Given the document below, determine if the summary is factually consistent with the document. Together with the answer provide your reasoning. 

Example Document: NAME_1 remains on course to win a record-equaling 22nd grand slam title after beating American NAME_2 in straight sets in the Australian Open semifinals Friday, setting up a mouthwatering final with NAME_3. The Serbian faced stiff opposition from the big-hitting NAME_4 in his 7-5 6-1 6-2 victory to reach his 33rd grand slam final. His victory came just hours after Tsitsipas had beaten Russian NAME_5 Khachanov 7-6 (7-2) 6-4 6-7 (6-8) 6-3 to reach his second career grand slam final.

Example Summary 1: NAME_1 won a record-equaling 22nd grand slam title after beating NAME_2 in straight sets at the Australian Open on Friday.

Provide the reasoning and answer "Yes" or "No".

Reasoning:
The document states that:
NAME_1 beat NAME_2 in the Australian Open semifinals on Friday.
NAME_1 will face NAME_3 in the final.
Therefore, it is not known whether NAME_1 won the final match.
Answer: No, the summary is not factually correct.



Given the document below, determine if the summary is factually consistent with the document. Together with the answer provide your reasoning. 

Document: The payments, funded by taxpayers, were made through a legal loophole, an Associated Press investigation has uncovered. Some are still being paid. Former guards at Nazi labour camps, where millions died, are amo Provide the entire answer in JSON format.
user