Given the document below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document:
Professor NAME_1: So as I understand , you know , he 's using all the machines and you 're using all the machines , PhD F: So . Professor NAME_1: is the rough division of PhD F: Yeah . Exactly . Yeah , you know , I I sort of got started using the recognizer just recently and uh , uh I fired off a training job , and then I fired off a recognition job and I get this email about midnight from NAME_2 saying , " uh , are you running two trainings simultaneously s my m my jobs are not getting run . " So I had to back off a little bit . But , soon as we get some more machines then uh then we 'll have more compute available . So , um , that 's just a quick update about what we 've got . So . Grad G: Um , I have I have a question about the uh , parallelization ? PhD F: Mm - hmm . Grad G: So ,

Summary:
1. During the conversation, Professor NAME_1 mentioned that during a previous workshop, there were 25 machines and a P-make-like system was not used where all 25 people sent things to all 25 machines.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document? (Yes/No)
Start your answer explicitly with "Yes" or "No", and if you answer no, explain which sentence is inconsistent and why.
 Write exactly 10 paragraphs each separated with two new lines answering this question. The last paragraph must start with "difficult".
user