the article? (Yes/No)
Start your answer explicitly with "Yes" or "No", and if you answer no, explain which sentence is inconsistent and why.
 The response should be in all capital letters.
user