Given the document below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document:
The NAME_1 administration unveiled new details Thursday of how it will seek to get the most bang for the billions it has at its disposal to spur the semiconductor sector in the U.S. The centerpiece of the plans, which Commerce Secretary NAME_2 laid out during a speech, is the creation of at least two semiconductor manufacturing and research hubs in the U.S. These sites--she hopes--will create new U.S. manufacturing and research capabilities and supply chains that will generate momentum for the sector even after the government money runs out. "I want to talk about the vision," NAME_3 began her speech, comparing the effort to major moments in U.S. history. "The CHIPS and Science Act presents us with an opportunity to make investments that are similarly consequential for our nation's future." Secretary of Commerce NAME_2 speaks about semiconductors at the White House in September. (REUTERS/NAME_4) NAME_3 spoke at Georgetown University as she moved on to the next phase of the heady task of handing out about $50 billion in government funds to spur semiconductor manufacturing and research in

Summary:
1. The NAME_1 administration is revealing audacious plans Thursday for how it will seek to get the most bang for the billions it has at its disposal to propel the semiconductor sector in the U.S. in the years ahead.

Is the summary factually consistent with the docum Write your answer without using the letter b whatsoever in your entire response.
user