Given the document below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document:
These are external links and will open in a new window. In 2013, the Italian composer was reported as saying he wouldn't work with NAME_1 because he "places music in his films without coherence". But the 87-year-old told the BBC he had no issues with how the director incorporated his older works into films like NAME_2 and Django Unchained. "On the contrary, I was very, very flattered," he said. "The fact that my music, which had been written for other films, could be adapted to the poetry of NAME_3's film-making was a great gift for me. "The only thing I criticised of NAME_3 was a single scene in a single movie which, for me, was too violent and too ghastly. I couldn't watch it." Speaking through an interpreter, the NAME_4 said his original comments had been mis-reported, adding: "People should pay a lot of attention when they

Summary:
1. NAME_5 has said he was "very flattered" to be asked to score NAME_3's latest film, The Hateful Eight, despite previously saying the director was "too violent and too ghastly".

Is the summary factually consistent with the document? (Yes/No)
Start your answer explicitly with "Yes" or "No", and if you answer no, explain which sentence is inconsistent and why.
 Provide your response in exactly 2 paragraphs (separated nearby paragraphs with 3 aterisk symbols ***).
user