Given the document below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document:
The Scottish government has already drafted legislation for a referendum after NAME_1 said another ballot was highly likely in the wake of the UK voting to leave the EU. But Ms NAME_2 told STV News that any referendum would not been held in 2017. Her predecessor, NAME_3, has predicted a vote on independence will be held in the autumn of next year. Ms NAME_2 said: "There is not going to be an independence referendum in 2017, I don't think there is anybody who thinks that is the case." She has previously said a vote on independence will be held if the Scottish government concludes it is the only way to protect Scotland's place in Europe. Ms NAME_2 has urged the UK government to negotiate a so-called soft Brexit and retain its membership of the single market. Failing that, she wants a special arrangement to allow Scotland to stay

Summary:
1. Scotland's first minister has ruled out an independence referendum in 2017, saying there is "no one who thinks that is the case".

Is the summary factually consistent with the document? (Yes/No)
Start your answer explicitly with "Yes" or "No", and if you answer no, explain which sentence is inconsistent and why.
 Write your response with exactly 3 paragraphs, separated with the markdown divider: ***.
user