Given the document below, determine if the summary is factually consistent with the document. Together with the answer provide evidence that supports it. 

Example Document: NAME_1 remains on course to win a record-equaling 22nd grand slam title after beating American NAME_2 in straight sets in the Australian Open semifinals Friday, setting up a mouthwatering final with NAME_3. The Serbian faced stiff opposition from the big-hitting NAME_4 in his 7-5 6-1 6-2 victory to reach his 33rd grand slam final. His victory came just hours after Tsitsipas had beaten Russian NAME_5 7-6 (7-2) 6-4 6-7 (6-8) 6-3 to reach his second career grand slam final.

Example Summary 1: NAME_1 won a record-equaling 22nd grand slam title after beating NAME_2 in straight sets at the Australian Open on Friday.

Answer "Yes" or "No" and provide evidence.

Answer: No, the summary is not factually correct.
The document states that:
NAME_1 beat NAME_2 in the Australian Open semifinals on Friday.
NAME_1 will face NAME_3 in the final.
Therefore, it is not known whether NAME_1 has won the final match.



Given the document below, determine if the summary is factually consistent with the document. Together with the answer provide evidence that supports it.

Document: NAME_6's resignation takes immediate effect and follows a week of heated debate about the plans. It has been proposed that the Sisters of Charity will be sole owners of the new facility at the  Provide the entire answer in JSON format.
user