Given the document below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document:
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the ``Government Shutdown Prevention Act''. SEC. 2. CONTINUING FUNDING. (a) In General.--If any regular appropriation bill for any fiscal year does not become law prior to the beginning of these fiscal years or a joint resolution making continuing appropriations is not in effect, there is appropriated, out of any moneys in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, and out of applicable corporate or other revenues, receipts, and funds, such sums as may be necessary to continue any program, project, or activity for which funds were provided in those fiscal years. (b) Level of Funding.--Appropriations and funds made available, and authority granted, for a program, project, or activity for any fiscal year pursuant to this Act shall be at 100 percent of the rate of operations that was provided for the program, project, or activity in fiscal year 1999 in the corresponding regular appropriation Act for fiscal year 1999. (c) Period of Availability.--Appropriations and funds made available, and authority granted, for any fiscal year pursuant to this Act for a program, project,

Summary:
1. Government Shutdown Prevention Act - Provides for continuing appropriations (at 75 percent of the rate of operations provided for in FY 1999) in the absence of regular appropriations for any fiscal year.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document Provide exactly two different responses that are separated with 6 asterisk symbols: ******.
user