Given the document below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document:
A gang of at least three people poured gasoline on a car that stopped to fill up at California gas station early on Saturday morning and set the vehicle on fire. The driver of the car, who has not been identified, said he got into an argument with the suspects while he was pumping gas at a 76 Station in South Los Angeles around 12:15am on Saturday. The group covered his white Dodge Charger in gasoline and lit it ablaze while there were two passengers inside. Scroll down for video . Firefight: At least three people poured gasoline on a car and lit it on fire at a South Los Angeles gas station . Explosive situation: Group covered the white Dodge Charger and lit it while there were two passengers inside . Burnt out: The passengers and the driver were not hurt during the incident but the car was completely

Summary:
1. the driver of the car said he got into an argument with the suspects .
2. the group covered his white dodge charger in gasoline and lit it ablaze .
3. the fire was lit after the suspects attempted to carjack the man .
4. the los angeles county fire department is investigating the incident as an arson .

Is the summary factually consistent with the document? (Yes/No)
Start your answer explicitly with "Yes" or "No", and if you answer no, explain which sentence is inconsistent and why.
 Make sure to only use capital letters in your entire response.
user