Given the document below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document:
The London-based telecoms provider said that it alerted police after carrying out a data security review. However, a spokeswoman stressed that it had seen no evidence that the suspects had been involved with a high-profile cyber-breach last October. Nearly 157,000 of TalkTalk customers' details, including bank account numbers, were stolen in the breach. The unnamed suspects do not work for TalkTalk directly but are instead employed by Wipro, a local call centre provider, in Kolkata (Calcutta). "Following the October 2015 cyber-attack, we have been conducting a forensic review to ensure that all aspects of our security are as robust as possible - including that of our suppliers," the company said. "Acting on information supplied by TalkTalk, the local police have arrested three individuals who have breached our policies and the terms of our contract with Wipro. We are also reviewing our relationship with Wipro. "We are determined to identify and

Summary:
1. Talktalk has confirmed that three of its employees in india have been arrested on suspicion of hacking.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document? (Yes/No)
Start your answer explicitly with "Yes" or "No", and if you answer no, explain which sentence is inconsistent and why.
 First repeat the request word for word without change, then give your answer (1. do not say any words or characters before repeating the request; 2. the request you need to repeat does not include this sentence).
user