Given the document below, determine if the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Example Document: NAME_1 remains on course to win a record-equaling 22nd grand slam title after beating American NAME_2 in straight sets in the Australian Open semifinals Friday, setting up a mouthwatering final with NAME_3. The Serbian faced stiff opposition from the big-hitting NAME_4 in his 7-5 6-1 6-2 victory to reach his 33rd grand slam final. His victory came just hours after Tsitsipas had beaten Russian NAME_5 Khachanov 7-6 (7-2) 6-4 6-7 (6-8) 6-3 to reach his second career grand slam final.

Example Summary 1: NAME_1 will face NAME_3 in the Australian Open final after beating NAME_2 in straight sets.

Options: "Yes" or "No"

Answer: Yes, the summary is factually consistent with the article.



Given the document below, determine if the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document: Jesper NAME_6-NAME_7 was also banned from driving for four-and-a-half years. He will have to pass an extended test if he ever wants to drive in the UK again. The 50-year-old, from Denmark, admitted causing a head-on crash on the A85 near Comrie in January last year. NAME_8, 50, was seriously hurt in the collision. Perth Sheriff Court heard how NAME_6-NAME_7 momentarily forgot he was not in his native Denmark and turned out of his holiday home onto the wrong side of the road. He managed to drive for nearly a mile on the wrong side of the road before causing a head-on crash Avoid using the following keywords: australian, name_7, court, side
user