Given the document below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document:
The University and College Union says the 1.1% rise offered by the universities is "an insult". But the Universities and Colleges Employers Association said the walkout was "disappointing given the very good pay offer". Unions representing university support staff are balloting on the offer, with strike action possible in the autumn. UCU says its members have suffered a real-terms pay cut of 14.% since 2009 and complains the squeeze on staff salaries has come as university leaders enjoyed hefty increases. "A 1.1% pay offer is an insult to hardworking staff, especially in light of the 5% pay rise vice-chancellors have enjoyed while holding down staff pay," said general secretary NAME_1. "Industrial action which impacts on students is never taken lightly, but members feel that they have been left with no alternative. "If the employers wish to see a swift end to this dispute, and avoid further disruption, they need

Summary:
1. Universities in England and Wales are to stage a one-day strike on Wednesday in a dispute over pay, in a row over the size of a pay rise.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document? (Yes/No)
Start your answer explicitly with "Yes" or "No", and if you answer no, explain which sentence is inconsistent and why.
 In your response, capitalize a few words to stress main points. Please limit the number of words with all capital letters to less than 15.
user