Given the document below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document:
NAME_1, 24, was arrested on Monday amid claims she had sex with pupil, 15, in her car on consecutive nights in January . A Texas math teacher has been accused of having sex with an underage pupil from a Texas high school a month after she was arrested for letting another teenage touch her breasts. NAME_1, 24, a teacher at MacArthur High School in Irving, was first arrested on March 19 for having an inappropriate relationship with a 15-year-old student, and was released on bail. Now she has been arrested again after another pupil, also aged 15, also accused NAME_2 of having sex with him on two consecutive nights in January this year. According to the affidavit, seen by the Star-Telegram, the teen claims the sexual relationship took place in her car late at night on January 18 and 19 across the road from another school in Dallas.

Summary:
1. NAME_1, 24, arrested on March 19 for having sex with 15-year-old .
2. Teacher at MacArthur High School in Irving, Texas, released on $50,000 bail .
3. On Monday she was arrested again amid claims she had sex with pupil .
4. Affidavit says relationship took place in her car on two nights in January .

Is the summary factually consistent with the document? (Yes/No)
Start your answer explicitly with "Yes" or "No", and if you answer no, explain which sentence is inconsistent and why.
 Add stress words which are capitalized. Limit those stress words for less than 13 times.
user