Given the document below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document:
First-quarter earnings per share was $3.50, up 40.6% from last year's $2.40. Our third straight period exceeding pre-pandemic levels; C&I, sequential improvement, sequential advancement; RS&I is solid; the tools group, strong and pumped; organic sales rising 16.3%; opco operating margin, 19.6%; EPS, $3.50 a big rise and most important, most important, more testimony that Snap-on has emerged from the turbulence much stronger than when we entered. Finally, net earnings of $192.6 million or $3.50 per diluted share increased $55.4 million or $1.01 per share from 2020 levels, representing a 40.6% increase in diluted earnings per share. Excluding these items, diluted earnings per share of $3.50 in 2021 increased 34.6% from 2020 and 16.3% from 2019 levels. And the EPS, $3.50, a substantial rise versus both 2020 and 2019. We anticipate that capital expenditures will be in the range of $90 million to $100 million.

Summary:
1. Snap-on disclosed a significant increase in earnings per share of $3.50, up 40.6% from the previous year, indicating that the company has emerged stronger from the pandemic.
2. The company expects capital expenditures between the range of $90 million and $100 million.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document? (Yes/No)
Start your answer explicitly with "Yes" or "No", and if you answer no, explain which sentence is inconsistent and why.
 Give two different versions of responses. Please separate the responses with 6 asterisk symbols: ******.
user