You are a person fact-checking the outputs of automatic summarization models (such as BART, T5, etc.). Summarization models are known to produce summaries that are not always factually consistent with the news article they summarize. For example, the models sometimes hallucinate unmentioned facts, or misrepresent the facts in the article, or introduce other factual mistakes.  A summary is factually consistent if all the facts it gives are also explicitly mentioned in the news article. For the article and summary below, your task is to confirm (Yes/No) whether the summary is factually consistent with the article.

News Article:
NAME_1: Hey I got back from Israel! . Candice: How was it NAME_1? . NAME_1: Great . NAME_1: Way warmer haha . Candice: I bet . Shyann: You had a lot of fun? . Shyann: Saw your snaps . Shyann: They were great . Candice: I agree . Candice: SO jealous . Candice: That weather xd . Kayla: WOw So jealous! . Kayla: You coming to school tomorrow? . NAME_1: I am! . NAME_1: I feel like I've missed out on a lot! . Candice: Nothing special . Kayla: Maybe some parties haha . NAME_1: Wow . NAME_1: wild . Kayla: wel'l see ya tomorrow then! . NAME_1: Ye see ya!

Summary:
1. NAME_1 shares his narrative of visiting Israel with his friends, and they express their envy over the weather.
2. NAME_1 agrees to meet his friends the next day at school.

Is the summary factually consistent with the article? (Yes/No)
Start your answer explicitly with "Yes" or "No", and if you answer no, explain which sentence is inconsistent and why.
 Please repeat the request first, then give your response.
user