You are a person fact-checking the outputs of automatic summarization models (such as BART, T5, etc.). Summarization models are known to produce summaries that are not always factually consistent with the news article they summarize. For example, the models sometimes hallucinate unmentioned facts, or misrepresent the facts in the article, or introduce other factual mistakes.  A summary is factually consistent if all the facts it gives are also explicitly mentioned in the news article. For the article and summary below, your task is to confirm (Yes/No) whether the summary is factually consistent with the article.

News Article:
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. This Act may be cited as the ``Multiemployer Retirees Medical Equity Benefits Act of 1993''. SEC. 2. USE OF MULTIEMPLOYER PLAN CONTRIBUTIONS AND ASSETS FOR RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS. (a) General Rule.--Section 401 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by redesignating subsection (o) as subsection (p) and by inserting after subsection (n) the following new subsection: ``(o) Use of Multiemployer Plan Contributions for Retiree Health Benefits.-- ``(1) In general.--Amounts contributed to a multiemployer pension plan shall be treated for all purposes of this title as if they had been contributed directly by the contributing employers, pursuant to the designation of such employers, to a related retiree medical benefits plan if-- ``(A) the trustees of the multiemployer pension plan elect to transfer such amounts to such related retiree medical benefit plan; ``(B)  First repeat the request without change, then give your answer.
user