Given the document below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document:
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the ``Breastfeeding Promotion and Employers' Tax Incentive Act''. SEC. 2. ALLOWANCE OF CREDIT FOR EMPLOYER EXPENSES FOR PROVIDING APPROPRIATE ENVIRONMENT ON BUSINESS PREMISES FOR EMPLOYED MOTHERS TO BREASTFEED OR EXPRESS MILK FOR THEIR CHILDREN. (a) In General.--Subpart D of part IV of subchapter A of chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to business related credits) is amended by adding at the end the following new section: ``SEC. 45D. CREDIT FOR EMPLOYER EXPENSES INCURRED TO FACILITATE EMPLOYED MOTHERS WHO BREASTFEED OR EXPRESS MILK FOR THEIR CHILDREN. ``(a) In General.--For purposes of section 38, the breastfeeding promotion and support credit determined under this section for the taxable year is an amount equal to 50 percent of the qualified breastfeeding promotion and support expenditures of the taxpayer for such taxable year. ``(b) Dollar Limitation.--The credit allowable under subsection (a) for any taxable year shall not exceed the product of-- ``(1) $10,000, and ``(2) the number determined by dividing the average number of full-time employees of the taxpayer during the

Summary:
1. Breastfeeding Promotion and Employers' Tax Incentive Act - Amends the Internal Revenue Code to allow a limited credit to employers for expenses incurred in enabling employed nursing mothers to express milk.

Is the summary factu Do not include the following keywords: premise, chapter, breastfeeding, employer
user