Given the document below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document:
Officials believe NAME_1, 40, killed himself early on Wednesday. In the 1990s, he was a star player at the University of Nebraska, making him a sought-after rookie in the NFL. NAME_2 played for the St Louis Rams, Miami Dolphins and San Francisco 49ers until 1999, but he was plagued by trouble on and off the field. After his NFL career, NAME_2 continued to have problems with the law. Eventually, he was sent to prison after being convicted of assault for driving his car into a group of teenagers. In another case, he was convicted of assaulting a former girlfriend. NAME_2, who was serving a term of more than 30 years, had been placed in a cell alone after he was accused of killing his former cellmate. On Tuesday, a judge found that there was enough evidence to try NAME_2 in the death of NAME_3, 37. It is unclear

Summary:
1. A former National Football League (NFL) player has been found dead in his Nebraska prison cell.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document? (Yes/No)
Start your answer explicitly with "Yes" or "No", and if you answer no, explain which sentence is inconsistent and why.
 Please reply with exactly 6 paragraphs and separate each paragraph with two new lines. The very first paragraph must start with the word "accounts".
user