Given the document below, determine if the summary is factually consistent with the document. A summary is factually consistent if no facts in the summary reflect the negation of a fact in the document.

Document: The Kilcoo pair both underwent surgery on dislocated shoulders in March and are out of the provincial quarter-final with the champions at Clones on 5 June. No indication has yet been given of a return date for the injured pair. Meanwhile NAME_1 has informed NAME_2 boss NAME_3 that he is opting out of the Mourne panel. NAME_4, who has been a Championship regular for NAME_2 in recent seasons, has decided to travel to America in June. The Saval forward only made two substitute appearances, against Donegal and Roscommon, in the Mournemen's Football League campaign, which saw them lose every game in being relegated from Division One. Last month, Rostrevor's Caolan NAME_5 informed NAME_6 that he was quitting the county panel. In a boost to his defensive options, NAME_6 is soon expected to be able to call upon the experienced NAME_7, who has been sidelined since rupturing his

Summary: 1. In a boost to to his defensive options, NAME_6 is soon expected to be able to call upon the experienced NAME_7, who has been sidelined since rupturing his Achilles tendon in March.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document with respect to facts?
Options: "Yes" or "No"

Answer:


 Provide exactly two different responses that are separated with 6 asterisk symbols: ******.
user