Given the document below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document:
Arsenal NAME_1 has been confirmed as the man who will present NAME_2 with his 20th and final champion NAME_3 at Sandown on Saturday. Track officials had been keen to secure someone with a connection to the club which the retiring rider fervently supports. NAME_4, who had seven seasons at Arsenal and broke every scoring record in the book, will hand over NAME_5's trophy before travelling back into London to present his BBC5Live radio phone in. NAME_2 will be presented with his final champion NAME_3 by NAME_6 at Sandown on Saturday NAME_4 (centre) is now a television pundit but played for Arsenal during his years as a professional NAME_5 is a huge Arsenal supporter and has been invited to attend a home game before the end of the season Sandown initially tried to secure NAME_7 to be the Arsenal celebrity to hand over

Summary:
1. NAME_6 will present NAME_2 with his 20th and final champion NAME_3 at sandown on saturday .
2. NAME_4 played for arsenal for seven years from 1991 until 1998 . NAME_5 is a huge arsenal supporter and has been invited to attend a home game before the end of the season .

Is the summary factually consistent with the document? (Yes/No)
Start your answer explicitly with "Yes" or "No", and if you answer no, explain which sentence is inconsistent and why.
 Limit your response to 400 words.
user