Given the document below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document:
NAME_1 E: Um so this might be What next ? Professor B: Well you tell me , so in terms of the uh planner what 's what 's a good one to do ? NAME_1 E: Well let 's th this go there or not I think is a good one . Professor B: Uh NAME_1 E: Is a very basic one . So what makes things more likely that Professor B: Well the fir see the first thing is , getting back to thing we left out of the other is the actual discourse . NAME_1 E: So Professor B: So NAME_2 this is gonna get into your world because uh we 're gonna want to know you know , which constructions indicate various of these properties NAME_3: Mm - hmm . Mm - hmm . Professor B: s and so I I don't yet know how to do this , I guess we 're gonna wind up pulling out uh discourse properties like we have object properties and we don't know what they are yet . NAME_1

Summary:
1. The document discusses the Stay-here decision and the need for a user model to represent it.
2. The group considers different values for the Stay-here node, including "yes" and "no," and also discusses the importance of combining situational nodes and creating loops in the belief propagation.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document? (Yes/No)
Start your answer explicitly with "Yes" or "No", and if you answer no, explain which sentence is inconsistent and why.
 Your entire response should be in English, and in all capital letters.
user