please rewrite the following book comments, using the tone of the Economist. 'Neuromancer by NAME_1

I won't talk about how good this book is. There are already so much praise about it and it is one of the greatest scientific fiction with super advanced vision.

But, but it's such a difficult book to read, especially to a non-English reader.

First, the book starts in the middle of a story. I could only grasp the essense of the story until I finished one third of the book, and I had to go through the first few chapters so many times because none of the things made sense to me.

Second, the author creates a whole new word. This means that there are so many new words that I can't find their meanings in a dictionary. To make things even worse, there are a lot of advanced words that I don't recognize. The mixture of created words and advanced English words makes my reading experience awful. My most responses during reading is "wait! What are you talking about?!"

Finally, the writing style is difficult to understand. It's so succinct and the author often doesn't explain how it goes and why things are like that, leaving the readers to make the connections. This might be good but really not reader-friendly.

So my conclusion is if you're a crazy fan of cyberpunk, don't bother to read the English version. It's a torture.' Write your response with exactly 7 paragraphs, separated with the markdown divider: ***.
user