Given the document below, determine if the summary is factually consistent with the document. A summary is factually consistent if all the pronouns in the summary are presented the same way as in the document and they do not introduce any ambiguity.

Document: NAME_1 NAME_2's men made a great start with full-back Tiernan O'Halloran getting the opening try in the 13th minute. NAME_3 scored a superb touchdown midway through the half to give NAME_4 a 15-0 interval lead. NAME_5 scored NAME_4's third try on 57 minutes with NAME_6 giving Leinster some hope 10 minutes later. With NAME_4 having picked up some injuries, it looked like they might come under serious pressure. But the men from Galway, with skipper NAME_7 making his 275th appearance, had done more than enough to secure the long-awaited and much sought-after silverware. NAME_4 had never been in the Pro12 final before and they made the most of their historic opportunity, playing adventurous, running rugby to telling effect. For NAME_8's Leinster, a record fifth win in the competition must wait for another day. They could only muster a NAME_9 penalty and the late

Summary: 1. MacGinty pulled her attempt at the extras wide but made amends with a penalty soon after.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document with respect to pronouns used?
Options: "Yes" or "No"

Answer:


 Do not say any word before repeating the exact request.
user