Given the document below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document:
NAME_1 was an outspoken opponent of feminism and abortion and helped Republicans block the Equal Rights Amendment in the 1970s. She campaigned against Communism and is credited with creating the political climate that helped NAME_2 become president. NAME_1 publicly endorsed NAME_3 at a rally in March. Paying tribute to her on Monday, the Republican presidential candidate described NAME_1 as "a patriot, a champion for women and a symbol of strength". NAME_1's death, in St Louis, was announced by the Eagle Forum, a conservative group she founded in 1972. It described her as an "iconic American leader whose love for America was surpassed only by her love of God and her family". NAME_1 was a strong advocate of traditional family values and one of her crowning political victories was helping to stop the Equal Rights Amendment [ERA] from being added to the US Constitution.

Summary:
1. Us conservative activist NAME_4 has died at the age of 87.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document? (Yes/No)
Start your answer explicitly with "Yes" or "No", and if you answer no, explain which sentence is inconsistent and why.
 Provide your reponse without using the word activist.
user