Given the document below, determine if the summary is factually consistent with the document. A summary is factually consistent if no facts in the summary reflect the negation of a fact in the document.

Document: The Mighty Boosh star told the Sunday Times he "can't put on weight" because he gets more work when he is thinner. Meanwhile, healthy food campaigner NAME_1, who takes over from NAME_2 on the show, insists "baking is the best way to get people into cooking". The latest series returns this autumn on Channel 4 after it outbid the BBC. NAME_3, who joins NAME_4 in the show's new line-up, told The Sunday Times Magazine: "Sugar is a powerful thing". The comedian explained that he recently lost a stone to play the singer NAME_5: "I get more work when I'm thinner, so I can't put on weight. "I don't eat anything, I'm like a plant." He added: "It's not that I don't like cake, I have a very sweet tooth." The BBC lost the contract to broadcast Bake Off last year after Love Productions, the makers of the

Summary: 1. Similarly, NAME_6 also announced that he would not be be staying on the show on Channel 4, citing "loyalty" to the BBC.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document with respect to facts?
Options: "Yes" or "No"

Answer:


 The response should be in all capital letters.
user