Given the document below, determine if the summary is factually consistent with the document. A summary is factually consistent if all the numbers in the summary are presented the same way as in the document.

Document: The payments, funded by taxpayers, were made through a legal loophole, an Associated Press investigation has uncovered. Some are still being paid. Former guards at Nazi labour camps, where millions died, are among them. The US justice department says benefits are paid to individuals who renounce US citizenship and leave voluntarily. But there is anger that public money is being used in this way. "It's absolutely outrageous that Nazi war criminals are continuing to receive Social Security benefits when they have been outlawed from our country for many, many, many years," said Congresswoman NAME_1. Getting paid: She said she plans to introduce legislation to close the legal loophole. Four World War Two suspects are said to still be alive and collecting benefits. One is former SS guard NAME_2, another is Auschwitz camp patroller NAME_3 NAME_4. Mr NAME_5 is said to have moved to Berlin from Arizona in 2007,

Summary: 1. The US justice department says benefits are not paid to individuals who renounce US citizenship and leave voluntarily.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document with respect to numbers?
Options: "Yes" or "No"

Answer:


 Please answer in JSON format.
user