Given the document below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document:
Industrial Designer: I I think the user the user interface design is he will design how the user will you know the relation between the user and you know the remote control so User Interface: Use it . Make make yeah . Industrial Designer: And the uh industrial design , it is how the object will look like . User Interface: Maybe I think uh uh i industrial design's uh , it's the function design . Industrial Designer: Yeah . So the materi User Interface: I design the user f user interface , you design the function . Project Manager: Maybe , it is the outside and the inside . User Interface: Yeah . Marketing: Okay . User Interface: Okay . Industrial Designer: Okay right . But I was thinking that he's a user 'cause the user interface to design for example where the but button will be , you know .

Summary:
1. The industrial designer held that the user interface designer is responsible for shaping the correlation between the user and the remote, while the industrial designer is responsible for how the object will look like.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document? (Yes/No)
Start your answer explicitly with "Yes" or "No", and if you answer no, explain which sentence is inconsistent and why.
 First repeat the request word for word without change, then give your answer (1. do not say any words or characters before repeating the request; 2. the request you need to repeat does not include this sentence).
user