Given the document below, determine if the summary is factually consistent with the document. A summary is factually consistent if all the numbers in the summary are presented the same way as in the document.

Document: The money, which comes from Stormont, has been freed up by a deal agreed between NAME_1 and the Irish Football Association. As far back as 2006 plans were drawn up for a 6,000 seater stadium, and more recently there have been calls for urgent funding to carry out essential safety works at Derry City's home ground. It now looks as if a share of a pot of APS31 million will be made available, which will be directed towards the redevelopment of Brandywell and also a new stadium for Glentoran. A significant sum has also been earmarked for a national academy. The money was freed up through a new 51-year-deal between the IFA and NAME_1 over the use of Windsor Park. The chairman of Derry City, NAME_2, dismissed concerns that the stadium should not benefit because the club doesn't play in the Irish League. "We pay tax, we pay VAT

Summary: 1. It now appears that a share of a PS 31million pot will not be made available, which will be directed towards the Brandywell redevelopment and also a new stadium for Glentoran.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document with respect to numbers?
Options: "Yes" or "No"

Answer:


 Write exactly 5 paragraphs each separated with two new lines answering this question. The last paragraph must start with "identity".
user