Given the document below, determine if the summary is factually consistent with the document. A summary is factually consistent if no facts in the summary reflect the negation of a fact in the document.

Document: NAME_1 hit the front after four minutes when NAME_2 converted from the spot after NAME_3 Bolochoweckyj handled. The hosts' NAME_4 NAME_5 was dismissed for a professional foul after the interval but it was 10 v 10 when NAME_6 was booked for a second time. NAME_7's hopes of taking something ended when goalkeeper NAME_8 saw red for serious foul play.

Summary: 1. The hosts' NAME_4 NAME_5 was dismissed for a professional foul after the interval but it was 10 v 10 when NAME_6 was booked for a second time.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document with respect to facts?
Options: "Yes" or "No"

Answer:


 In your response, capitalize a few words to stress main points. Please limit the number of words with all capital letters to less than 11.
user