Given the document below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document:
We are also raising our adjusted earnings per share range for the full year by $0.30 per share and now expect adjusted earnings per share of $3.67 per share, at the midpoint of the range provided. We are raising our full-year guidance range for net sales, operating EBITDA and adjusted EPS. Shelter solutions had low single-digit organic growth versus the year ago period, reflecting high single-digit organic growth in residential construction and retail channels for do-it-yourself application, offset partially by softness in commercial construction market. We expect to improve leverage and now expect operating EBITDA for the year to be about 4.03 billion, at the midpoint of the range provided, a year-over-year increase of 17%. This supply situation is gradually improving while we anticipate several critical products will continue to constrain our production through the end of the second quarter.

Summary:
1. The company has elevated its earnings per share and full-year guidance range for net sales and operating EBITDA.
2. There has been low single-digit growth on the shelter solutions side but the company expects to improve leverage with a year-over-year increase of 17% in operating EBITDA.
3. The supply situation is improving, but some products will still hamper production until the end of Q2.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document? (Yes/No)
Start your answer explici There should be exactly 6 paragraphs separated by the markdown divider: ***.
user