Given the document below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document:
NAME_1: Set down, set down your honourable load, If honour may be shrouded in a hearse, Whilst I awhile obsequiously lament The untimely fall of virtuous NAME_2. Poor key-cold figure of a holy NAME_3! NAME_4 ashes of the house of NAME_2! NAME_5 bloodless remnant of that royal blood! Be it lawful that I invocate thy ghost, To hear the lamentations of Poor NAME_6, Wife to thy NAME_7, to thy slaughter'd son, Stabb'd by the selfsame hand that made these wounds! NAME_8, in these windows that let forth thy life, I pour the helpless balm of my poor eyes. Cursed be the hand that made these fatal holes! Cursed be the heart that had the heart to do it! Cursed the blood that let this blood from hence! More direful hap betide that hated wretch, That makes us wretched by the death of thee, Than I can wish to adders, spiders, toads, Or any creeping venom'd thing that lives! If ever he have child, abortive be it, Prodigious, and untimely brought to light, Whose ugly and unnatural aspect May fright

Summary:
1. In this excerpt, NAME_1 laments the death of NAME_3 NAME_9 and blames NAME_10 for the savage acts that led to his demise.
2. NAME_10 defends himself and insists he did not kill NAME_6's husband, but she remains unconvinced and curses him for his actions.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document? (Yes/No)
Start your answer explicitly with "Yes" or "No", and if you answer no, e You should write your response with 400 or more words.
user