Given the document below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document:
"If I'd been in her shoes, I would have sacked me too," he told the BBC. NAME_1 said he regretted standing for the Tory leadership, saying he made "mistakes" in the way he withdrew his support from NAME_2. He now had to take the consequences of his decision, including the fact that an act of treachery has become widely known as "doing a NAME_3", he said. The 49-year-old former justice secretary made the comments during an interview with NAME_4, to be broadcast on BBC One on Sunday. He appeared to suggest he had not given up on a return to front-line politics, saying he hoped to "make a contribution" in the future. NAME_1 said his decision to back Leave in the EU referendum had placed a "significant strain" on his relationship with his long-term friend NAME_5. He and his wife, Daily Mail journalist NAME_6,

Summary:
1. NAME_7 has said he accepts that being sacked by theresa NAME_8 was the `` right thing to do''.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document? (Yes/No)
Start your answer explicitly with "Yes" or "No", and if you answer no, explain which sentence is inconsistent and why.
 In your entire response, the letter p should appear less than 27.
user