in their paper "Security amplification by composition: The case of doubly-iterated,
  ideal ciphers", the author wrote:
We investigate, in the Shannon model, the security of constructions
corresponding to double and (two-key) triple DES. That is, we consider
F_{k1}(F_{k2}(.)) and F_{k1}(F_{k2}^{-1}(F_{k1}(.))) with the component
functions being ideal ciphers. This models the resistance of these
constructions to ``generic'' attacks like meet in the middle attacks. We obtain
the first proof that composition actually increases the security of these
constructions in some meaningful sense. We compute a bound on the probability
of breaking the double cipher as a function of the number of computations of
the base cipher made, and the number of examples of the composed cipher seen,
and show that the success probability is the square of that for a single key
cipher. The same bound holds for the two-key triple cipher. The first bound is
tight and shows that meet in the middle is the best possible generic attack
against the double cipher. Do not say the word "square" in the response
user