Given the document below, determine if the summary is factually consistent with the document. A summary is factually consistent if no facts in the summary reflect the negation of a fact in the document.

Document: A short while ago the pound was up 0.45% at $1.476, having hit $1.479, its highest since January 4, the first trading day of the year. On Monday the pound jumped the most in a single day against the dollar in seven years. The currency market has been reacting to polls which have recently suggested the Remain campaign gaining ground. Last week the pound was trading close to $1.41, its lowest level since early April. On Monday, against the euro, the pound gained 0.2% to a,!1.301. Bookmaker NAME_1 and NAME_2 show a 73% chance that the UK will vote to remain in the European Union. Analysts said that a vote to leave the EU would likely lead to a sharp drop in the pound. "If the UK does leave the EU, there will uncertainty from a political standpoint and a fiscal and monetary policy standpoint. This would drive investors from

Summary: 1. "They are advising our clients to go neutral into the vote, although we remain constructive," said NAME_3, currency strategist at Credit Agricole.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document with respect to facts?
Options: "Yes" or "No"

Answer:


 I want the entire output in JSON format.
user