Given the document below, determine if the summary is factually consistent with the document.
A summary is factually consistent if all statements in the summary are entailed by the document.

Document: He was quoted by the state news agency NAME_1 as revealing that "official procedures" regarding his candidacy were expected in the coming days. It is the clearest indication yet that he will stand in the election which is scheduled to take place by mid-April. He led the overthrow of President NAME_2 in July. The NAME_3 has been widely expected to resign and declare a presidential bid since the Supreme Council of the Armed Forces (Scaf) gave its public support at the end of January. Correspondents say he would be likely to win, given his popularity and the lack of any serious rivals. NAME_3 Sisi commented on his prospective candidacy in a speech at a graduation ceremony at the Egyptian Military Academy in Cairo. He said he could "not turn his back on calls by the majority of Egyptians for him to run for president", NAME_1 reported. "Official

Summary: 1. She was quoted by the state news agency NAME_1 as revealing that "official procedures" regarding her candidacy were expected in the coming days.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document?
Start your answer with "Yes" or "No".

Answer:


 Repeat the request word for word before giving your answer.
user