Given the document below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document:
PhD D: NAME_1 . Uh , NAME_1 . So there is this . And maybe we well we find some people so that uh , agree to maybe work with us , and they have implementation of VTS techniques so it 's um , Vector Taylor Series that are used to mmm , uh f to model the transformation between clean cepstra and noisy cepstra . So . Well , if you take the standard model of channel plus noise , uh , it 's it 's a nonlinear eh uh , transformation in the cepstral domain . NAME_2: Mm - hmm . Yes . PhD D: And uh , there is a way to approximate this using uh , first - order or second - order Taylor Series and it can be used for uh , getting rid of the noise and the channel effect . NAME_2: Who is doing this ? PhD D: Uh w working in the cepstral domain ? So there is one guy in Grenada , PhD B: NAME_1 , in Grenada one

Summary:
1. The team mentioned that one of their associates, NAME_3, is working in Grenada on implementing VTS techniques for modeling the transformation between clean and noisy cepstra.
2. NAME_2 expressed that he did not know him.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document? (Yes/No)
Start your answer explicitly with "Yes" or "No", and if you answer no, explain which sentence is inconsistent and why.
 The response should be in all capital letters.
user