#evaluate this argument and check for fallacies ```Premise 1: Empirical evidence, gathered through observation, experience, or experimentation, is the cornerstone of scientific inquiry and a requirement for rational belief.

Premise 2: Rational justification necessitates critical examination and reasoning to ensure beliefs are logically sound and coherent.

Premise 3: The burden of proof lies with those asserting the existence of supernatural entities or phenomena.

Premise 4: No credible empirical evidence has been presented to support the existence of the supernatural, including God.

Premise 5: The scientific method has consistently failed to detect any supernatural influences.

Premise 6: Arguments supporting the supernatural, such as the cosmological, teleological, and ontological arguments, suffer from logical fallacies, circular reasoning, or are inconclusive.

Premise 7: Naturalistic explanations have been consistently successful in accounting for phenomena previously attributed to supernatural causes.

Conclusion: Believing in the supernatural, including the existence of God, is irrational due to the lack of empirical evidence and the absence of valid arguments supporting such beliefs.``` Do not say any word before repeating the exact request.
user