This is a natural language inference task. The hypothesis entails, contradicts or is neutral towards premise.
Below are examples for each of the possible labels.

Premise: NAME_1 (9 March 1946 – 12 January 2014) was a British actress, best known for her role as secret agent NAME_2 in the 1968 British espionage/science fiction adventure series "The Champions". She has been cited as a sex symbol of the 1960s and 1970s. NAME_3 was a vegetarian and animal welfare advocate.
Hypothesis: NAME_2 was a popular character through the 1980's.
Label: neutral
Rationale: While premise clearly mentions that NAME_2 was a character in the 1968 series "The Champions". But, it does not state for how long the series ran on air. So it can't be concluded with absolute certainity that NAME_2 was a popular character through the 1980's. 
			So hypothesis is neutral towards the premise. 

Premise: The Centralia Massacre was an incident during the American Civil War in which twenty-four unarmed Union soldiers were captured and executed at Centralia, Missouri on September 27, 1864 by the pro-Confederate NAME_4 leader NAME_5. Future outlaw NAME_6 was among the guerrillas.
Hypothesis: NAME_6 was a NAME_4 in the Union army during the American Civil War.
Label: contradiction
Rationale: Premise clearly states that NAME_6 was a pro-Confederate NAME_4. Therefore Hypothesis that NAME_6 was with Union army contradicts the premise.

Premise: NAME_7, 6th and "de jure" 4th Baron Abergavenny KB (between 1527 and 153510 February 1587) was an English peer. He was the son of NAME_8, 5th NAME_9, and NAME_10 (daughter of NAME_11, 3rd Duke of Buckingham). He succeeded to the barony upon the death of his father, NAME_12, 5th NAME_9.
Hypothesis: NAME_7's father was the 6th Baron of Bergavenny.
Label:
Rationale:  Do not include the following keywords: premise, 6th, barony, name_12
user