Write a paper review based on the following points:
* I cannot comment on journal specific guidelines
  * No IMRaD
* Motivation is scattered
  * Some on top of page 20
  * As if to hide reasoning
* Two referencing styles used
  * only one in bib
* Region spoken about could be more specific
  * Refresher maps/align region numbers with section numbers
* Never references google maps
* **General question:** Why don’t we ref the writing software? E.g. Word
* Strange phrasing throughout
  * Some are poor english
  * Some are not scientific 
    * *probably 12*
    * *full maritime authority* pg 20
    * *harsh sanctions* 24 
    * *almost* 28
  * Some are militarily aggresive/political
    * *needs a power navy*
    * *take on a special approach*
    * *must possess warships that travel to the further points on Earth every now and then*
    * *exploit this capability to further its maritime dominance*
    * Iranian commanders/leader has claimed/said x, pg 10
    * *Iran will be able to threaten* pg 24
    * *making important waterways unsafe* 24
    * 
* A few sentences/paragraphs are randomly placed
  * pg 2
* A few “Reference source not found”
* Lots of statements missing references
  * pg 9
* Abbreviation not spelt out “SWATH” pg 4
* Section two has no introduction
* pg 5 - half a page for what should be obvious 
  * A few other scenarios with redundant information pg 6, 7
* There are two figure 2’s
* Cites Wikipedia twice
* Elude to potential sanction dodging, not good either way pg.7
* Contradictory, pg7 refers to gaining access to far water, this thesis is for regional access
  * similar on pg 9, refers to whole globe
  * pg 11 “target large portions of Asia, Africa, and internaional waterways”
* Pretty easy to read
  * Partly because it’s not that academic
* Ill thought out statements, UAV advantage three pg 8
* Strange heading numbering
* Initally keep scope to $10\degree$, occasionally exceed this
  * pg11 aim for nearest US nuclear war heads
  * pg 23 talk about suez canal, out of Iran
  * pg 25 mention three straits, only one in Iranian waters
* Poor formatting pg 11
* Missing stats pg12
* NAME_1 titles not under figs/strange format, pg 12
  * section 4.2.
* Low quality images
  * NAME_1 6,8,11
* Content of little relevance
  * **Mentioned this before**
  * pg 13
* NAME_1 titles not on same page as NAME_1, NAME_1 7
* Occasional good, clear sentences pg 14
* Sometimes explains things too much (missile distance near beginning),sometimes not enough:
  * intercept enemey communication pg 14
  * pg 18 Engineering analysis
  * ove Please reply with exactly 6 paragraphs and separate each paragraph with two new lines. The very 4th paragraph must start with the word "sources".
user