Given the document below, determine if the summary is factually consistent with the document. A summary is factually consistent if all the dates and times in the summary are presented the same way as in the document.

Document: Jesper Hart-NAME_1 was also banned from driving for four-and-a-half years. He will have to pass an extended test if he ever wants to drive in the UK again. The 50-year-old, from Denmark, admitted causing a head-on crash on the A85 near Comrie in January last year. NAME_2, 50, was seriously hurt in the collision. Perth Sheriff Court heard how Hart-NAME_1 momentarily forgot he was not in his native Denmark and turned out of his holiday home onto the wrong side of the road. He managed to drive for nearly a mile on the wrong side of the road before causing a head-on crash with the first vehicle he encountered on the A85. NAME_3 told him he was imposing a significant fine because it was not practical to give him any other community-based work order as he lived outwith the UK. Hart-NAME_1's case made Scottish legal history as

Summary: 1. NAME_4, from Oban, was off work for a year as a result of her injuries.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document with respect to dates and times?
Options: "Yes" or "No"

Answer:


 Your response should contain 350+ words.
user