Given the document below, determine if the summary is factually consistent with the document. A summary is factually consistent if all the pronouns in the summary are presented the same way as in the document and they do not introduce any ambiguity.

Document: Full-back NAME_1 slotted three penalties and a conversion to add to NAME_2 NAME_3's try to earn NAME_4 NAME_5's side four crucial points. Bristol battled hard, with three penalties from young stand-off NAME_6 earning them a bonus point. NAME_7's joy was tempered by the loss of fly-half NAME_8 NAME_9, who limped off in the opening period. Fellow co-captain NAME_10 was also left limping, in the second half, although there was some relief for both NAME_7 boss NAME_5 and Wales as Taulupe Faletau came through 55 minutes unscathed after injury. Bristol have now lost all eight games since their return to the Premiership and are seven points adrift of NAME_11 at the bottom. It was an arm-wrestle of a local rivalry, with just one Homer penalty adding to the half-time score in front of a record crowd at the Rec. NAME_3's score, the only five-pointer of a hard-fought game,

Summary: 1. NAME_7 coach Tabai NAME_12 told the Radio Bristol: "It was a precious victory for them, but our performance was terrible."

Is the summary factually consistent with the document with respect to pronouns used?
Options: "Yes" or "No"

Answer:


 The words with all capital letters should appear at least 5 times.
user