Given the document below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document:
NAME_1's NAME_2 had to settle for 14th place in an incident-packed Tour of Flanders as Norwegian NAME_3 took victory in a sprint finish with Holland's NAME_4. With NAME_5 NAME_6 and Fabian Cancellara - winners of six of the last 10 races here - missing through injury, NAME_7 was one of the favourites to claim the title following his recent victory in E3 Harelbeke and third-place finish at the Gent-Wevelgem sprint classic. He was in contention for much of Sunday's race as NAME_1 set the pace in the peloton for lengthy periods, but the Welshman was unable to recover ground as NAME_8 (Team NAME_9) and NAME_10 (Etixx - Quick-Step) launched a late breakaway. NAME_3 celebrates by spraying champagne after winning the Tour of Flanders . Norway's NAME_8 poses after beating off competition from NAME_4 to win the Tour of Flanders race . The highly-fancied

Summary:
1. NAME_3 beat off competition from NAME_4 to win the Tour of Flanders.
2. NAME_1's NAME_2 finished in 14th position after struggling to close the gap on the likes of NAME_8.
3. NAME_11 was one of a number of riders to hit the deck during the race when he crashed.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document? (Yes/No)
Start your answer explicitly with "Yes" or "No", and if you answer no, explain which sentence is inconsistent and why.
 Wrap the entire output in JSON format.
user