Given the document below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document:
NAME_1 Town manager NAME_2 NAME_3 was feeling less vibrant than his team's bright orange strip after they blew a chance to climb into the play-off places. The Tractor Boys, who have now lost four of their last five away games, were caught cold by goals in the opening 30 minutes by NAME_4 strike pair NAME_5 and NAME_6. NAME_3 responded by making two changes at half-time and was rewarded when NAME_7 reduced arrears earlier in the second period. . NAME_8 celebrates after giving his NAME_4 side the lead at the John NAME_9's Stadium. NAME_6 (right) doubled the lead for the home side and NAME_10's play-off hopes. NAME_4 (4-4-2): NAME_11; NAME_9, NAME_12, NAME_13, NAME_14, NAME_15; NAME_16 (NAME_17 89), NAME_12 Coady, NAME_18; NAME_19 (Edgar 83), NAME_20 (Lolley 90) Goals: NAME_19 12, NAME_20 30. NAME_1: NAME_21; Chambers, NAME_9, NAME_22, NAME_23; NAME_24 (Bishop 45), NAME_25 (Williams 67); NAME_26,

Summary:
1. NAME_1 fell behind to goals from NAME_5 and NAME_6.
2. NAME_7 scored a second - half header to give the Tractor Boys hope.
3. But NAME_4 held on to NAME_10's play - off hopes.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document? (Yes/No)
Start your answer explicitly with "Yes" or "No", and if you answer no, explain which sentence is inconsistent and why.
 Your answer should have exactly 5 paragraphs. Make sure that the last paragraph starts with the word "offer" and that each paragraph is separated by two new lines.
user