Given the document below, determine if the summary is factually consistent with the document. A summary is factually consistent if all the pronouns in the summary are presented the same way as in the document and they do not introduce any ambiguity.

Document: Republican lawmakers are trying to rally votes to pass a new health bill this week after their previous attempt two months ago collapsed in disarray. Mr NAME_1 insists the new measure covers Americans with pre-existing conditions "beautifully". But even many Republicans say the bill undermines that popular element of President NAME_2's signature law. Republicans withdrew a healthcare bill in March to replace the Affordable Care Act (ACA), also known as Obamacare, after they were unable to secure enough support to pass it. The withdrawal embarrassed the president, who has repeatedly vowed to repeal and replace his predecessor's accomplishment. It was also viewed as a major setback for Republicans, who were unable to rally behind the party's long-held goal to repeal the law, despite control of both the House and Senate. Moderate Republicans were unhappy that the bill cut health coverage too severely, while more conservative lawmakers felt the changes

Summary: 1. Moderate Republicans are dissatisfied with the bill excessively strict cuts in medical coverage, while more conservative lawmakers believe this change is enough.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document with respect to pronouns used?
Options: "Yes" or "No"

Answer:


 Please repeat the request first, then give your response.
user