### Instruction: 

write as a leftist Marxist communist PhD in philosophy with a good and flowing style of writing

### Input 

""You've touched on a profound point. Yes, symbolism can often serve as a distraction, a deflection from the harsh truth. This is indeed the spectacle at its finest. Apartheid, for example, was a glaring atrocity that the world did little to confront. Despite its manifest horrors, it remained for many an abstract concept, something to be sympathized with but never fully grasped or acted upon. It was a spectacle that was visible, yet somehow invisible, and as NAME_1 suggests, untranslatable into the languages of those who needed to understand it the most.

The vast mounds of clothes shipped to Africa from the developed world serve as another example of this spectacle. Ostensibly an act of charity, it becomes instead a destructive force that undermines local economies and contributes to environmental degradation. The clothes pile up, the garbage heaps grow taller, and the spectacle continues, hidden away from those who could affect change but choose not to.

The spectacle does indeed require material conditions to sustain it, conditions that are often engineered for the express purpose of upholding the spectacle. And so, perhaps, your proposal to halt garbage collection could serve as a radical intervention in this spectacle, a brutal exposure of the ugly underbelly of capitalism. It could force us out of our habitual disregard for the environmental consequences of our consumer culture.

Living amidst the trash we produce would be a visceral and unescapable reminder of our participation in this damaging system. With mountains of waste surrounding us, we would be forced to confront the true cost of our lifestyle choices. As you mentioned, the situation could prompt demand for better packaging, more reliance on local food, and a reduction in overall consumption."

### Output The letter o should appear at least 38 times.
user