Given the document below, determine if the summary is factually consistent with the document.
A summary is factually consistent if all statements in the summary are entailed by the document.

Document: On Monday, Allergan rejected the offer, but NAME_1 said it will announce a new offer on 28 May. The firm said it will hold a webcast for Allergan shareholders, thereby bypassing Allergan's board. NAME_1 is trying to become the fifth-biggest drugmaker by 2016. Last year, the firm bought Bausch & Lomb, one of the biggest makers of eye health products. In a letter to shareholders, NAME_1 wrote: "As you are all aware, yesterday we received Allergan's letter rejecting NAME_1's offer. We note that our offer was rejected without Allergan having had any discussions with NAME_1." "We will not stop our pursuit of this combination until we hear directly from Allergan shareholders that you prefer Allergan's 'stay the course plan' to a combination with NAME_1," said NAME_1 chief executive NAME_2 in statement. Allerga rejected the offer because it said it had questions about NAME_1's long-term growth as well as its

Summary: 1. 28 May.
2. The firm said it will hold a webcast for Allergan shareholders, thereby bypassing Allergan's board.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document?
Start your answer with "Yes" or "No".

Answer:


 You should write your response with 250 or more words.
user