Given the document below, determine if the summary is factually consistent with the document.
A summary is factually consistent if all statements in the summary are entailed by the document.

Document: NAME_1 hit the front after four minutes when NAME_2 converted from the spot after NAME_3 handled. The hosts' NAME_4 was dismissed for a professional foul after the interval but it was 10 v 10 when NAME_5 was booked for a second time. NAME_6's hopes of taking something ended when goalkeeper NAME_7 saw red for serious foul play.

Summary: 1. The hosts' NAME_4 was dismissed for a professional foul after the interval but it was 10 v 10 when NAME_5 was booked for a second time.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document?
Start your answer with "Yes" or "No".

Answer:


 The word "hope" should not appear in your response.
user