Given the document below, determine if the summary is factually consistent with the document. A summary is factually consistent if no facts in the summary reflect the negation of a fact in the document.

Document: NAME_1, 25, of Invergordon, was arrested after police discovered the drugs at his former home in Inverness on 28 January last year. The High Court in Edinburgh heard that he was keeping the drugs because he owed money to dealers. He was convicted of supplying cocaine and cannabis at an earlier hearing.

Summary: 1. The High Court in Edinburgh was told she was keeping the drugs because he owed the dealers money.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document with respect to facts?
Options: "Yes" or "No"

Answer:


 Provide your reponse without using the word court.
user