Given the document below, determine if the summary is factually consistent with the document. A summary is factually consistent if all the numbers in the summary are presented the same way as in the document.

Document: NAME_1, 39, shot the teenager, who was riding on the back of a motorcycle, on Hewitt Avenue in Sunderland in October. NAME_2 admitted causing grievous bodily harm with intent and possession of an air rifle without a firearms certificate, at Newcastle Crown Court. The victim suffered a "serious head wound" and was taken to Newcastle's Royal Victoria Infirmary. NAME_2, of Hewitt Avenue, also admitted another firearms charge but denied perverting the course of justice. He has been remanded in custody. A teenager who was charged in connection with the incident has been bailed. The driver of the motorbike was not hurt in the attack. The case was adjourned until sentencing on 25 April.

Summary: 1. NAME_2 admitted causing grievous bodily harm with intent and possession of an air rifle without a firearms certificate, at Royal Victoria Infirmary.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document with respect to numbers?
Options: "Yes" or "No"

Answer:


 Do not say the word "victim" in the response
user