Take the following letter and simplify it with the instructions I give you:

This letter wishes to recommend to the Mayor and the City Council its opinion and the very relevant precedents surrounding the homelessness situation, and the criticality of the response to it. This letter will not try to address the causes or solutions to homelessness, and defers to existing studies on homelessness such as the largest ever study conducted in the U.S. since the ‘90s by the UCSF a few weeks ago, but rather the local response to it in London. We wish to emphasize the delicacy of the decision and the severity of its impact on the London population, especially the sizable community of students across multiple institutions. This letter emphasizes the three key exposure fronts of economic, safety, and societal, including reputational exposure, and our recommendation that hubs be located away from downtown and other student-proximal locations.
With respect to societal impact, we believe the identity of the city is significantly at stake, the damage of which is irreversible for many years or decades, as evidenced by the impact on cities like Windsor, who has yet to recover from its past decision to place homeless hubs near downtown. We believe this effect will similarly, or more greatly, impact the reputation of the academic institutions and the decision for students to choose London for their studies. London has spent decades building the incredible reputation it has for both prospective residents and students to choose a strong, safe, beautiful, and lively city, and has been fortunate in having that differentiated reputation well established in the academic world. That hard-earned reputation can be recklessly destroyed in a single year if not treated with the respect and delicacy it critically deserves.
With respect to safety, significant data and case studies exist on the exposure students have to homeless groups, as evidenced by numerous leading academic institutions admonishing their students not to stray from the boundaries of the institution, such as USC in Los Angeles, Yale in New Haven, University of Chicago, and UC Berkely in California. The representative city policies in those regions similarly failed their student constituents, whereas other cities and institutions had more effectively addressed the issue, and saw significant improvements in exposure, such as UPenn, University of Illinois, and even the University of Detroit Mercy. These latter institutions had seen positive effects from active gentrification of critic Provide the entire answer in JSON format.
user