Given the document below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document:
A predatory convicted paedophile with an obsession with young girls has gone on the run after vanishing from a psychiatric unit. NAME_1, 54, described as having a 'fanatical obsession' with small girls after he targeted a toddler on a bus, has been missing since 6.15pm on Tuesday and was last seen leaving a hospital, near Hook, Hampshire. Now officers have launched a manhunt to find NAME_2 - who was detained under the Mental Health Act after sexually touching the three-year-old girl. A predatory convicted paedophile with an obsession with young girls has gone on the run after vanishing from a psychiatric unit. NAME_1, 54, (pictured with and without a beard) was last seen leaving a hospital, near Hook, Hampshire . He is described as about 5ft 8ins tall, of a heavy build, and has dark hair. Officers said they believed that NAME_2, who suffers from learning difficulties, may

Summary:
1. NAME_1 , 54 , has been missing since 6.15 pm on Tuesday .
2. He was last seen leaving a hospital , near Hook , Hampshire .
3. NAME_2 was detained under the Mental Health Act after sexually touching the three-year-old girl .
4. Officers believe he may have shaved off his beard before leaving hospital .

Is the summary factually consistent with the document? (Yes/No)
Start your answer explicitly with "Yes" or "No", and if you answer no, explain which sentence is inconsistent and why.
 Provide your response in exactly 4 paragraphs (separated nearby paragraphs with 3 aterisk symbols ***).
user