Given the document below, determine if the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Example Document: NAME_1 remains on course to win a record-equaling 22nd grand slam title after beating American NAME_2 in straight sets in the Australian Open semifinals Friday, setting up a mouthwatering final with NAME_3. The Serbian faced stiff opposition from the big-hitting NAME_4 in his 7-5 6-1 6-2 victory to reach his 33rd grand slam final. His victory came just hours after Tsitsipas had beaten Russian NAME_5 Khachanov 7-6 (7-2) 6-4 6-7 (6-8) 6-3 to reach his second career grand slam final.

Example Summary 1: NAME_1 will face NAME_3 in the Australian Open final after beating NAME_2 in straight sets.

Options: "Yes" or "No"

Answer: Yes, the summary is factually consistent with the article.



Given the document below, determine if the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document: NAME_6 had intended to leave her shares in a 750 acre estate around Bantham in NAME_7 to the village after her death. But she was "very upset" over local objections to the estate's decision to let a food bus use the beach car park, her widower revealed. As a result, NAME_8 dropped her plans before she died last November. She was one of five directors of Evans Estates, which includes much of Bantham village as well as a long sandy beach and surrounding farmland. Her husband NAME_9, 74, said she had been keen for the village to be left "several million pounds" as a In your response, use words with all capital letters at least 16 times.
user