Given the document below, determine if the summary is factually consistent with the document. A summary is factually consistent if all the dates and times in the summary are presented the same way as in the document.

Document: NAME_1, competing the day before her 22nd birthday, had originally been awarded C1 silver behind NAME_2. Judges later reversed their positions after adding a two-second penalty to the Australian world champion's time for hitting gate three. The women's C1 is not an Olympic event but is being proposed for inclusion in the 2020 Tokyo Games. "It was a bit of a struggle for everyone in the final," said NAME_1, who won gold ahead of NAME_3 when London hosted the World Cup in 2014. Compatriot NAME_4, the world under-23 champion, was sixth in the men's event.

Summary: 1. NAME_4, competing the day before her 22nd birthday, had originally been awarded C1 silver behind NAME_2.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document with respect to dates and times?
Options: "Yes" or "No"

Answer:


 Give two different versions of responses. Please separate the responses with 6 asterisk symbols: ******.
user