Split the following text into paragraphs, putting two blank lines between paragraphs:

NAME_1.
200 U. S. 
Opinion of the Court.
NAME_2 v. TERRITORY OF NEW MEXICO ex rel.
NAME_3.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF NEW
MEXICO.
No. 229. Submitted November 27, 1905.-Decided January 2.1906.
The renewal in this court of a motion to dismiss the appeal which was consid-
ered and denied by the Supreme Court of the Territory amounts to no more
than an assignment of error to the actioa of that court in this regard, to be
passed on or disposed of as such, if this court otherwise has jurisdiction.
In the proceedings in qao warranto in this case the alleged usurpation of the
office is the matter in dispute, and the liability to fine on judgment of
ouster or the effect of the judgment in a subsequent action to recover the
emoluments of the office does not make that matter measurable by some
sum or value in money, and an appeal to this court will not lie from the
Supreme Court of a Territory under either section of the act of March 3,
1885, c. 355.
Tm facts are stated in the opinion.
NAME_4 for appellant.
NAME_5 for appellee.
MR. CHIEF JUSTICE FULLER delivered the opinion of the court.
This was a proceeding in quo warranto brought in the District
Court of Bernalillo County, New Mexico, July 20, 1903, by the
Territory on the relation of NAME_6 against George
F. NAME_2, it being alleged that NAME_3 was duly elected to
the office of assessor of Bernalillo County for the term of two
years from the first (lay of January, 1903; that he duly qualified
and entered on the discharge of the duties of the office; and that
he had never resigned, vacated or abandoned the office, and
ever since his election and qualification had continued to dis-
charge the duties thereof. 
It was further alleged that on Provide the entire answer in JSON format.
user