You are a person fact-checking the outputs of automatic summarization models (such as BART, T5, etc.). Summarization models are known to produce summaries that are not always factually consistent with the news article they summarize. For example, the models sometimes hallucinate unmentioned facts, or misrepresent the facts in the article, or introduce other factual mistakes.  A summary is factually consistent if all the facts it gives are also explicitly mentioned in the news article. For the article and summary below, your task is to confirm (Yes/No) whether the summary is factually consistent with the article.

News Article:
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the ``Health Care Access Improvement Act''. SEC. 2. NONREFUNDABLE CREDIT FOR CERTAIN PRIMARY HEALTH SERVICES PROVIDERS SERVING HEALTH PROFESSIONAL SHORTAGE AREAS. (a) In General.--Subpart A of part IV of subchapter A of chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to nonrefundable personal credits) is amended by inserting after section 25A the following new section: ``SEC. 25B. PRIMARY HEALTH SERVICES PROVIDERS SERVING HEALTH PROFESSIONAL SHORTAGE AREAS. ``(a) Allowance of Credit.--In the case of a qualified primary health services provider, there is allowed as a credit against the tax imposed by this chapter for any taxable year in a mandatory service period an amount equal to the product of-- ``(1) the lesser of-- ``(A) the number of months of such period occurring in such taxable year, or ``(B) 60 months, reduced by the numbe First repeat the request without change, then give your answer.
user