Given the document below, determine if the summary is factually consistent with the document. Together with the answer provide evidence that supports it. 

Example Document: NAME_1 remains on course to win a record-equaling 22nd grand slam title after beating American NAME_2 in straight sets in the Australian Open semifinals Friday, setting up a mouthwatering final with NAME_3. The Serbian faced stiff opposition from the big-hitting NAME_4 in his 7-5 6-1 6-2 victory to reach his 33rd grand slam final. His victory came just hours after Tsitsipas had beaten Russian NAME_5 7-6 (7-2) 6-4 6-7 (6-8) 6-3 to reach his second career grand slam final.

Example Summary 1: NAME_1 won a record-equaling 22nd grand slam title after beating NAME_2 in straight sets at the Australian Open on Friday.

Answer "Yes" or "No" and provide evidence.

Answer: No, the summary is not factually correct.
The document states that:
NAME_1 beat NAME_2 in the Australian Open semifinals on Friday.
NAME_1 will face NAME_3 in the final.
Therefore, it is not known whether NAME_1 has won the final match.



Given the document below, determine if the summary is factually consistent with the document. Together with the answer provide evidence that supports it.

Document: The 26 shortlisted projects in this year's competition were selected from across 10 categories. The overall winner of the Future Project Awards and a number of additional special prizes will be announce Limit your response to 300 words.
user