Given the document below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document:
City, who had lost 10 of their previous 13 games, led 2-0 at St James' Park, before the hosts fought back to level. The Robins are two only points above the relegation zone, though they have a game in hand on 22nd-placed Wigan. "We were outstanding as a club today. The staff, the players, the fans all came together," said NAME_1. "I was just proud of the club today. There has been a lot of stick flying about this week and rightly so, and of course I bear the brunt of it. "The players have produced and if anyone was ever in doubt that this was a committed bunch of players then today they will have seen that." Newcastle's comeback was the second time in the past four games that Bristol City have dropped points from a healthy winning position, having drawn 3-3 with NAME_2 on 11 February after taking

Summary:
1. Bristol City manager NAME_3 said he was "proud" of his side after they came from two goals down to beat Newcastle United 3-2 and end a run of five straight defeats.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document? (Yes/No)
Start your answer explicitly with "Yes" or "No", and if you answer no, explain which sentence is inconsistent and why.
 The words with all capital letters should appear at least 10 times.
user