Given the document below, determine if the summary is factually consistent with the document. A summary is factually consistent if all the pronouns in the summary are presented the same way as in the document and they do not introduce any ambiguity.

Document: DUP leader NAME_1 warned that it could happen within 24 hours. However, NAME_2's Martin NAME_3 said he had been assured by NAME_4 that he would not suspend the assembly. Doing so, said Mr NAME_3, would be "a grave mistake". A political crisis has been sparked in Northern Ireland following the murder of former IRA man NAME_5 Sr. Police have said they believe IRA members were involved in the shooting. NAME_2 has denied this and maintains the Provisional IRA no longer exists. The PSNI chief constable also said there was no evidence that the killing was sanctioned by the organisation. On Wednesday, well-known republican and northern chairman of NAME_2 NAME_6 was one of three men arrested over the murder. Speaking at a press conference later that day, NAME_7 said: "If we can't stop the assembly by way of adjournment or suspension then we

Summary: 1. Its main function is to consider what business is to be scheduled for assembly plenary sessions, held on Monday and Wednesday.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document with respect to pronouns used?
Options: "Yes" or "No"

Answer:


 Give two different versions of responses. Please separate the responses with 6 asterisk symbols: ******.
user