Given the document below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document:
Previous work (NAME_1 et al., 2015; NAME_2 et al., 2017) has found difficulty developing generative models based on variational autoencoders (VAEs) for text. To address the problem of the decoder ignoring information from the encoder (posterior collapse), these previous models weaken the capacity of the decoder to force the model to use information from latent variables. However, this strategy is not ideal as it degrades the quality of generated text and increases hyper-parameters. In this paper, we propose a new VAE for text utilizing a multimodal prior distribution, a modified encoder, and multi-task learning. We show our model can generate well-conditioned sentences without weakening the capacity of the decoder. Also, the multimodal prior distribution improves the interpretability of acquired representations.

Summary:
1. We propose a model of variational autoencoders for image modeling without weakening the capacity of the decoder, which improves the quality of text generation and interpretability of acquired representations.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document? (Yes/No)
Start your answer explicitly with "Yes" or "No", and if you answer no, explain which sentence is inconsistent and why.
 There should be exactly 4 paragraphs separated by the markdown divider: ***.
user