Given the document below, determine if the summary is factually consistent with the document. A summary is factually consistent if all the dates and times in the summary are presented the same way as in the document.

Document: NAME_1, a Scottish parliament member, made the remarks when asked to support a justice campaign for three soldiers killed by the IRA in 1971. NAME_2 and brothers NAME_3 and NAME_4 were off-duty when they were lured from a Belfast bar. NAME_5 apologised after the family of one of the soldiers took offence. A cousin of NAME_6 said the SNP man's original tweet was an "insult" to his family. Earlier, NAME_7 told the BBC's Good Morning Ulster programme that his family had asked Scottish First Minister and SNP leader NAME_8 for a public apology and to take disciplinary action against NAME_5. The Glasgow Shettleston MSP said his comments "were general" and not specifically about the gunmen who killed the three soldiers. However, on Tuesday afternoon, NAME_5 issued a statement to the Belfast News Letter through the SNP press office. It said: "I

Summary: 1. NAME_1, a member of the Parliament, made the remarks when asked to support campaign for justice for three soldiers killed by the IRA in 2009.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document with respect to dates and times?
Options: "Yes" or "No"

Answer:


 Give two different versions of responses. Please separate the responses with 6 asterisk symbols: ******.
user