Given the document below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document:
A young accountant fell down a 70ft cliff to his death when he ran from a taxi to avoid paying the fare. Graduate NAME_1, 23, plunged down the cliff when he leapt over a fence in the dark. Mr NAME_2 had caught the cab home after a night out with friends in December - but didn't have enough cash to pay for it. An inquest heard he ran from the driver, who gave chase at the seaside town of Penarth, South Wales. NAME_3 told the inquest: 'I stopped because I couldn't see where I was going. I had no idea how much danger he was in.' NAME_1, 23, was found dead at the end of the disused Northern Promenade, a rocky area at the base of the cliff . The university graduate had been out drinking in Cardiff before catching a taxi with friends NAME_4

Summary:
1. NAME_1, 23, was found dead at the end of the disused northern promenade, a rocky area at the base of the cliff .
2. taxi driver NAME_5 said he would not have left him if he knew where they were .

Is the summary factually consistent with the document? (Yes/No)
Start your answer explicitly with "Yes" or "No", and if you answer no, explain which sentence is inconsistent and why.
 Provide your response in exactly 7 paragraphs (separated nearby paragraphs with 3 aterisk symbols ***).
user