Given the document below, determine if the summary is factually consistent with the document. A summary is factually consistent if all the dates and times in the summary are presented the same way as in the document.

Document: The BBC has learnt lock NAME_1 NAME_2 and centre NAME_3 are both in danger of being shock exclusions from NAME_4 NAME_5's squad. England captain NAME_6 NAME_7's chances are rated as 50-50, but about 14 Englishmen are expected to be included. Rookie prop NAME_8 and centre NAME_9 Te'o look likely to make the cut. Head coach NAME_5 is set to name his squad of 37-39 players at midday on Wednesday. NAME_5 and his coaches will meet for a final selection meeting on Tuesday, with NAME_10 sources insisting nothing is yet set in stone. Wasps NAME_11 NAME_2, 26, was short-listed for Six Nations player of the tournament, but is part of a fierce competition for places in the second row. With NAME_12 and NAME_13 certainties to make the touring party, NAME_2 is believed to have slipped below compatriots NAME_14 and NAME_15 in the NAME_10 pecking

Summary: 1. The BBC understands that both NAME_2 and center NAME_3 may not be excluded from NAME_4 's lineup.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document with respect to dates and times?
Options: "Yes" or "No"

Answer:


 Provide the entire answer in JSON format.
user