Given the document below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document:
NAME_1 ended their four-month winless streak at home with a victory over NAME_2 in Serie A on Saturday in a key match for Champions League places. NAME_3 finished off a swift counter-attack for NAME_1 in the 25th minute and goalkeeper NAME_4 did the rest - saving shot after shot by NAME_2 in the second half. 'It's important to win a match and gain some continuity,' NAME_5 said. 'The last (four) months were tough in terms of results. So to win in front of our fans fills us with pride.' NAME_3 slots home to put NAME_1 ahead in the 25th minute after a clinical counter-attack . NAME_6 (second left) celebrates with his team-mates NAME_7, and NAME_8 after scoring . Second-place NAME_1 moved provisionally four points ahead of city rivals NAME_9, who play later on Saturday. They had gone seven matches since their last

Summary:
1. NAME_1 ended their four-month winless streak at home with a win over NAME_2 .
2. NAME_3 scored the only goal of the game in the 25th minute .
3. NAME_1 keeper NAME_4 was excellent to deny the visitors .

Is the summary factually consistent with the document? (Yes/No)
Start your answer explicitly with "Yes" or "No", and if you answer no, explain which sentence is inconsistent and why.
 Your response should contain less than 250 words.
user