extract all the entities and their roles from a legal document?     COURT OF CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE SHOPIAN\n                                        Present: Surjeet Singh Bali.\n\n    F. No. 24/B       D.O.Inst. 12-05-2012       D.O.Dec.18-11-2017\n\n    IN THE CASE OF:-\n\n\n                          State through Police Station Shopian.\n\n                                       VERSUS\n\n    NAME_1 S/o, NAME_2, Keegam Shopian.\n\n                                                                    Accused.\n\n    FIR No. 84/2012\n    Offences under section 279,337 RPC and 146/196,3/181 M.V.Act.\n\n\n    Present:-\n    Ld PO for the State.\n    Accused along with his counsel\n                                       JUDGMENT\n       1.   Today the case was fixed for recording of the statement of accused\n\n\n(\x1f person in terms of Section 342 CrPC. Ld. counsel appearing on behalf\n            of the accused       person has submitted    that prosecution has not\n\n\n            examined any witness during the trial,      as    such has prayed for\n\n\n            truncating the proceeding against the   accused person. Ld. counsel for\n\n\n            the accused person has also submitted that chaIlan against the accused\n\n            person has    been filed before this Court on     12-05-2012   and the\n\n\n            statement of accused person in terms of section 242 Cr.P.C          was\n\n\n            recorded on 26-02-2013. Ld. counsel for the accused person has\n\n\n            submitted that since then despite number of opportunities given to the\n\n\n            prosecution failed   to examine even a single witness. Ld. counsel for\n\n\n            the accused person as such has submitted for truncating the proceedings\n\n\n            against the accused person at this stage.\n\n\n       2. Ld. PO for the state has not rebutted this argument. Accordingly I have\n\n\n            perused   the file. After hearing the Id. counsel for the accused person\n\n\n            and Id. PO for the state. I find substance in the argument advanced by\n\x0c            the Id. counsel for the accused person and I deem it proper to state brie\n\ni           facts of the prosecution case.\nI\n,\n\n\n\n\nI\n,\n\n         3. Brief facts of the prosecution story are that police of J     1ice Station\n\n\n            Shopian registered a case vide FIR No. 84/2012 for the commission of\n\n\n            offences under section 279,337 RPC and 146/196,3/181 M.V.Act.\n\n            Allegations against t There should be exactly 6 paragraphs separated by the markdown divider: ***.
user