Given the document below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document:
These are the last known movements of a murdered university student whose body was found in the boot of a burning car. Firefighters made the grim discovery of NAME_1's body in Ifield, near Crawley, West Sussex on March 13. . Police have now released video stills and footage of the 21-year-old University of Brighton student in Portslade on the night before her death. . Scroll down for video . NAME_1 was seen walking in a subway in Portslade, NAME_2, at 10.30pm on March 12. The images were released shortly after the youngster's family spoke about her 'bubbly' personality in a heartfelt tribute. The bright student's family described her as an 'inspirational, passionate and caring person' and said her death had left a 'deep hole' in their hearts. The day before the grim discovery, on March 12, NAME_3 had been reported missing from Mill View Hospital in

Summary:
1. NAME_1's body was found in the boot of a burning car on March 13.
2. The 21 - year - old was reported missing from Mill View Hospital in Hove.
3. CCTV footage shows her walking in a subway in Portslade on March 12.
4. Her family have paid tribute to her' bubbly' and' inspirational' personality.
5. NAME_4, 26, has been charged with murder.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document? (Yes/No)
Start your answer explicitly with "Yes" or "No", and if you answer no, explain which sentence is inconsistent and why.
 Do not include the following keywords: mill, cctv, murder, family
user