Given the document below, determine if the summary is factually consistent with the document. A summary is factually consistent if all the numbers in the summary are presented the same way as in the document.

Document: NAME_1 NAME_2, 62, from Widegates near Looe, NAME_3 was branded a "dyed in the wool, predatory paedophile" by a judge. NAME_2 filmed women using secret cameras and sexually abused children. As he left the dock at Truro Crown Court, NAME_2 threatened to curse those in the courtroom. Jurors took three hours to find NAME_2 guilty of 19 counts of sexual assault and gross indecency with a child, and two of attempted rape. He had already pleaded guilty to eight voyeurism offences - and admitted filming women with hidden cameras disguised as light switches in a toilet. Recorder NAME_4 QC told NAME_2: "I am absolutely sure you are and will remain a substantial danger to children physically and psychologically" He said NAME_2 had an "ingrained, long-term and continuing sexual depravity towards young women and children". Throughout the trial the NAME_5 impersonator wore aviator-style sunglasses, and he was animated throughout the

Summary: 1. Recorder NAME_4 QC told NAME_2: "I am absolutely sure you are and will remain a substantial danger to children physically and psychologically"

Is the summary factually consistent with the document with respect to numbers?
Options: "Yes" or "No"

Answer:


 Please reply with exactly 7 paragraphs and separate each paragraph with two new lines. The very last paragraph must start with the word "open".
user