Given the document below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document:
MENENIUS: What is granted them? NAME_1: Five tribunes to defend their vulgar wisdoms, Of their own choice: one's NAME_2, Sicinius Velutus, and I know not--'Sdeath! The rabble should have first unroof'd the city, Ere so prevail'd with me: it will in time Win upon power and throw forth greater themes For insurrection's arguing. MENENIUS: This is strange. NAME_1: Go, get you home, you fragments! NAME_3: Where's NAME_4? NAME_1: Here: what's the matter? NAME_3: The news is, sir, the Volsces are in arms. NAME_1: I am glad on 't: then we shall ha' means to vent Our musty superfluity. See, our best elders. First Senator: NAME_1, 'tis true that you have lately told us; The Volsces are in arms. NAME_1: They have a leader, NAME_5, that will put you to 't. I sin in envying his nobility, And were I any thing but what I am, I would wish me only he. COMINIUS: You have fought together. NAME_1: Were half to half the world by the ears and he. Upon my party, I'ld revolt to make Only my

Summary:
1. The document concerns the discussion of a looming war, with NAME_1 as a key figure, whose pride, heroism, and ambition intertwine with his relationship with Cominius and the tribunes.
2. As tensions surge among the characters, they ready themselves for conflict, emphasizing the complexities of politics, honor, and partnerships.

Is the summary factually consistent with  Please answer in JSON format.
user