Please help me with writing a academic response to reviewers' comments.

Comments to the Author: 
This is a very solid paper on a fabric defect detection algorithm utilizing a learnable color space. In this approach, RGB representation is transformed into a new color space to facilitate the detection of fabric defects using an auto-encoder model.  The algorithm is very well reasoned. The mathematics is solid. The results are clear and convincing.  I only have several suggestions on the writing style of this manuscript.
Question: The illustrative example in Figure 1 can be better explained. For example, it took this reviewer some back-and-forth readings to realize that the squares in (a) represent defects. It would be useful to make this clearer or include another image to show the range of the ground truth defects as in the result section.

Below is my response. Please polish the writing to meet the academic style, improve the spelling, grammar, clarity, concision and overall readability. When necessary, you can rewrite some sentences.

Thank you for your valuable suggestion. We have made some efforts to improve our manuscript follow your suggestions.
To improve this, we have included ground-truth mask images in Figure 1(a) and 1(b) to provide a more explicit depiction of the defects, with color bars to show the value range.
Furthermore, we have revised the description in the main text and the figure caption to clarify that these color squares are used to demonstrate possible colors of defects. Limit your response to 350 words.
user