Given the document below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document:
A New York woman running an alleged wife-for-hire immigration scheme pleaded not guilty Friday based on charges that she married 10 men over 11 years and charged a fee for her 'services'. One of the men 38-year-old NAME_1 wed was deported back to Pakistan for making threatening statements against the United States in 2006 after an investigation by the Joint Terrorism Task Force, it has been revealed. NAME_2, originally from the Dominican Republican, lived with her partner and two children in the Bronx until her arrest in February, however was legally married to at least four people at the time. In court today, prosecutors said NAME_2 married men from Egypt, Bangladesh, Turkey, Czechoslovakia, Pakistan, NAME_3 and Georgia - countries that were 'red flags' for immigration, according to The New York Daily News. At one time she was married to eight men simultaneously. Always the bride: NAME_4, 39, of

Summary:
1. NAME_4 , 39 , of the bronx , pleaded not guilty on friday to two felony charges of filing a false instrument , involving marriage licences .
2. she is accused of marrying 10 men over the course of 11 years in an apparent immigrant scam .
3. authorities only cottoned on after she said her 2010 marriage to NAME_5 , of NAME_3 , was actually her first .
4. her first marriage took place in 1999 , with most recent being in 2010 .

Is the summary factually consistent with the document? (Yes/No)
Start your answer explicitly with "Yes" or "No", and if you answer no, explain which sentence is inconsistent and why.
 Make sure your entire response is wrapped in JSON format.
user