Given the document below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document:
NAME_1: They do me wrong, and I will not endure it: Who are they that complain unto the king, That I, forsooth, am stern, and love them not? By NAME_2, they love his grace but lightly That fill his ears with such dissentious rumours. Because I cannot flatter and speak fair, Smile in men's faces, smooth, deceive and cog, Duck with French nods and apish courtesy, I must be held a rancorous enemy. Cannot a plain man live and think no harm, But thus his simple truth must be abused By silken, NAME_3, insinuating NAME_4? RIVERS: To whom in all this presence speaks your grace? NAME_1: To thee, that hast nor honesty nor grace. When have I injured thee? when done thee wrong? Or thee? or thee? or any of your faction? A plague upon you all! His royal person,-- Whom God preserve better than you would wish!-- Cannot be quiet scarce a breathing-while, But you must trouble him with lewd complaints. NAME_5: Brother of NAME_1, you mistake the matter. The king, of his own royal disposition, And

Summary:
1. In this excerpt, NAME_1 defends himself against accusations of being too kind and loving towards those around him, citing his willingness to flatter and deceive.
2. Meanwhile, NAME_5 confronts NAME_1 for his lack of envy towards her and her friends, resulting in bitter exchanges and mutual accusations amongst the characters.

Is the summary factually consisten Make sure to only use capital letters in your entire response.
user