Given the document below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document:
Editor's Note: Sign up for Unlocking the World, CNN Travel's weekly newsletter. Get news about destinations opening, inspiration for future adventures, plus the latest in aviation, food and drink, where to stay and other travel developments. CNN -- For years, journey times flying east from Israel depended on who you were flying with. If you were boarding a flight operated by Israeli airlines, including national carrier NAME_1 NAME_2, your flight would take around two hours more than if you were flying with another airline. The reason? Israeli airlines were banned from the airspace of both NAME_3 and Saudi Arabia. That meant flights to India and Southeast Asia, which would naturally head east from Israel, had to dip south, crossing over Jordan and following the Red Sea down to the bottom of the Arabian Peninsula, before hooking northeast. Now, all that is set to change. Following the Saudi government's announcement in July 2022 that the country's airspace would open up to all carriers, NAME_3 has followed suit. NAME_1 NAME_2 has posted a map of their current and new routes to Southeast

Summary:
1. NAME_3 is now offering a new scenic route to Israeli carriers, including NAME_1 NAME_2.
2. Previously, the airlines had to fly a roundabout route to parts of Asia, adding hours to journey times.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document? (Yes/No)
Start your answer explicitly with "Yes" or "No", and if you Please reply with exactly 5 paragraphs and separate each paragraph with two new lines. The very last paragraph must start with the word "services".
user