Given the document below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document:
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; TABLE OF CONTENTS. (a) Short Title.--This Act may be cited as the ``Grand River Band of Ottawa Indians of Michigan Referral Act''. (b) Table of Contents.--The table of contents of this Act is as follows: Sec. 1. Short title; table of contents. Sec. 2. Definitions. TITLE I--REFERRAL TO THE SECRETARY Sec. 101. Purpose. Sec. 102. Report. Sec. 103. Action by Congress. TITLE II--MEMBERSHIP; JURISDICTION; LAND Sec. 201. Recognition. Sec. 202. Membership. Sec. 203. Federal services and benefits. Sec. 204. Rights of the Tribe. Sec. 205. Tribal funds. Sec. 206. Jurisdiction of trust land. SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. In this Act: (1) Band; tribe.--The terms ``Band'' and ``Tribe'' mean the Grand River Band of the Ottawa Indians of Michigan. (2) Date of recognition.--The term ``date of recognition'' means the date on which recognition of the Tribe by the Secretary was published in the Federal Register under section 201. (3) Indian tribe.--The term ``Indian tribe'' has the meaning given the term in section 4 of the Indian Self- Determination and Education Assistance Act (25 U.S.C. 450b). (4) Secretary.--The term

Summary:
1. Grand River Band of Ottawa Indians of Michigan Referral Act - Provides for a review of the petition of the Grand River Band of the Ottawa Indians of Nebraska for recognition as a Federal Indian tribe.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document?  Add stress words which are capitalized. Limit those stress words for less than 4 times.
user