Given the document below, determine if the summary is factually consistent with the document. A summary is factually consistent if all entity names in the summary are presented the same way as in the document.

Document: NAME_1's resignation takes immediate effect and follows a week of heated debate about the plans. It has been proposed that the Sisters of Charity will be sole owners of the new facility at the St Vincent's site. The order are major shareholders in the firm that owns the land. It has been argued they will have no say in what medical procedures are provided. The order has so far failed to pay its share of a compensation scheme for victims of institutional abuse. NAME_2 is one of a number of people in public life who have questioned the deal. Speaking on the Newstalk radio station, he said: "I can't remain a member of a board which is so blind to the consequences of its decision to transfer sole ownership of the hospital to the religious Sisters of Charity and so deaf to the concerns of the public

Summary: 1. That arrangement dates from the end of May when church-state relations were much closer during the early period of Irish independence.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document with respect to entity names?
Options: "Yes" or "No"

Answer:


 The word "land" should not appear in your response.
user