Given the document below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document:
The 22-year-old fractured her neck and back, dislocated her pelvis and slipped a disc in her neck after colliding with Elis Ligtlee during the omnium final. NAME_1 NAME_2 spent four weeks in hospital after January's accident. "They were pretty sure paralysis was going to be the outcome while I was in Rotterdam, but luckily I pulled through," she told BBC Look East. "Being an athlete, I think they said because my neck and back were so strong I was able to withstand the force. "Although I did break a few bones, my spinal cord stayed intact and I'm here to live another day." Racing at the event was cancelled after the 2013 World Championships bronze medallist's crash, with fans asked to leave the velodrome. "I have no memories, which is probably pretty good," she said. "It's not going to put me off in the future," she said. "I remember holding

Summary:
1. Britain's NAME_3 says she is lucky to be alive after breaking her neck in a crash at the European Track Cycling Championships in Rotterdam.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document? (Yes/No)
Start your answer explicitly with "Yes" or "No", and if you answer no, explain which sentence is inconsistent and why.
 The word "rotterdam" should not appear in your response.
user