Given the document below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document:
An open pit mine collapsed in China's northern Inner Mongolia region on Wednesday, killing at least two people and leaving more than 50 missing, state media reported. The official Xinhua News Agency said people were buried under debris at the mine in Alxa League. Rescuers brought out three people, two of whom showed no signs of life. Other state media reports gave the total number of missing at 57 and said numerous vehicles were also buried in the collapse. CHINA SHARPLY CRITICIZES PENTAGON AFTER DEFENSE OFFICIAL VISITED TAIWAN Inner Mongolia is a key region for mining coal and other minerals in China, which critics say has ravaged the original landscape of mountains, grassy steppe and deserts. CHINA FURIOUS AFTER US WARNS AGAINST ARMING RUSSIA: 'THE US IS IN NO POSITION TO TELL CHINA WHAT TO DO' China overwhelmingly relies on coal for power generation, but has strived to reduce the number of deadly mine accidents through a greater emphasis on safety and the closure of smaller operations that lacked necessary equipment. Most mining deaths are attributed to explosions caused by

Summary:
1. A Chinese mine collapse killed at least two people and left over 50 others trapped.
2. Chinese officials say numerous vehicles were also buried in the collapse.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document? (Yes/No)
Start your answer explicitly with "Yes" or "No", and if you answer no,  There should be exactly 5 paragraphs separated by the markdown divider: ***.
user