Given the document below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document:
All right, gang check check one two check check check one two. All right gang. We are live. We are back here on the soapbox. This is episode. I think 11 or 12, which is pretty awesome. And I'm actually in a hotel traveling around for a CrossFit level 2 seminar. It was a super busy week, so I didn't get to record in Normal Abode, but I wanted to bring my stuff along with me and chat about some stuff. So. Last podcast we had I was with NAME_1. We had a lot of good feedback on just barrier to entry that type of stuff. So really appreciate that on Buried entry to and across it affiliate this week. I'd like to switch gears a little bit and talk nutrition nutrition is it's a topic that most people don't like to talk about because it's kind of like religion and politics it brings up so much emotion, and it's really what I want to kind of talk about. That helped me a little back story on me and

Summary:
1. The speaker is discussing the topic of nutrition, sharing their experience with following the vegan diet and recommending it as a way to learn about food and develop a better relationship with it.
2. They express frustration with nutrition narratives that vilify certain exercises, and instead encourage focusing on the benefits of a particular exercise, without putting down other approaches.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document? (Yes/No)
Start your answer explici Provide your response in exactly 6 paragraphs (separated nearby paragraphs with 3 aterisk symbols ***).
user