'On June 27, 1962, NAME_1, a candidate for public office, made a television speech in Baton Rouge, Louisiana.  During this speech, NAME_2 accused his political opponent of being a Communist and of being involved in criminal activities with the head of the local Teamsters Union.  Finally, NAME_2 implicated NAME_3, an East Baton Rouge deputy sheriff, in a scheme to move money between the Teamsters Union and NAME_2’s political opponent. \NAME_4 successfully sued NAME_2 for defamation.  Louisiana’s First Circuit Court of Appeals reversed, holding that NAME_5 did not show NAME_2 acted with “malice.”  NAME_5 then appealed to the Supreme Court of Louisiana.  That court held that, although public figures forfeit some of their First Amendment protection from defamation, NAME_2 accused NAME_5 of a crime with utter disregard of whether the remarks were true.  Finally, that court held that the First Amendment protects uninhibited, robust debate, rather than an open season to shoot down the good name of anyone who happens to be a public servant. \n'

Who are fighting? Tell me plaintiff and defendant. Please answer in JSON format.
user