Given the document below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document:
These are external links and will open in a new window. Police now believe that the 26-year-old man from Rochdale took a crystallised and unrefined version of the drug Spice. NAME_1, described the development as "extremely worrying". Ten people were admitted to hospital after taking the drug over the weekend, with four kept in intensive care. A police spokesman said they were hospitalised after taking what was thought to be a new form of MDMA, known as "pink champagne". But he added: "It is now believed that this substance was in fact a synthetic cannabinoid, like 'Spice', however it was sold as MDMA." NAME_1 said: "This is the first time we have seen 'Spice' in crystallised, and much more potent and unrefined form and it's now being mistakenly taken as MDMA." He added: "Anyone thinking of taking MDMA must seriously consider what they are

Summary:
1. A man who was arrested after taking what was thought to be a new form of MDMA, known as "pink champagne", may have taken a synthetic version of the drug Spice, Greater Manchester Police have said.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document? (Yes/No)
Start your answer explicitly with "Yes" or "No", and if you answer no, explain which sentence is inconsistent and why.
 Avoid using the following keywords: window, drug, greater, manchester
user