Given the document below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document:
Twice French Open champion NAME_1 said her struggle to beat NAME_2 Errani in the Fed Cup on Sunday had been a real 'eye-opener' as the claycourt season gets into full swing. World No 1 NAME_3 eventually prevailed 4-6 7-6(3) 6-3 against the dogged Italian to take her career record over her to 8-0 but the American was not impressed. The US were beaten 3-2 as NAME_3 and NAME_4 were thrashed 6-0 6-3 in the doubles rubber by Errani and NAME_5, meaning they were relegated to World Group II. American tennis star NAME_1 fought back to beat Italian NAME_2 Errani in the Fed Cup play-off on Sunday . Tough weather conditions made it difficult for both players who had to keep on re-tossing their serves . Errani gave NAME_3 a real scare but in the end the world No 1's power proved to be too much .

Summary:
1. NAME_1 beat NAME_2 errani 4-6 7-6(3) 6-3 in fed cup play-off .
2. us beat italy 3-2 but NAME_3 and NAME_4 lost doubles rubber .
3. world no 1 admits she is not ready for claycourt season yet .

Is the summary factually consistent with the document? (Yes/No)
Start your answer explicitly with "Yes" or "No", and if you answer no, explain which sentence is inconsistent and why.
 Add stress words that are fully capitlized. Make sure these stress words appear more than 3 times.
user