Given the document below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document:
Spain's 2-0 defeat by NAME_1 on Tuesday brought back bitter memories of their disastrous 2014 World Cup, but coach NAME_2 will not be too worried about a third straight friendly defeat, insists NAME_3. NAME_1, whose 5-1 drubbing of Spain in the group stage in Brazil last year marked the end of the Iberian nation's six-year domination of the world game, scored two early goals at the Amsterdam Arena and held on against some determined Spain pressure in the second half for a 2-0 success. They became the first team to inflict two defeats on Del NAME_4 since he took over in 2008 but the gruff 64-year-old had used the match to try out several new faces and he fielded a largely experimental, second-string team. NAME_5 (right) headed NAME_1 in front against Spain at the Amsterdam Arena on Tuesday NAME_3 (left) could do nothing to

Summary:
1. spain lost 2-0 to NAME_1 in a friendly at the amsterdam arena on tuesday .
2. NAME_5 and NAME_6 scored the goals for the dutch .
3. NAME_2 fielded a largely experimental , second-string team .
4. spain are second in qualifying for euro 2016 in france .

Is the summary factually consistent with the document? (Yes/No)
Start your answer explicitly with "Yes" or "No", and if you answer no, explain which sentence is inconsistent and why.
 Please use JSON format in your answer.
user