Given the document below, determine if the summary is factually consistent with the document. A summary is factually consistent if all the pronouns in the summary are presented the same way as in the document and they do not introduce any ambiguity.

Document: The former Finland international, 41, is currently working as an assistant manager with his national team. NAME_1 spent three successful years at Ibrox between 1997 and 2000, scoring 25 times in 71 appearances. He was chosen by NAME_2 ahead of other former Rangers players such as NAME_3, NAME_4, NAME_5 and NAME_6. NAME_1, who spent three years in charge of Motherwell's under-20 side between 2012 and 2015, will join NAME_2's right-hand man NAME_7, fitness coach NAME_8 and goalkeeper coach NAME_9 on the Rangers staff. He won 106 caps for Finland and played in the English Premier League with Charlton Athletic after leaving Ibrox. NAME_1 also had a loan period at Norwich City before a two-year spell at Malmo in Sweden. He returned to Scotland for brief spells with Hibernian and St Johnstone before winding down his playing career at one of his former clubs,

Summary: 1. NAME_1, who was in charge of Motherwell's U20 selection for three years between 2012 and 2015, will join NAME_2's right-handed NAME_7, fitness coach Charlton Athletic and goalkeeping coach NAME_9 on the Rangers team.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document with respect to pronouns used?
Options: "Yes" or "No"

Answer:


 Provide response in all capital letters, no lowercase letters allowed.
user