Given the document below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document:
NAME_1: Poor painted queen, vain flourish of my fortune! Why strew'st thou sugar on that bottled spider, Whose deadly web ensnareth thee about? Fool, fool! thou whet'st a knife to kill thyself. The time will come when NAME_2 wish for me To help thee curse that poisonous bunchback'd toad. HASTINGS: False-boding woman, end thy frantic curse, Lest to thy harm thou move our patience. NAME_1: Foul shame upon you! you have all moved mine. RIVERS: Were you well served, you would be taught your duty. NAME_1: To serve me well, you all should do me duty, Teach me to be your queen, and you my subjects: O, serve me well, and teach yourselves that duty! DORSET: Dispute not with her; she is lunatic. NAME_1: Peace, master NAME_3, you are malapert: Your fire-new stamp of honour is scarce current. O, that your young nobility could judge What 'twere to lose it, and be miserable! They that stand high have many blasts to shake them; And if they fall, they dash themselves to pieces. GLOUCESTER: Good counsel,

Summary:
1. In this scene, NAME_1 is warning others of NAME_4's toxic conduct, while NAME_4 manipulates others into believing that the queen and her allies are conspiring against him.
2. However, deep down, NAME_4 is aware of his own mischievous actions and manages to deceive others by hiding behind a facade of saintliness.

Is the summary factually The word "facade" should not appear in your response.
user