Given the document below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document:
NAME_1: His majesty Tendering my person's safety, NAME_2 appointed This conduct to convey me to the Tower. NAME_3: Upon what cause? NAME_1: Because my name is NAME_4. NAME_3: Alack, my lord, that fault is none of yours; He should, for that, commit your godfathers: O, belike his majesty NAME_2 some intent That you shall be new-christen'd in the Tower. But what's the matter, NAME_1? may I know? NAME_1: Yea, NAME_5, when I know; for I protest As yet I do not: but, as I can learn, He hearkens after prophecies and dreams; And from the cross-row plucks the letter G. And says a wizard told him that by G His issue disinherited should be; And, for my name of NAME_4 begins with G, It follows in his thought that I am he. These, as I learn, and such like toys as these Have moved his highness to commit me now. NAME_3: Why, this it is, when men are ruled by women: 'Tis not the NAME_6 that sends you to the Tower: My NAME_7 his wife, NAME_1, 'tis she That

Summary:
1. The character NAME_1 is being sent to the Tower by the NAME_6 due to a prophecy involving the letter "G" that menaces the NAME_6's lineage.
2. NAME_3, NAME_1's brother, suspects that NAME_6's wife, NAME_7, and her family are manipulating the NAME_6's actions and promises NAME_1 that he will do whatever it takes to rescue him from imprisonment.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document? (Yes/No)
S Provide response in all capital letters, no lowercase letters allowed.
user