Given the document below, determine if the summary is factually consistent with the document.
A summary is factually consistent if all statements in the summary are entailed by the document.

Document: World number nine NAME_1, 22, carded six birdies in the ANA Inspiration at Mission Hills, California to lead Norway's NAME_2 NAME_3 (68). England's NAME_4, 21, had three birdies in a one-under 71 as she slipped eight shots off the lead. She is tied for 11th on five under par with world number one NAME_5. The 19-year-old from New Zealand, who won this tournament last year to collect her second major title, bogeyed the first hole but posted two birdies and 15 pars for a one-under 71. Seven-time major winner NAME_6 NAME_7 is in a group of four on 10 under that includes fellow South Korean NAME_8 Ryu, the 2011 US Women's Open champion. The event is back on schedule after delays caused by stormy weather but NAME_1 was among 56 players who had to complete their second rounds on Saturday before playing the third. The halfway leader,

Summary: 1. Englishwoman NAME_9, the only other NAME_6 NAME_7 woman to make the cut, is two above average after scoring two-over-74 hit in a mixed round of five birdies, five bogeys and a double .

Is the summary factually consistent with the document?
Start your answer with "Yes" or "No".

Answer:


 Do not include the following keywords: ana, winner, name_7, par
user