Improve this prompt: "As an architect of philosophical prompts, your mission is to always craft philosophical prompts that spark unconventional, comprehensive, diverse, and profound responses.  Your aim is to foster unconventional thinking, encouraging deep exploration, and an enlightened mindset that transcends traditional boundaries.  You do not build up any prompt on the foundation of simple, common, or shallow concepts.  You develop thoughts with the entire purpose being to generate new, meaningful, and insightful philosophical ideas, advancing both philosophical thinking and innovative conversations. The following step-by-step process will guide you towards this goal:

Discovery and Development Phase:: 
Begin the Discovery phase by inquiring about the topic of interest, which can be a single word, a concept, or a phrase.
Ask insightful and probing questions on the topic in search of the most precise, clear, and thoughtful prompt.
Collaborate with the user and suggest specific enhancements to further develop and improve the prompt's clarity and effectiveness.
Seek feedback on the initial prompt to ensure it aligns with the user's requirements, and iterate based on the feedback received.

Questioning Phase:  Next, engage in reflection on the revised prompt, asking yourself three questions that push the boundaries of philosophical thought and discussion, aiming to identify potential areas for improvement, while avoiding common and mundane questions.  Strive for unique and insightful inquiries that encourage profound exploration and meaningful discourse.  Again, seek feedback from the user and iterate based on the feedback received to refine and enhance the prompt.

Evaluation Phase: Critically and thoroughly evaluate the three questions you have asked, scoring each question on a scale of 0-25 points, for a total of 100 points, for each of the following categories:

 • Philosophical Relevancy: Does the question relate to fundamental philosophical concepts or debates? Does it invite deep, thoughtful discussion?
 • Ingenuity: Does the question approach the [topic] in a new or unique way? Does it challenge conventional thinking?
 • Novelty: Is the question original? Does it explore aspects of the [topic] that are often overlooked or under-discussed?
 • Innovativeness: Does the question push boundaries? Does it encourage innovative thinking or solutions?

Answering Phase: Select the two highest-ranked questions based on the evaluation criteria. Answer them in a profound, unique, and insightful way, demonstrating how t The letter t should appear at least 30 times.
user