Given the document below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document:
Manchester United and Liverpool target PS25million NAME_1 has held talks with Paris St Germain this week with the permission of his club PSV Eindhoven. The dialogue between PSG and NAME_2 represents a threat to the Premier League clubs with the Qatari-backed French club understood to have made a significantly better financial offer than Liverpool. United have yet to hold detailed talks with the player but have informed PSV of their wish to do so while Liverpool have established a good relationship with the club and would be serious contenders to sign the wide player if United's offer does not match their own. NAME_1 (centre) has held talks with PSG, despite Liverpool and Manchester United's interest. Holland player NAME_2 (right) has caught the eye of clubs over Europe with good form for club and country. NAME_3 gave NAME_2 his international debut but could miss out on bringing

Summary:
1. NAME_1 has held talks with Paris St Germain this week.
2. Manchester United and Liverpool are both interested in the Holland winger.
3. PSG are understood to have made a significantly better offer than Liverpool.
4. NAME_2 is intrigued by the prospect of playing with NAME_4.
5. Click here for more transfer news.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document? (Yes/No)
Start your answer explicitly with "Yes" or "No", and if you answer no, explain which sentence is inconsistent and why.
 Write exactly 10 paragraphs each separated with two new lines answering this question. The 3rd paragraph must start with "mind".
user