Given the document below, determine if the summary is factually consistent with the document. A summary is factually consistent if all the numbers in the summary are presented the same way as in the document.

Document: NAME_1 NAME_2's men made a great start with full-back Tiernan O'Halloran getting the opening try in the 13th minute. NAME_3 scored a superb touchdown midway through the half to give Connacht a 15-0 interval lead. NAME_4 scored Connacht's third try on 57 minutes with NAME_5 giving Leinster some hope 10 minutes later. With Connacht having picked up some injuries, it looked like they might come under serious pressure. But the men from Galway, with skipper NAME_6 making his 275th appearance, had done more than enough to secure the long-awaited and much sought-after silverware. Connacht had never been in the Pro12 final before and they made the most of their historic opportunity, playing adventurous, running rugby to telling effect. For NAME_7's Leinster, a record fifth win in the competition must wait for another day. They could only muster a NAME_8 penalty and the late

Summary: 1. MacGinty pulled her attempt at the extras wide but made amends with a penalty soon after.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document with respect to numbers?
Options: "Yes" or "No"

Answer:


 The word "hope" should not appear in your response.
user