Given the document below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document:
We are also raising our adjusted earnings per share range for the full year by $0.30 per share and now expect adjusted earnings per share of $3.67 per share, at the midpoint of the range provided. We are raising our full-year guidance range for net sales, operating EBITDA and adjusted EPS. Shelter solutions had low single-digit organic growth versus the year ago period, reflecting high single-digit organic growth in residential construction and retail channels for do-it-yourself application, offset partially by softness in commercial construction market. We expect to improve leverage and now expect operating EBITDA for the year to be about 4.03 billion, at the midpoint of the range provided, a year-over-year increase of 17%. This supply situation is gradually improving while we anticipate several critical products will continue to constrain our production through the end of the second quarter.

Summary:
1. The company has raised its earnings per share but lowered the full-year guidance range for net sales and operating EBITDA.
2. There has not been any growth on the shelter solutions side, and the company expects to improve leverage with a year-over-year increase of 17% in operating EBITDA.
3. The supply situation is improving, but some products will still restrict production until the end of Q2.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document? (Yes/No)
Start your answer exp Give two different versions of responses. Please separate the responses with 6 asterisk symbols: ******.
user