Given the document below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document:
Frappuccinos are passe and milk and two sugars is practically prehistoric - the next coffee trend involves olive oil and it's launching in Italy on Wednesday. Starbucks is debuting a range of olive oil-infused drinks in its 20 Italian stores, with plans to bring the drinks to the UK later this year. Chief executive NAME_1 said the idea struck him when he adopted the Italian custom of taking a daily spoonful of olive oil while travelling in Sicily last year. He said he started adding it to his coffee and found it produced an "unexpected, velvety, buttery flavour that enhanced the coffee and lingers beautifully on the palate". The Oleato olive oil range includes a latte, cold brew and the "Oleato deconstructed", which pairs espresso with olive oil "infused with a luxurious passionfruit cold foam". "Now, there's going to be people who say, 'Olive oil in coffee? But the proof is in the cup," Mr NAME_2 said. "In over 40 years, I can't remember a moment in time where I've been more excited, more enthused that demonstrates the pride,

Summary:
1. Starbucks faced a protest when it first opened in Italy in 2017 - but the chain has come back swinging with an olive oil range of coffee launching in Italy on Wednesday.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document? (Yes/No)
Start your answer explicitly with "Yes" or "No", and if you answer no, explain which sentence is inconsi Do not include the following keywords: espresso, passionfruit, inconsi, drink
user