Given the document below, determine if the summary is factually consistent with the document. A summary is factually consistent if all the pronouns in the summary are presented the same way as in the document and they do not introduce any ambiguity.

Document: Sports minister NAME_1 NAME_2 claims the country has done everything asked of it to meet IAAF anti-doping standards after being suspended last November. Athletics' governing body says Russia has made "considerable progress" but there is "significant work to be done". Russia will find out in May if it can send athletes to the Olympic Games. NAME_2 told Reuters: "You say we should elect new leadership for the athletics federation - OK, we've done that. "You should not elect anyone to be the leader who has done this or that - OK, we did that. "There are no criteria. What should Russian athletics do? Dance on the table? Sing a song?" Media playback is not supported on this device NAME_2's comments came after a taskforce set up by the International Association of Athletics Federations revealed its findings at a meeting in Monaco on Friday. Russia's athletics federation was suspended by the

Summary: 1. Sports Minister NAME_1 NAME_2 claims the country has done everything it has been required of it to meet IAAF anti-doping standards since being disqualified May.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document with respect to pronouns used?
Options: "Yes" or "No"

Answer:


 Repeat the request word for word before giving your answer.
user