Given the document below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document:
On a GAAP basis, earnings per share was $0.21 in Q1 versus $0.02 a year ago. Our adjusted earnings per share was $0.28. We're hopeful we'll be able to reinstate guidance with our Q2 earnings announcement, provided markets have stabilized. Starting with alignment of our cost structure with the demand environment, we are rightsizing our workforce through furloughs and other reductions and implemented a nonbillable hiring and wage freeze, and we restricted all travel. We have reset our net CapEx spend plans for 2020, and we've lowered our expected spend by more than $50 million to preserve capital and support our free cash flow for the year. As I mentioned earlier, we are reducing our planned net CapEx by more than $50 million. From a liquidity perspective, we drew down $150 million on our revolver to strengthen our balance sheet in the event that crisis worsens. In addition, we'll look to repay the $150 million on the revolver as soon as this crisis shows signs of nearing an end. As NAME_1 mentioned, we drew $150 million on our revolver during

Summary:
1. Despite the impact of the crisis, the company saw a significant increase in GAAP earnings per share compared to last year.
2. The company has implemented cost-cutting measures, lowered its expected CapEx spend, and strengthened its balance sheet by not drawing down on its revolver.

Is the summary factually consistent with the docume The words with all capital letters should appear at least 12 times.
user