Given the document below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document:
| NAME_1: NAME_2! | NAME_3: NAME_4! | NAME_1: So, what about Foucault's Pendulum? Do you like it? | NAME_3: It's... weird. Was it really written by an Italian guy? It's so... nerdy. | NAME_1: Oh well, in a sense NAME_5 was the king of nerds. And, you know, not all Italian books are about pizza, mafia and mandolino. :P | NAME_3: Yes, I know... I should try and read one of his novels in the original, but I'm not sure my level of Italian is adequate. | NAME_1: The Name of the NAME_6 is really difficult for a foreign speaker of Italian, you know. | NAME_3: And what about Foucault's Pendulum? | NAME_1: Well, it's set in the 1980s, so the language is definitely more comprehensible. The content, however, is just as complicated as in the other novel. | NAME_3: Btw, I read NAME_7's review of Pendulum,

Summary:
1. NAME_3 doesn't like NAME_8's pendulum.
2. NAME_1 thinks that NAME_5 was the king of nerds.
3. NAME_3 read "Pendulum" by NAME_8.
4. NAME_3 read NAME_7's review of Pendulum.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document? (Yes/No)
Start your answer explicitly with "Yes" or "No", and if you answer no, explain which sentence is inconsistent and why.
 Add stress words which are capitalized. Limit those stress words for less than 12 times.
user