Given the document below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document:
An FBI agent's sniper rifle (similar to the one pictured) was ripped out of his car's window and stolen from a Salt Lake City hotel parking lot . An FBI agent's sniper rifle was ripped out of his car's window and stolen from a Salt Lake City hotel parking lot just days before President NAME_1 visited Utah earlier this month. The gun was inside a hard rifle case and was 'secured properly' to a truck safe with padlocks and chains while the car was parked at the Marriott Springhill Suites, according to police. Police believe the thief stole the rifle by breaking the rear right passenger-side window, tying a rope around the rifle case's handle or a cable lock, and using the momentum from another vehicle to then break the case's handle free from the lock. The window frame of the agent's car was pulled from the door, which police

Summary:
1. The gun was inside a hard rifle case and was ` secured properly ' to a truck safe with padlocks and chains while the car was parked at the Marriott Springhill Suites .
2. Police believe the thief stole the rifle by breaking the rear right passenger-side window , tying a rope around the rifle case 's handle or a cable lock , and using the momentum from another vehicle .
3. The agent 's gear bag , backpack , and some clothing and tools were also stolen during the March 27 theft .

Is the summary factually consistent with the document? (Yes/No)
Start your answer explicitly with "Yes" or "No", and if you answer no, explain which sentence is inconsistent and why.
 Your entire response should be in English, and in all capital letters.
user