We have submitted a journal paper which was rejected. It is about a design of a new graphene THz antenna. One reason for rejection was that we do not have experimental results. We have fixed all issues pointed out by reviewers, excepting that one. Editor suggested that we submit the paper once all reviewer's issues were resolved. We will submit the paper. Suggest justifications for the impossibility of making the experiments for convincing the editor and reviewers to accept the submission. Do not include the following keywords: experiment, graphene, reason, result
user