Given the document below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document:
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the ``Payroll Tax Holiday Act of 2009''. SEC. 2. PAYROLL TAX HOLIDAY FOR SMALL BUSINESSES. (a) In General.--Subchapter C of chapter 21 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to Federal Insurance Contributions Act) is amended by redesignating section 3128 as section 3129 and by inserting after section 3127 the following new section: ``SEC. 3128. PAYROLL TAX HOLIDAY FOR SMALL BUSINESSES DURING PORTION OF 2009. ``(a) Payroll Taxes.--In the case of an eligible small business, the rate of the taxes imposed by sections 3101(a) and 3111(a) shall be zero with respect to remuneration paid during the payroll tax holiday period, including for purposes of determining the rates of tax under sections 3201(a) and 3221(a) with respect to compensation paid during such period. ``(b) Self-Employment Taxes.--In the case of an eligible small business-- ``(1) In general.--For purposes of the tax imposed by section 1401(a), the self-employment income of the taxpayer for the taxable year (determined without regard to this subsection) shall be reduced by the payroll tax holiday period income

Summary:
1. Payroll Tax Holiday Act of 2009 - Amends the Internal Revenue Code to reduce employment and self-employment taxes between the enactment of this Act and January 1, 2010, for small business owners who employ 50 or fewer employees.

Is the summary factu Do not include the following keywords: chapter, case, employment, remuneration
user