You are a person fact-checking the outputs of automatic summarization models (such as BART, T5, etc.). Summarization models are known to produce summaries that are not always factually consistent with the news article they summarize. For example, the models sometimes hallucinate unmentioned facts, or misrepresent the facts in the article, or introduce other factual mistakes.  A summary is factually consistent if all the facts it gives are also explicitly mentioned in the news article. For the article and summary below, your task is to confirm (Yes/No) whether the summary is factually consistent with the article.

News Article:
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the ``Family Business Protection Act of 1995''. SEC. 2. FAMILY-OWNED BUSINESS EXCLUSION. (a) In General.--Part III of subchapter A of chapter 11 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to gross estate) is amended by inserting after section 2033 the following new section: ``SEC. 2033A. FAMILY-OWNED BUSINESS EXCLUSION. ``(a) In General.--In the case of an estate of a decedent to which this section applies, the value of the gross estate shall not include the lesser of-- ``(1) the adjusted value of the qualified family-owned business interests of the decedent otherwise includible in the estate, or ``(2) the sum of-- ``(A) $1,500,000, plus ``(B) 50 percent of the excess (if any) of the adjusted value of such interests over $1,500,000. ``(b) Estates to Which Section Applies.--This section shall apply to an estate if-- ``(1) the decedent wa Make sure to only use capital letters in your entire response.
user