Given the document below, determine if the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Example Document: NAME_1 remains on course to win a record-equaling 22nd grand slam title after beating American NAME_2 in straight sets in the Australian Open semifinals Friday, setting up a mouthwatering final with NAME_3. The Serbian faced stiff opposition from the big-hitting NAME_4 in his 7-5 6-1 6-2 victory to reach his 33rd grand slam final. His victory came just hours after Tsitsipas had beaten Russian NAME_5 Khachanov 7-6 (7-2) 6-4 6-7 (6-8) 6-3 to reach his second career grand slam final.

Example Summary 1: NAME_1 will face NAME_3 in the Australian Open final after beating NAME_2 in straight sets.

Options: "Yes" or "No"

Answer: Yes, the summary is factually consistent with the article.



Given the document below, determine if the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document: Under a tax scheme in place since 2005, some firms could reduce taxable profits in Belgium by up to 90%. Companies that were not part of global groups could not claim the same benefits, which Europe's Competition Commission said "distorts competition". European firms were the main beneficiaries, according to the EU. Commissioner NAME_6, in charge of competition policy, said: "Belgium has given a select number of multinationals substantial tax advantages that break EU state aid rules. It distorts competition on the merits by putting smaller competitors who are no You should write your response with 400 or more words.
user