Given the document below, determine if the summary is factually consistent with the document. A summary is factually consistent if all entity names in the summary are presented the same way as in the document.

Document: NAME_1, 26, has not played since damaging medial ligaments at Sunderland on 31 January but had been expected to return before the end of the season. He recently returned to training but it was discovered "the problem has not resolved fully", a club statement read. "Therefore a decision has been made to proceed to surgery." NAME_1 made 21 appearances for Spurs this season, 18 of those in the league, and scored two goals.

Summary: 1. NAME_1, 26, hasn't played since injuring his middle ligaments at Sunderland on January 31, but she was expected to return for the rest of the season.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document with respect to entity names?
Options: "Yes" or "No"

Answer:


 Your answer should have exactly 3 paragraphs. Make sure that the first paragraph starts with the word "identity" and that each paragraph is separated by two new lines.
user