Given the document below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document:
A report by NAME_1 found that NAME_2 transferred nearly $1.8 billion worth of stablecoins collateral to hedge funds last year. The beneficiaries included NAME_3, NAME_4, and NAME_5's Alameda Research. NAME_1 has claimed that the transfer of assets was similar to maneuvers made by FTX before its implosion. A spokesperson for the exchange clarified that there was no commingling of funds. A sensational report published by NAME_1 earlier today shed a light on a series of transfers made by the world's largest crypto exchange, NAME_2, last year. The transfers involved more than a billion dollars worth of assets that were meant to back stablecoins belonging to the exchange's customers. NAME_1 claimed that the transfers were "eerily similar" to FTX's activities before its implosion. NAME_2 transferred stablecoin collateral to Alameda Research According to on-chain data gathered by NAME_1, the transfers started on 17 August last year. NAME_2 reportedly transferred the funds that backed $1 billion worth of B-peg USDC belonging to its customers, to multiple hedge funds. The report found that the B-peg USD Coins were left with no collateral

Summary:
1. A report by NAME_1 found that NAME_2 accidentally transferred $1.8 billion worth of funds to several hedge funds in August 2022.
2. The funds were meant to back B-peg PAX belonging to the exchange's customers.

Is the su In your response, capitalize a few words to stress main points. Please limit the number of words with all capital letters to less than 17.
user