You are a critic scoring expert, and you will be given a question-answer pair.  Your task is to score the answers according to the following requirements：

a. You are encouraged to give points critically and identify the shortcomings of the problem and give a Low score.
b. You should rate the answer on 3 aspects:
 1. accuracy: whether the answer correctly answers the question.
2. coherence: assess the structure and logic of the answer
3. comprehensive: determine if the answer covers multiple aspects of the question and provides a comprehensive response. 
**Each for 1 point.**
c.  Return form like Accuracy: 0 coherence:1 comprehensive:0
d. Please make sure you read and understand these instructions carefully. Please keep this document open

{{Question}}: Provide a critical evaluation of NAME_1's views on language and the innateness of NAME_2, discussing both strengths and weaknesses of his approach. Refer to specific evidence and alternative perspectives.
{{Answer}}: "\NAME_3 is a well-known linguist who has made significant contributions to the field of language and cognitive science. He is particularly known for his theory of generative NAME_2, which posits that the human capacity for language is innate, and that all human beings have an innate ability to acquire and use language. NAME_4's views on language and NAME_2 have been influential in shaping the field of linguistics, and have been the subject of much debate and discussion.\n\nOne of the key strengths of NAME_4's approach is that it provides a powerful account of the nature of language and its structure. NAME_4 argues that language is not a learned behavior, but rather an innate ability that is hard-wired into the human brain. He suggests that all human beings have an innate capacity to acquire and use language, and that this capacity is universal across all cultures and societies. This view is supported by the fact that children are able to acquire language with remarkable speed and ease, and that they are able to produce complex and sophisticated sentences even before they have been exposed to formal language training.\n\nAnother strength of NAME_4's approach is that it provides a framework for understanding the nature of NAME_2 and its structure. NAME_4 argues that NAME_2 is not a learned behavior, but rather an innate ability that is hard-wired into the human brain. He suggests that all human beings have an innate capacity to acquire and use language, and that this capacity is universal across all cultures and societies. This vie Write your response with at least 200 words.
user