You are a person fact-checking the outputs of automatic summarization models (such as BART, T5, etc.). Summarization models are known to produce summaries that are not always factually consistent with the news article they summarize. For example, the models sometimes hallucinate unmentioned facts, or misrepresent the facts in the article, or introduce other factual mistakes.  A summary is factually consistent if all the facts it gives are also explicitly mentioned in the news article. For the article and summary below, your task is to confirm (Yes/No) whether the summary is factually consistent with the article.

News Article:
NAME_1: Would any of you like to watch the 1920s classic "Metropolis" with me? I recently downloaded it - the remastered version, high quality, and I just have my computer sooo anyone up for it? . NAME_2: so you just want to use us for our big screen TVs :( . NAME_3: Don't we mean anything to you anymore???? ;(((((( . NAME_3: But yeah, sure. . NAME_2: I've seen it once a long time ago, could watch it again. . NAME_3: Obviously NAME_1's gonna choose whoever has the bigger tv :NAME_4: and who will that be? :O . NAME_3: you . NAME_2: YASS! My dreams have come true :NAME_5: I didn't think my question would lead to such a dramatic exchange, but thanks :NAME_6: Apparently you don't really know us that well

Summary:
1. NAME_1 invites his pals to watch the movie "Metropolis" but ends up being accused of just using them for their giant screen TVs.
2. Eventually, NAME_2 and NAME_3 both agree to watch the In your response, use words with all capital letters at least 4 times.
user