Summarize the following in less than 50 words.

The Faculty Senate voted to approve revisions to Stanford's NAME_1, allowing exam proctoring for the first time since 1921. This move ends the shared governance between faculty and students and bypasses a student vote. The motion argued that current mechanisms are insufficient to ensure the academic integrity of the university, and the C12's proposed Academic Integrity Working Group was not mentioned.
The Faculty Senate revised the NAME_1 to allow for proctoring of in-person exams and other academic activities to foster a climate of academic honesty and fair assessment. This revision will take effect if all stakeholders, including the UGS, GSC, BJA, and Stanford President, approve the C12's proposed NAME_1 edits. If the UGS does not pass the C12's proposals, then the faculty will be allowed to proctor beginning in September.
The C12 charter required approval from all relevant parties, including the BJA, ASSU legislative bodies, Faculty Senate, and Stanford's President, for any proposed revisions to the NAME_1 to take effect. The Faculty Senate approved the C12's revisions, but UGS did not support them. The latest Faculty Senate motion, introducing proctoring, was passed without cooperation from student bodies.
| Please reply with exactly 7 paragraphs and separate each paragraph with two new lines. The very last paragraph must start with the word "difficult".
user