Given the document below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document:
NAME_1 is adamant he can keep NAME_2 in the Barclays Premier League after a 2-0 defeat by NAME_3 left them battling to stay up. At the start of the campaign NAME_4 was targeting 10 wins to survive, but despite a strong start his NAME_5 side have mustered just six and he is hoping 'nine or eight might be enough.' NAME_5 were the better side against NAME_3 for the first 45 minutes but a NAME_6 Ward-Prowse penalty and late strike from NAME_7 meant they left with nothing. NAME_1 is confident he can keep NAME_2 in the Premier League this season and avoid relegation . They now have six games to save their season including nightmare fixtures against Liverpool, Arsenal, Tottenham and Manchester United. But NAME_4 insisted: 'Everyone is up for the challenge and I'm sure and convinced that we'll do it. If we keep remaining positive

Summary:
1. NAME_2 were beaten 2-0 by NAME_3 at St Mary 's on Saturday .
2. NAME_1 's side are now just two points clear of the relegation zone .
3. The NAME_5 boss is hoping ` nine or eight might be enough ' to stay up .
4. NAME_3 moved up to fifth in the table ahead of Tottenham .

Is the summary factually consistent with the document? (Yes/No)
Start your answer explicitly with "Yes" or "No", and if you answer no, explain which sentence is inconsistent and why.
 Do not say the word "penalty" in the response
user