Given the document below, you have to determine if "Yes" or "No", the summary is factually consistent with the document.

Document:
Little is beyond their reach. Official documents and private communications are made public, and websites blocked. They hijack CCTV cameras, electronic billboards and network printers. The best known of the virtual warriors are the Ukrainian Cyber Troops, the Cyber Berkut and Anonymous International. All three present themselves as independent activists, separate from other, government-sponsored groups. The most prominent pro-Ukrainians hackers are the Ukrainian Cyber Troops, led by Kiev-based programmer NAME_1. Most recently, he claimed to have hacked into two Russian interior ministry servers and an email account used by police in Russia's Rostov region - bordering Ukraine's eastern separatist regions. "I gave all this data to Ukraine's security service, but they still can't get round to analysing it, so do it yourselves," he urged readers on Facebook. Volunteer activist group NAME_2 sifted through more than 35 gigabytes of the data and found what looked like official reports confirming

Summary:
1. Hackers from pro-Ukrainian and pro-Russian activist groups have been carrying out a wave of cyber attacks on government and rebel websites during the conflict in eastern Ukraine, as the BBC's Monitoring Monitoring team reports.

Is the summary factually consistent with the document? (Yes/No)
Start your answer explicitly with "Yes" or "No", and if you answer no, explain which sentence is inconsistent and why.
 Your answer should have exactly 5 paragraphs. Make sure that the last paragraph starts with the word "identity" and that each paragraph is separated by two new lines.
user