Given the document below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document:
It was another momentous night in NAME_1's proud European history, NAME_2 rampaging through Paris Saint-Germain's defence to put one foot in the Champions League semi-finals. And NAME_1's second of the night, in the 67th minute when NAME_3 stormed through, nutmegged NAME_4 and finished, was their 400th goal in the competition. The landmark has been achieved in 202 matches since 1992 when the European Champions Clubs' Cup became the modern Champions League we know and love. The two goals scored by NAME_5 against PSG took NAME_1 past 400 Champions League goals. NAME_1 have reached the landmark in 202 Champions League matches since 1992. NAME_1 won the quarter-final, first-leg match 3-1 to put themselves in control of the tie. NAME_1 still have a little way to go before they catch Real Madrid's 436 Champions League goals. Table courtesy of Opta. However, NAME_1 still have a some way

Summary:
1. NAME_1 reached landmark in 202 Champions League matches since 1992.
2. NAME_5's two goals against PSG took them past 400 in the competition.
3. NAME_6 is joint - top scorer in the Champions League with 75.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document? (Yes/No)
Start your answer explicitly with "Yes" or "No", and if you answer no, explain which sentence is inconsistent and why.
 Do not include the following keywords: second, competition, goal, madrid
user