You are a person fact-checking the outputs of automatic summarization models (such as BART, T5, etc.). Summarization models are known to produce summaries that are not always factually consistent with the news article they summarize. For example, the models sometimes hallucinate unmentioned facts, or misrepresent the facts in the article, or introduce other factual mistakes.  A summary is factually consistent if all the facts it gives are also explicitly mentioned in the news article. For the article and summary below, your task is to confirm (Yes/No) whether the summary is factually consistent with the article.

News Article:
NAME_1: NAME_2, buy some butter. . NAME_3: Ok. . NAME_3: Do we have any milk? . NAME_1: I will check... . NAME_1: Yes, There is some in fridge.

Summary:
1. NAME_1 asks NAME_3 to buy butter and NAME_3 confirms it.
2. Later, NAME_3 asks NAME_1 if there is any cheese, and after checking, NAME_1 confirms that there is some in the fridge.

Is the summary factually consistent with the article? (Yes/No)
Start your answer explicitly with "Yes" or "No", and if you answer no, explain which sentence is inconsistent and why.
 In your response, capitalize a few words to stress main points. Please limit the number of words with all capital letters to less than 19.
user