Given the document below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document:
The EU Commission has now banned employees from using TikTok TikTok's been facing similar treatments in the United States as well. In the U.S. the app got banned in December for all federal government devices - due to concerns that the app may be spying. TikTok's parent company, ByteDance, is based in China. Also, TikTok's CEO NAME_1 is expected to testify before the U.S. Congress on March 23 - the topic of discussion: potential risks that TikTok could be to U.S. national security. TikTok is in trouble. Or so it seems (the understatement of the year!). Across the U.S. and the European Union, the crazy-popular short video-sharing platform is facing scrutiny and mistrust. And now, Politico reports that European Commission staff is banned from using TikTok over security concerns.Allegedly, there are ties between Chinese tech companies and the Chinese Communist Party, and the West is getting alarmed. Also, people are getting more and more concerned with the possibility that TikTok collects info from all over the world.An unnamed official told the folks at Politico that EU staff was

Summary:
1. Employees of the European Commission are now obligated to delete TikTok from their work devices, and erase it from their personal devices too if they have work-related apps installed.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document? (Yes/No)
Start your answer explicitly with "Yes" o Write exactly 4 paragraphs each separated with two new lines answering this question. The 2nd paragraph must start with "take".
user